|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 293 responses total. |
jp2
|
|
response 162 of 293:
| 
Aug 4 21:28 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 163 of 293:
|
Aug 5 00:13 UTC 2002 |
Grex was slashdotted?
|
gelinas
|
|
response 164 of 293:
|
Aug 5 01:37 UTC 2002 |
That's JP's interpretation of the situation.
But who, besides grexers, would note a DoS against M-Net?
|
keesan
|
|
response 165 of 293:
|
Aug 5 02:22 UTC 2002 |
Dialing works okay now.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 166 of 293:
|
Aug 5 02:59 UTC 2002 |
Re #164: MNetters. Like me.
|
jp2
|
|
response 167 of 293:
|
Aug 5 03:41 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 168 of 293:
|
Aug 5 04:03 UTC 2002 |
(I know, Joe; 'twas a poor attempt at a joke.)
|
gelinas
|
|
response 169 of 293:
|
Aug 8 03:04 UTC 2002 |
Hmm... with 37 people on, I'm 5th in the telnet queue.
|
richard
|
|
response 170 of 293:
|
Aug 8 05:55 UTC 2002 |
is grex a little slow tonight?
|
void
|
|
response 171 of 293:
|
Aug 8 19:10 UTC 2002 |
Some e-mail sent to me on Tuesday still has not arrived.
|
goose
|
|
response 172 of 293:
|
Aug 9 19:44 UTC 2002 |
Occasionally I get this when logging in, but not always:
Warning: Server lies about size of server public key: actual size is 767 bits
vs. announced 768.
Warning: This may be due to an old implementation of ssh.
So is it my ssh that may be outdated?
|
goose
|
|
response 173 of 293:
|
Aug 9 19:45 UTC 2002 |
Oh yeah, and why only on certain ports or at certain times (I'm not sure which
it is)
|
gelinas
|
|
response 174 of 293:
|
Aug 10 01:36 UTC 2002 |
I've thought it was the grex sshd. I don't worry about it, though.
|
goose
|
|
response 175 of 293:
|
Aug 10 05:05 UTC 2002 |
Neither do I, but I'd been seeing it for a while and thought I'd finally bring
it up. I did find it interesting though that it doesn't always happen.
|
pvn
|
|
response 176 of 293:
|
Aug 10 06:55 UTC 2002 |
Well, do you start counting at 0 or 1?
|
hash
|
|
response 177 of 293:
|
Aug 15 17:16 UTC 2002 |
so, I was reading agora and I got kicked off for being idle.
my conference activity wasn't saved which annoyed me highly.
so, I put 'set save' in my .cfonce, and 'lo and behold, picospan segfaults
when you do something as preposterous as that.
|
hash
|
|
response 178 of 293:
|
Aug 15 17:23 UTC 2002 |
is it 'set autosave' ? that doesn't seem to segfault.
I'm still trying to figure out why 'set save' segfaults but really no other
set commands or random strings do.
|
carson
|
|
response 179 of 293:
|
Aug 15 17:23 UTC 2002 |
(try "set autosave" instead.)
|
rksjr
|
|
response 180 of 293:
|
Aug 19 02:07 UTC 2002 |
A grexer sent e-mail to me last Wednesday, however, I did
not receive the "you have new mail" notice until today
(Sunday, sometime between 9:40 am and 7:19 pm), and I have
logged on five times since Wednesday. Does the "you have new
mail" notice appear only when e-mail arrives from outside of
the Grex system?
|
mdw
|
|
response 181 of 293:
|
Aug 19 23:30 UTC 2002 |
Nope. What is the timestamp in the "From" line at the start of this
message in your mailbox? That time should be the time that the mail was
actually delivered to your mailbox, which should be closely correlated
to when you see "You have new mail", if you're logged in and not idle.
That time should also be later than the timestamps in the "Received"
headers, which should track where mail was received by intermediate
points, which is typically where mail delivery delays happen.
|
rksjr
|
|
response 182 of 293:
|
Aug 20 21:24 UTC 2002 |
Re #181: Even viewing Pine's "Display of full headers", I
can see nothing in the "From:" line after "...@cyberspace.org>".
|
gelinas
|
|
response 183 of 293:
|
Aug 21 02:37 UTC 2002 |
It's not "From:" it's "From ". However, pine may be showing it as
"Return-Path:". In which case, look at the time in the next line, which
should begin "Received:". Comparing that time with the time in each of the
following "Received:" lines should show where the delay occurred.
|
carson
|
|
response 184 of 293:
|
Aug 21 02:37 UTC 2002 |
(nothing at the VERY top of the message? just above the "Return-Path:"
line? there's actually two "From:" lines in every e-mail, and the one to
which Marcus refers should be at the very beginning of the message.)
|
carson
|
|
response 185 of 293:
|
Aug 21 02:38 UTC 2002 |
(Joe slipped in, and is more correct than I in stating that it's a "From"
line and not a "From:" line. confused yet?) :)
|
rksjr
|
|
response 186 of 293:
|
Aug 21 03:34 UTC 2002 |
I think I've found the "from" line everyone is referring
to, i.e. the line which begins "Received: (from".
The following is the Pine "Display of full headers" for
the e-mail in consideration with the sender's name and
userid replaced by "[name]" and "[userid]" and the subject
line erased:
Received: (from [userid]@localhost) by grex.cyberspace.org
(8.6.13/8.6.12) id
LAA19150 for rksjr@grex.cyberspace.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2002
11:08:56 -0400
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:08:56 -0400
From: [name] <[userid]@cyberspace.org>
Message-Id: <200208141508.LAA19150@grex.cyberspace.org>
To: rksjr@grex.cyberspace.org
Subject: [subject line erased]
|
