You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   144-168   169-193   194-218 
 219-243   244-268   269-293   294-318   319-335      
 
Author Message
25 new of 335 responses total.
other
response 169 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 15:29 UTC 2001

Grex's established procedures for board meeting and decision making are 
what they are, in my opinion, because of the belief that the quality of 
the discussion and the decisions made will be sufficiently better to 
justify the additional effort.  In my opinion, the status quo is what it 
is because the founders knew it would be better for Grex this way.

I do not believe this has changed, and I believe the 'candidacy' of jp2 
is a perfect example of why the status quo is simply superior to other 
options at this time.
aruba
response 170 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 15:31 UTC 2001

I think we are all about community.  Part of the way the Grex community
interacts has always been face-to-face, and I for one think it's an
essential part: I would never have become very involved with Grex if I
hadn't seen the possibility of meeting people face-to-face.

I have no objection to totally online communities like The River, but they
don't really interest me much, either.  I like the fact that the Grex
community straddles the line between cyberspace and meatspace.

I think I could jump over a candlestick if I had a running start.
jp2
response 171 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 15:31 UTC 2001

This response has been erased.

aruba
response 172 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 15:32 UTC 2001

Eric slipped in - #170 was a response to #168.
jp2
response 173 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 15:33 UTC 2001

This response has been erased.

other
response 174 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 15:42 UTC 2001

Our very existence contravenes your suggestion that Grex does not believe 
in online communications.  However, the management/oversight of our 
organization is better served by a higher level of communication in the 
decision making process than is presently available remotely without 
current technological and financial resources.
other
response 175 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 15:42 UTC 2001

in the above...

        :/without/with our 
jp2
response 176 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 15:53 UTC 2001

This response has been erased.

gull
response 177 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 15:59 UTC 2001

Re #171: It's possible to believe in online communication without 
believing it's ideal for every situation.  (I believe that screwdrivers 
are useful, but I do not use them to hammer nails.)

For example, I communicate online a lot, so I suppose I "believe in 
it."  But I've also seen long, bitter online arguments solved by a few 
minutes of face-to-face conversation, or in some cases even telephone 
conversation.  There's just no substitute for the emotional feedback 
you get from seeing the other person's face or hearing their voice.  
Online it's just too easy to forget that the other person has feelings, 
or to mistake their tone of voice for something other than it is.  In 
general people tend to seem colder and more sarcastic online, which 
leads to a lot of unnecessary defensiveness.
jp2
response 178 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 16:05 UTC 2001

This response has been erased.

aruba
response 179 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 16:13 UTC 2001

I couldn't agree more with #177.  Well put.
keesan
response 180 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 16:14 UTC 2001

There are some people (autistic, etc.) who do better communicating via one
sense at a time.  The sensory overload of face to face communication is too
much for them to handle.  They have trouble dealing with the words and the
emotions at the same time.
anderyn
response 181 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 16:14 UTC 2001

This response has been erased.

tfbjr
response 182 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 16:20 UTC 2001

Do you really believe that personality issues do not matter?

One Fortune 500 company I worked for had a very harsh VP.  He stepped on too
many toes, and was escorted out by security one day after stepping on the
wrong toes.

Build your platform, then.  Be *concrete* and explain how you are an asset.
jp2
response 183 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 16:36 UTC 2001

This response has been erased.

aruba
response 184 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 16:54 UTC 2001

What kind of advertising do you have in mind?
jp2
response 185 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 17:06 UTC 2001

This response has been erased.

other
response 186 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 19:05 UTC 2001

re #180  Are you suggesting that jp2 is autistic?  That might explain 
some things...

re #176 
> Now, I would like to know if someone can explain what makes Grex so 
> special that the same management techniques that companies like IBM, 
> Microsoft, GM, and others use to run their business cannot work here.

Well, now.  I suppose that if you had actually *read* what you are 
claiming to be responding to, you have noticed the part about "our 
current technological and financial resources" determining the parameters 
within which we will meet.  I did not suggest that remote meeting would 
be impossible if we had the resources of the megacorps you use as 
examples.

re # 185  The supposed 'logic' behind your suggestion for joint 
memberships has in earlier discussions proven so thoroughly deficient 
that it is not even worth further response.

Jamie, I have to say that I do hope you will continue to voice your 
opinions on Grex, as that is the surest possible way to assure that you 
will never have any significant impact upon our policy or management 
practices, except possibly to reinforce our perceptions of the decisions 
we have made as being the correct ones.
jp2
response 187 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 19:23 UTC 2001

This response has been erased.

jp2
response 188 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 19:25 UTC 2001

This response has been erased.

other
response 189 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 20:00 UTC 2001

I suppose you would be willing to cover the cost of a portable 100Mbps 
real-time, full-screen videoconferencing setup?  I'd like to see that.
jp2
response 190 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 20:00 UTC 2001

This response has been erased.

other
response 191 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 20:07 UTC 2001

Inadequate to the purpose.
jp2
response 192 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 20:09 UTC 2001

This response has been erased.

other
response 193 of 335: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 20:10 UTC 2001

Inadequate to the purpose for Grex.  We're not talking about M-Net.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   144-168   169-193   194-218 
 219-243   244-268   269-293   294-318   319-335      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss