You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-333      
 
Author Message
25 new of 333 responses total.
mcnally
response 175 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 22 16:26 UTC 2006

 re #174:  do you get an error message of some sort?  are you trying to
 connect from a browser or a command-line ftp program?  Can you ftp to
 your own account using the same mechanism as you are trying to use for
 the mnac account?
rcurl
response 176 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 22 16:36 UTC 2006

No error message - just an immediate disconnect after entering the pw. I 
am using a command line ftp (via Mac Terminal). I can ftp to my own 
account with exactly the same procedure.
cross
response 177 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 22 16:51 UTC 2006

This response has been erased.

naftee
response 178 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 22 17:34 UTC 2006

i am a not for profit GreXer
ball
response 179 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 23 01:32 UTC 2006

Re #174: Have you tried sftp?
rcurl
response 180 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 23 01:50 UTC 2006

That's what I use. SFTP-2, in fact. Sorry I didn't make that clear. I
*think* the problem might be because the membership isn't current, or there
is a mistake in the membership records; or is a current membership not
required to ftp TO an account?
mcnally
response 181 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 23 04:36 UTC 2006

 membership isn't required to ftp to an account, AND I checked the
 groups that that account belongs to:  it appears to belong to the
 member and internet groups..
ball
response 182 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 23 15:47 UTC 2006

Re #180: perhaps it's an SSH/SFTP version problem.
rcurl
response 183 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 23 17:09 UTC 2006

Thanks for checking that, Mike.

I just went through connecting to both rcurl and mnac via SSH-2, using 
Terminal's (Mac OSX) Connect-to-Server directly, and both were fine. I 
then tried the same thing via SFTP-2, and could only connect to rcurl. The 
error message I got trying the connection to mnac was

Connecting to cyberspace.org...
mnac@cyberspace.org's password: 
Connection closed
[Process exited - exit code 255]

I even wrote out the mnac pw and copied it to paste in, to make sure I 
wasn't entering it incorrectly. Earlier I had changed the pw, and the new 
pw is OK to mnac for SSH while SFTP didn't work.

Does the above error message provide any clue?

Mike, are you staff, and able to change the pw and try it? (Just let me 
know what you change it to..... 8^})  If you aren't, could a staff member 
with root please check this out?

(The Staff list at the Grex website is from Jan '04.)
mcnally
response 184 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 23 17:28 UTC 2006

 I'll give it a try..
mcnally
response 185 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 23 17:56 UTC 2006

Here's what I tried:

1)  su'ed to root, then stashed a copy of the mnac
    account's password entry so I could restore it
    to normal afterward, then changed the password
    to a known string.  sftp'ed to grex and tried
    to log in but saw the same sort of behavior
    Rane is reporting:

        mcnally@radius:~$ sftp mnac@cyberspace.org
        Connecting to cyberspace.org...
        mnac@cyberspace.org's password:
        Connection closed

    To make sure it wasn't just an authentication
    error I logged in using the wrong password
    intentionally and got prompted to enter the
    password again, so if Rane is not seeing such
    a message he must be using the right password.

        mcnally@radius:~$ sftp mnac@cyberspace.org
        mnac@cyberspace.org's password:
        Permission denied, please try again.

    Finally, to verify that sftp is working properly
    between the two machines, I sftp'ed in as myself
    without any problem.

        mcnally@radius:~$ sftp mcnally@cyberspace.org
        mcnally@cyberspace.org's password:
        sftp> quit

    One thing that I thought was quite odd is that while
    editing the account as root, the password field in the
    /etc/passwd entry for mnac is a great deal longer than
    for any of the other accounts around it in the password
    file.  E.g.:

        iggy:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:8442:1002::0:0:igor von
        heiniken:/a/i/g/iggy:/usr/local/bin/bbssh
          marcvh:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:8451:1002::0:0:Marc
        VanHeyningen:/c/m/a/marcvh:/bin/bash
             fitz:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:8880:1002::0:0:Scotch! Cigars!
        Coffee!:/c/f/i/fitz:/bin/csh
             gull:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:9062:1002::0:0:David
        Brodbeck,Ann Arbor MI:/a/g/u/gull:/bin/bash
            mnac:yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy:92
        80:1002::0:0:MNAC:/a/m/n/mnac:/bin/tcsh

    The other nearby entries in the password file have
    encrypted password hashes that are 28 characters long.
    The mnac account has a 60-character long password hash.

    Can anyone familiar with the password scheme we're using
    tell me why that should be the case and/or whether it has
    any bearing on the matter at hand?
rcurl
response 186 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 23 18:23 UTC 2006

"if Rane is not seeing such a message he must be using the right password" 
Yes, I was using the right pw, by this test.
gayniggerassociation
response 187 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 23 20:50 UTC 2006

GNAA GNAA GNAAGNAA GNAA GNAAGNAA GNAA GNAAGNAA GNAA GNAAGNAA GNAA GNAAGNAA
GNAA GNAA
rcurl
response 188 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 23 21:54 UTC 2006

Why can't these jerks be stopped? 
nharmon
response 189 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 23 21:58 UTC 2006

They can, but the methods of doing so are not very comfortable.
scholar
response 190 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 23 22:07 UTC 2006

re. 188:  why don't you respond to every post they make with 'jerk'?  it's
always worked in the past, hasn't it?
rcurl
response 191 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 23 22:25 UTC 2006

Yes, it has. However I don't think these new jerks read the conferences. 
scholar
response 192 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 23 23:33 UTC 2006

you'll never know until you try.
rcurl
response 193 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 24 01:57 UTC 2006

Re #185: that is *really* weird: the wrong pw gets a message to try again,
but the right pw disconnects! Can what happens when using the right pw be
logged?
slynne
response 194 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 24 02:07 UTC 2006

There really dont seem to be any good methods for dealing with this type
of vandal. We discussed some ideas at the board meeting but none are
likely to be effective. It kind of sucks. 
naftee
response 195 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 24 02:30 UTC 2006

you guys are like the government :(
cyklone
response 196 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 24 03:10 UTC 2006

On the bright side, the GNAA posts make trap look a lot less offensive 
(unless he's behind the latest them).

keesan
response 197 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 24 04:38 UTC 2006

Can we discontinue newuser telnet/ssh access for a while, or is it also
possible to post 149 copies of trash via the web?  

Can someone pick up the droppings in such a manner that they don't leave blank
spots that appear in all the items for the rest of us (which is the problem
with the twit filter).
keesan
response 198 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 24 04:39 UTC 2006

Is it possible to 'browse new since 17:00' and if so how?
nharmon
response 199 of 333: Mark Unseen   May 24 12:27 UTC 2006

The conspiracy theorist inside of me tells me that the person behind 
these postings was an advocate for closing newuser on Grex and making 
it member-only.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-333      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss