|
Grex > Cinema > #44: Movie Reviews for the Summer of 2001 |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 284 responses total. |
ashke
|
|
response 162 of 284:
|
Jul 31 09:11 UTC 2001 |
I read the book of "Road to Wellville" while I was living in Grand Rapids,
before I saw the movie. While they glossed over some parts of it, the book
was a lot more fact than satire. I think that made it all the better :)
I read quite a few that are books made into movies, and less regularly, movies
made into books. I tend to get angry at older books that are made into
movies, and the screenwriter and or director chooses to ignore the direction,
plot, or even the idea of the book when making the movie. Including the X-Men
movie, where they decided to hell and high water with any history, he made
it what he wanted.
The best adaptations I have seen, have been 3 Stephen King novels made into
movies: The Green Mile, Shawshank Redemption (both adapted by the same
person), and Apt Pupil. The other King movies were good too, like The Stand,
Stand by Me, but some REALLY stunk, like Tommyknockers and Langoliers.
|
eeyore
|
|
response 163 of 284:
|
Jul 31 12:51 UTC 2001 |
Hearts in Atlantis is coming out, with Anthony Hopkins.
|
brighn
|
|
response 164 of 284:
|
Jul 31 13:19 UTC 2001 |
A friend and I were just talking about XMen, ironically enough. Our assessment
was the opposite: We prefer movies based on comic books when they're based
on new plots and history, like XMen and Batman, then when they're just
rehashes, like Superman. I don't see what the beef is, when the comic book
writers themselves re-invent major components of history of five years
(Magneto just introduced himself to Spiderman in the newspaper strip, for
instance).
|
lynne
|
|
response 165 of 284:
|
Jul 31 14:36 UTC 2001 |
I really hated the book for Hearts in Atlantis. It told what were basically
three very very loosely connected stories...actually, it didn't even tell
stories, but just followed characters for a while with no real plot or
resolution. I can't imagine what they did to it to come out with a movie.
|
ric
|
|
response 166 of 284:
|
Jul 31 19:22 UTC 2001 |
Tommyknockers was a terrrible movie. Even for those who didn't read the book
My wife liked X-Men the movie a lot, and she was an avid reader of the comic,
and has some x-men action figures from a long time ago.
|
senna
|
|
response 167 of 284:
|
Jul 31 19:48 UTC 2001 |
X-men did a very good job, I felt. It would be difficult for anybody not of
immense budgetary means to keep up with all the backstory, so side projects
of X-men inevitably reinvent everything. The television show, for instance.
For the most part, everything they put into the movie was well done, and they
didn't overload us with information that would have done no good.
I was expecting it to suck, and it didn't. Bravo. Batman, in theory, could
just rehash what's known, because there's a lot less happening than in X-men
(this isn't an insult, just an observation. It's a lot easier to follow one
character than an everchanging cast of, literally, hundreds). After the
plunge the series took, though, future Batman movies would have to be yet
another reinvention.
|
edina
|
|
response 168 of 284:
|
Aug 1 14:10 UTC 2001 |
FYI, to my knowledge, eeryone that signed on for X-Men signed on for two
sequels if the first was successful. So at least they'll keep continuity.
|
mooncat
|
|
response 169 of 284:
|
Aug 1 16:19 UTC 2001 |
That's just cool. :)
|
ric
|
|
response 170 of 284:
|
Aug 1 21:16 UTC 2001 |
I just rented "Wild Things" on DVD... can't wait to watch it. Also, recent
additions to my DVD collection include "V" the tv miniseries (not the show),
and Kenneth Brannaugh's version of "Othello"
|
ashke
|
|
response 171 of 284:
|
Aug 1 21:54 UTC 2001 |
You have "V"??? I'm SO jealous! I remember watching that on TV when the
mini-series first came out...
I watched "Cast Away" and "The Wedding Planner" on DVD this morning. Cast
Away was good, but it wasn't great. Parts were funny and interesting, and
the effects were good, but it didn't grab me like I hoped,, an had been told
it would.
Wedding Planner has Jennifer Lopez and Matthew McConnoghey, and I'm not sure
if I liked it either. Again, it had parts that were funny, but the core of
the relationships in this bothered me. A lot of it was to do with the
relationship of these two, or rather attraction of them, even though he is
engaged to Bridgette Wilson-Sampras and Lopez is hired to plan their wedding.
While parts were funny, it still had the slimy quality of the groom to be
cheating, lying to his fioncee, amongst other things. Blah...
|
orinoco
|
|
response 172 of 284:
|
Aug 2 04:19 UTC 2001 |
"V" as in the Pynchon novel?
|
swa
|
|
response 173 of 284:
|
Aug 2 05:26 UTC 2001 |
Speaking of characters wandering around without a plot... <shudder>
I appear to have seen only four John Cusack movies: High Fidelity, Bullets Over
Broadway, Grosse Pointe Blank, and Better Off Dead. (No, I haven't seen "Being
John Malkovich," and yes, I'm aware that even Amish people who don't use
electricity have seen it. I haven't seen "American Beauty" either. I tend to
see really, really hyped movies -- think "Jurassic Park" and "Braveheart" --
about a year or three after they come out, generally under duress.) I think
it's a sign of how neat he is that I'd thought I'd seen several more than
that... he's been the best thing about each of his films.
|
ric
|
|
response 174 of 284:
|
Aug 2 13:00 UTC 2001 |
re 172 - perhaps, but "V" more popularly known as the TV miniseries from the
1980's, about the alien visitors that are actuall here to harvest humans for
food.. they're somewhat lizard like underneath.
|
brighn
|
|
response 175 of 284:
|
Aug 2 13:46 UTC 2001 |
I thought "V" was about aliens who come to earth to force everyone to use cell
phone services.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 176 of 284:
|
Aug 2 13:48 UTC 2001 |
As long as nobody's running a ministry for the rats in the New York sewers,
I'm fine with it.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 177 of 284:
|
Aug 2 16:02 UTC 2001 |
I have just seen that Star Wars, Phantom Menance will be out
on DVD October 16; Disney's Snow White October 9 and Dumbo on October
23.
|
brighn
|
|
response 178 of 284:
|
Aug 2 17:45 UTC 2001 |
Here's an interesting tidbit... as things stand right now, the top grossing
movie four years in a row will feature a green creature (Star Wars 1, Grinch,
Shrek, Star Wars 2). That's of course making the twin assumptions that nothing
will come along for the rest of the summer to knock Shrek out, and that Star
Wars 2 will follow the trend of the other four movies (which may not be a
completely safe assumption, although rumors have it that The Matrix 2's
release date was postponed several months because they didn't want to go up
against Lucas' monolith).
Just thought that was weird. =} Unless you count gangrene in Private Ryan and
the Green Monster of Jealousy, aka Winslet's fiance in Titanic, that's it for
the trend.
|
brighn
|
|
response 179 of 284:
|
Aug 2 17:58 UTC 2001 |
Hey, maybe there's a trend here after all. Top grossing movie of each year:
Shrek (01) [so far] -- green hero
How the Grinch Stole Christmas (00) -- green antihero
Star Wars Episode 1 (99) -- green guru
Saving Private Ryan (98) -- no green, but Tom Hanks
Titanic (97) -- green monster of jealousy ;}
Independence Day (96) -- little green men from mars (ok, I don't think they
were really green, but I'm having fun here)
Toy Story (95) -- He has been chosen! Green aliens had a bit part, but stole
the show
forrest Gump (94) -- If we can't have green, give us Hanks!
Jurassic Park (93) -- Big green dinos
Alladin (92) -- Blue. Dang. And I thought I had something.
Terminator 2 (91) -- Help! My whole theory's falling apart.
Home Alone (90) -- New theory: filmmakers discovered the Green Gene in 1993.
Batman (89) -- GREEN! YAY!
Rain Man (88) -- No green, but this one's not even in the top 50 films anymore
(it's 58)
1987: Not even on Movieweb's top 50 (well, 59 now)
Crocodile Dundee (86) -- Crocodiles are green, ain't they? ;}
1985: All right, this one's not here either, so I'll quit now... besides, 1984
is Indiana Jones, and there's no green there, either.
|
mooncat
|
|
response 180 of 284:
|
Aug 2 18:08 UTC 2001 |
<giggles> Good theory Brighn. :)
|
ashke
|
|
response 181 of 284:
|
Aug 2 19:31 UTC 2001 |
I'm glad you're on our side, brighn... That brilliance is dangerous :)
|
tpryan
|
|
response 182 of 284:
|
Aug 2 22:02 UTC 2001 |
Maybe it's time for Kermit to make that big movie!
|
albaugh
|
|
response 183 of 284:
|
Aug 2 22:29 UTC 2001 |
Re: Rain Man in '88 - Tom Cruise was in it, and he was also in The Color of
Money, which is, as we all know, ... ;-)
|
orinoco
|
|
response 184 of 284:
|
Aug 3 05:55 UTC 2001 |
You could get some good milage from ranking non-standard hero skin colors
(green for Shrek, blue for the Genie, silver for the molten-metal Terminator,
and so on) against each other. I imagine green might well come out on top.
|
brighn
|
|
response 185 of 284:
|
Aug 3 14:16 UTC 2001 |
Heh. Bright white for Castaway, but that got beaten out anyway. ;}
Saw "Angel Eyes" last night. Good movie, but what was up with the advertising?
We went (dollar show) because we were looking for a thriller, and all the
teasers and adverts I'd seen made it look like a stalker movie (like "The
Watcher," although I haven't seen that yet, so maybe THAT's wrong, too ;} ).
It was a *gasp* chick flick! A relatively mature and serious one, at that,
although moments of unmitigated touchy-feely smarm (requisite in a chick
flick) were provided by Catch's mother-in-law. Also interesting was the
casting of a romantic lead who spends most of the movie looking like the
afore-mentioned and promised psychostalker, instead of the sleek-chic
I'm-too-sexy-for-this-film that's usually picked. The even spend time making
J-Lo look plain enough to be street-pretty instead of "get your jaw off the
floor, boys" beautiful that she really is.
Definitely worth seeing, although there are bits where it drags, and it tries
to be coy about why Catch is interested in J-Lo the Cop, which is silly
because it's obvious from the first scene (the one-year-before prologue).
There are other spots where it tries to be oh-so-coy (the neighbor kid, for
instance), enough to keep it from my full recommendation. If anything, it's
a rare glimpse of "real people" in the chick-flick genre usually reserved for
plasticheads like Hugh Grant (a cute/sexy plastichead, don't get me wrong ;}
).
|
gelinas
|
|
response 186 of 284:
|
Aug 4 04:26 UTC 2001 |
I'm channel-surfing and have run up against a Jackie Chan movie on USA. Came
during a car-chase. Really neat driving. Including getting a car on its side
to move. The fight scenes have been pretty imaginative, too. Coming in in
the middle doesn't give much hope for the plot, but it's Jackie Chan: Who
cares about plot? ;)
(OK. That's a cheap shot: I've never seen, much less watched, a Chan
movie before.)
|