|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 203 responses total. |
keesan
|
|
response 163 of 203:
| 
Feb 18 21:16 UTC 2007 |
I can't find a binary for anything older than Slackware 10.2. Source is 11MB
bz2. A list of supported applications includes WORD97 and 2000.
|
cross
|
|
response 164 of 203:
|
Feb 18 21:37 UTC 2007 |
Regarding #161; Err, that's kind of illegal.
|
maus
|
|
response 165 of 203:
|
Feb 18 23:48 UTC 2007 |
Can you give me a bit more information about the boxes besides the max
drive size? Are the PCI-based? What brand of NIC do they use? I may be
able to throw together a nice image that you can toast onto a bunch of
CF cards or small drives, and be done. I will probably base it off of a
standard version of Slack 11 or something else "normal" and
well-known/well-supported.
|
twenex
|
|
response 166 of 203:
|
Feb 19 00:33 UTC 2007 |
Now Jeff understands that Sindi needs to install Windows for some users, but
agrees at least provisionally with Dan that the way Sindi is "procuring" Win98
at least MAY be illegal.
Jeff hopes Dan notices that Jeff has now started calling Dan "Dan," and is
pleased.
I am going to stop the irritating parodic third-person nonsense now.
|
cross
|
|
response 167 of 203:
|
Feb 19 00:59 UTC 2007 |
Dan notices and Dan appreciates. And now I will also knock off all the 3rd
Party nonsense.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 168 of 203:
|
Feb 19 01:30 UTC 2007 |
Sindi might not think she is doing any harm pirating Windows for people
but the fact is Microsoft regularly goes after people who do so. How
they do it is offer free copies of properly licensed Windows in exchange
for the names and addresses of the people who install the pirated software.
|
edina
|
|
response 169 of 203:
|
Feb 19 01:47 UTC 2007 |
re 167 Brooke would like it better if Dan started referring to
himself as "The Dan".
|
cross
|
|
response 170 of 203:
|
Feb 19 02:06 UTC 2007 |
Sort of like, ``The Donald''?
``Rosie's a slob!''
|
edina
|
|
response 171 of 203:
|
Feb 19 02:12 UTC 2007 |
Exactly!! Please Jesus let your hair be better.....
|
cross
|
|
response 172 of 203:
|
Feb 19 02:12 UTC 2007 |
Oh yes; don't worry, my hair is better than The Donald's comb-over.
|
keesan
|
|
response 173 of 203:
|
Feb 19 03:40 UTC 2007 |
Re 165 (?) from maus Are you offering to put together some small linux that
I can transfer via some external drive (I have a USB external drive and a 1GB
USB flash drive) that will run Opera and also WORD under WINE? That fits in
500MB? This particular computer has 2 PCI slots and I put a video card into
one of them (rather than dealing with an odd driver that I might have to
compile). No network card. Eventually an external modem. I was told not
to put any more work into it right now. It was supposed to be for the
to-be-ex-wife of a friend and we will see if she even wants to use the linux
part of it for the internet. He says she is rarely satisfied with anything
he gives her. He is delighted with the linux/opera I put on his computer.
By great good fortune he already has a Lucent modem in there which worked with
ltmodem.o driver. My two lucent modems did not.
If she does not like linux, I will let him put Win98 and WORD on the drive
after removing linux and enlarging the Win98 partition.
I installed Slackware 10.1 or 10.2 on one computer and it immediately filled
up at least 1GB in a minimal installation, and wasted 64MB of RAM on running
unneeded daemons. It had several pages of config file for X. I am using
a generic Xvesa driver with no config file.
|
cross
|
|
response 174 of 203:
|
Feb 19 03:45 UTC 2007 |
(Her not being satisfied with things he gives her might have more to do with
the fact that she is a soon-to-be-ex-wife than that she is not satisfied with
those things. And perhaps, vice versa.)
|
keesan
|
|
response 175 of 203:
|
Feb 19 16:04 UTC 2007 |
Vice versa. Today someone brought us 9 64MB and 4 128MB SIMMs so we could
actually put together computers with 128MB RAM and Ubuntu (if we had lots of
large hard disks - it demands 2GB) but Ubuntu is slower. He also brought four
SIMMS (two labelled 64MB) that have two little slots very close to each other
just off of center, with no chips on two (just greenboard) and some metal
cased thing on the other two. ??? And a no-name motherboard with onboard
i810 video sound and only three slots to replace them with. No ISA and we
are out of extra external modems. Anyone have 28.8K or 33.6K they don't want?
|
maus
|
|
response 176 of 203:
|
Feb 19 19:32 UTC 2007 |
I will look into creating an image for this. In my past experience, the
basic load of Slackware was pretty small and light. If it has grown over
the years, you would be better off using a decently sized drive to
accomodate a reasonable distribution of Linux.
|
keesan
|
|
response 177 of 203:
|
Feb 19 20:13 UTC 2007 |
I am putting linux on the hardware that we have and do not want a distribution
of linux, just enough files to dial and run Opera. The standard Slackware
puts on all sorts of unwanted things. Wait on this project to see if the
person getting the latest computer really wants linux. Why an image file
rather than a .tgz? What kernel does the Slackware 11 glibc require? The
glibc from Slackware 9.1 insisted on a kernel 2.4, which I have compiled.
A lot of the reason why the later kernels are larger is they support newer
hardware, and I am using Slackware 4 or earlier age hardware.
|
cross
|
|
response 178 of 203:
|
Feb 19 20:27 UTC 2007 |
The Linux pundits will tell you until they are blue in the face that the
kernel is actually very small and that all the support for newer hardware is
done via kernel modules; so supporting older systems in a small amount of
space is trivial: just delete the modules you don't need.
The reason you may want to do this is because giving someone Windows 98 and
Office 98 is illegal.
|
jep
|
|
response 179 of 203:
|
Feb 19 21:27 UTC 2007 |
Dan: I refer to people by loginid because it is unique. There are other
people here called "Dan" but no others called "cross".
|
cross
|
|
response 180 of 203:
|
Feb 19 21:32 UTC 2007 |
That's fine, I guess.
|
keesan
|
|
response 181 of 203:
|
Feb 20 00:07 UTC 2007 |
The kernel that comes with my linux is about 400K. The standard Slackware
2.2.16 kernel is about 1GB. How big is 2.6?
The person getting the latest computer has their own OEM copies of 98 and
OFFICE.
The later libraries are a lot bigger.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 182 of 203:
|
Feb 20 02:00 UTC 2007 |
re #181: surely you mean 1MB, and not 1GB.
on my Ubuntu laptop, my untrimmed kernel is about 1.2MB.
mcnally@skookum:~$ ls -l /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.12-10-386
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1207281 2007-02-06 20:04 /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.12-10-386
|
keesan
|
|
response 183 of 203:
|
Feb 20 03:50 UTC 2007 |
1MB, of course. Is 2.6 less buggy than 2.4?
My custom kernel, with modular support for sound, framebuffer, usb, and scsi,
is 700K (2.4.31). The generic kernel that came with my linux is 430K.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 184 of 203:
|
Feb 20 06:47 UTC 2007 |
> Is 2.6 less buggy than 2.4?
I have no idea how to answer that. Which version of 2.4?
Which version of 2.6? Which bugs?
|
keesan
|
|
response 185 of 203:
|
Feb 20 15:45 UTC 2007 |
2.4.31, latest 2.6. 2.4.31 has a few problems. Can't load usb_serial as a
module (has to be built-in). Have to load gameport.o for some sound cards
to work even though it is not listed in modules.dep. Why are you using 2.6?
|
maus
|
|
response 186 of 203:
|
Feb 20 16:01 UTC 2007 |
2.6 is what most distributions ship with. Besides working better with
desktop-type hardware, it allows device-name persistence for
hot-pluggable devices, hot-plug capabilities for PCI boards (PCI, PCI-X
and Compact PCI) which allows live repairs and newer ones offer
kdump/kexec functionality. Aside from that, it is actively developed and
*supported* by Linux distributors. There are a few problems, to be sure;
namely, the OOM-killer behaves badly and can cut off access to the box
entirely (bigger problem on overloaded servers) and the memory
oversubscription is a little flaky, leading to the OOM-Killer being
called. Both of these are tunable parameters, though, and
oversubscription can be turned off and OOM-killer can be made more sane
or shut off entirely. Additionally, the t3 driver (Tigon gigabit
ethernet driver) is fucking nuts and can cause stability problems in
kernel-space (I have seen one box freak out multiple times in a day when
under heavy network load using a NIC that is run by the t3 driver --
customer was very *NOT HAPPY* and we wound up disabling the t3 NIC and
adding an Intel PRO/1000 NIC board and all was happy).
|
maus
|
|
response 187 of 203:
|
Feb 20 16:02 UTC 2007 |
Wow, I probably should have broken that into a couple of paragraphs.
|
