|
Grex > Helpers > #123: Grex System Problems - Fall 2003 |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 291 responses total. |
gelinas
|
|
response 175 of 291:
| 
Nov 25 19:35 UTC 2003 |
From the previous agora:
} #234 of 234: by Joshua (jhudson) on Tue, Nov 25, 2003 (10:33):
} We will have to put a kludge in it as cyberspace.org sometimes ends
} up on various spamblock lists. Might be worth considering though.
|
naftee
|
|
response 176 of 291:
|
Nov 30 01:09 UTC 2003 |
Help! Jan Wolter's test backtalk site is nonexistant!
|
dcat
|
|
response 177 of 291:
|
Nov 30 05:01 UTC 2003 |
Help! Jim Daloonik's forebrain is nonexistant!
|
other
|
|
response 178 of 291:
|
Nov 30 20:53 UTC 2003 |
HAHAHAHAHAHA-SPLONK@! <lmao>
|
willcome
|
|
response 179 of 291:
|
Nov 30 22:57 UTC 2003 |
AHAHANH DCAT"S FORESKIN IS NONEXISTANT! AHAHAHaha
GOOD ONE< OTHER
|
naftee
|
|
response 180 of 291:
|
Dec 1 03:48 UTC 2003 |
AHAHAHAHAH DCAT"S GOT SOME FORESHORTENING IN HIS DICK AHAHAHAHA () WHAT A
SPANKER>
|
willcome
|
|
response 181 of 291:
|
Dec 1 03:51 UTC 2003 |
AHAHAHa
|
other
|
|
response 182 of 291:
|
Dec 1 04:05 UTC 2003 |
FOAD
|
willcome
|
|
response 183 of 291:
|
Dec 1 04:06 UTC 2003 |
TOAD!
AHAHAha
|
naftee
|
|
response 184 of 291:
|
Dec 1 04:09 UTC 2003 |
SMOTHER MY MOTHER, OTHER! AHAHAHAA
|
willcome
|
|
response 185 of 291:
|
Dec 1 04:10 UTC 2003 |
AHAHAHA!
|
naftee
|
|
response 186 of 291:
|
Dec 1 04:14 UTC 2003 |
BUNCHA _ HOOLIGANS THESE GUYS
root Operator Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
woot STeve Andre's root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
gcoot Greg Cronau's root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
noot Scott Helmke's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
hoot Rob Henderson's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
zoot Valerie Mates's root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
joot John Remmers' root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
loot Mike O'Leary's root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
moot Mic's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
foot Marcus Watt's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
soot Steve Weiss's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
coot Jan Wolter's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
scoot Steve Gibbard's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
doot Daniel Gryniewicz's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
koot Jeff Kaplan's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
|
gull
|
|
response 187 of 291:
|
Dec 1 15:20 UTC 2003 |
w00t
|
null
|
|
response 188 of 291:
|
Dec 1 19:38 UTC 2003 |
I was getting this earlier when logging in with ssh:
Server refused to allocate pty
Warning: no access to tty; thus no job control in this shell...
mesg: I/O stream 2 improperly redirected
stty: TCGETS: Operation not supported on socket
stty: standard input: Operation not supported on socket
stty: standard input: Operation not supported on socket
mesg: I/O stream 2 improperly redirected
There were approximately 39 people on at the time.
|
scott
|
|
response 189 of 291:
|
Dec 1 20:49 UTC 2003 |
Yeah, that just happens now and then. Often when Grex is heavily loaded.
|
gull
|
|
response 190 of 291:
|
Dec 1 21:09 UTC 2003 |
You'll get 'refused to allocate pty' any time there's a telnet queue.
Will NextGrex still be restricted this way, or will we be ditching the
telnet queue when we move?
|
null
|
|
response 191 of 291:
|
Dec 1 22:23 UTC 2003 |
I thought the telnet queue starts much higher than around 39 users.
Isn't it around 80?
|
gelinas
|
|
response 192 of 291:
|
Dec 1 23:18 UTC 2003 |
Seventy-two. However, there seem to be certain circumstances that will create
a queue with fewer than seventy users logged on.
|
naftee
|
|
response 193 of 291:
|
Dec 3 04:15 UTC 2003 |
GreX IS THE DEVIL!!!
bash-2.05$ uptime
11:15pm up 49 days, 13:13, 42 users, load average: 6.66, 5.90, 5.60
|
willcome
|
|
response 194 of 291:
|
Dec 3 04:50 UTC 2003 |
HEAL!
|
gull
|
|
response 195 of 291:
|
Dec 3 14:48 UTC 2003 |
6.66, 1/100th of the beast?
|
naftee
|
|
response 196 of 291:
|
Dec 3 16:15 UTC 2003 |
It's the closest we could get.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 197 of 291:
|
Dec 3 20:26 UTC 2003 |
Grex: 99% less evil than AOL.
|
twenex
|
|
response 198 of 291:
|
Dec 3 21:28 UTC 2003 |
The simulator on the GE 635 for the new Multics machine
(codenamed the 636) ws called 6.36, because it ran at a tenth
the speed of the eventual 645.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 199 of 291:
|
Dec 3 22:35 UTC 2003 |
Shouldn't it, then, have been the 63.6 (or perhaps 64.5)?
|