|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 241 responses total. |
flem
|
|
response 162 of 241:
| 
Nov 6 23:54 UTC 1999 |
I saw "Stigmata" at the Fox Village theater yesterday. Not great, but
an enjoyable movie. The Catholic Church plays a large part in this
movie, and for once, was treated with a certain amount of respect and
dignity. The characterization was somewhat half-hearted, especially as
regards motivation, and the main plot device is questionable at best,
but overall, I think this was one of the more enjoyable and original
thrillers that I've seen in a while. A solid B, even with a C- in the
preview metric.
|
remmers
|
|
response 163 of 241:
|
Nov 7 01:28 UTC 1999 |
Re resp:159 - Martin Scorsese also "appears" -- in a sense -- in his
latest film, "Bringing Out the Dead" (now in theaters everywhere).
For 3 trivia points, identify Scorsese's role.
|
danr
|
|
response 164 of 241:
|
Nov 8 00:28 UTC 1999 |
I second the nomination for "Being John Malkovich."
|
bdh3
|
|
response 165 of 241:
|
Nov 8 06:56 UTC 1999 |
Mary Wilson and I watched the ST:NG film - 'Revolution'? or something
like that? - where Picard meets his soul mate. Anyway, its the one
where Data goes 'rogue' and the 'primary directive' is in question.
(No spoilers so far.) The Enterprise jetisons 'warp core' at one point.
They got a new 'core' in this out of the way primitive quadrant or are
they gonna travel back to 'civilization' on 'impulse' alone?
|
yashika
|
|
response 166 of 241:
|
Nov 8 07:03 UTC 1999 |
list
|
omni
|
|
response 167 of 241:
|
Nov 8 09:59 UTC 1999 |
How about a voice on the radio. He "played" a dispatcher.
|
md
|
|
response 168 of 241:
|
Nov 8 13:25 UTC 1999 |
I took my kids to see THREE TO TANGO (B-), because
everything else looked dreary and too long. It turns
out to be the best Mathew Perry movie I've ever seen,
even better than the Windows 95 Video Guide. Perry
himself was not at his best, however. He seemed
piqued at having to do his Chandler Bing character
from "Friends" yet again on the big screen. The
premise -- girl-crazy architect wins $90 mil project
and gets to room with Neve Campbell all because
everyone thinks he's gay -- didn't need the elaborate
and overlong setup it gets. Once it gets going,
though, the writers and director have tremendous
slapstick fun with it for about 45 minutes. Alas,
they then expected me to wipe the tears from my eyes,
clear my throat, sit up straight, and start taking these
cartoon characters and their contrived woes seriously.
There's even a message in there, toward the end, about
how we should accept ourselves and each other for what
we are. Gee, never heard that before, thanks for the
tip. The movie will be much more enjoyable when it
comes out on video and you can fast forward though all
the crap.
|
mooncat
|
|
response 169 of 241:
|
Nov 8 14:09 UTC 1999 |
I have to agree that "Being John Malkovich" is a most fun movie.
I'm not sure I completely agree with Richard's synopsis of it, butI won't get
into that now. The characters are entertaining, and John Malkovich was a
great sport for even just agreeing to this project.
I highly reccomend it.
|
jiffer
|
|
response 170 of 241:
|
Nov 8 19:06 UTC 1999 |
oh! I get to see "Being John Malkovich" tonight! yay!
|
qui1
|
|
response 171 of 241:
|
Nov 9 01:12 UTC 1999 |
Ugh, I saw "The Bone Collector"... bad film. It was a lot like "Seven" and
very predictable. I have been waiting for a good scary movie for quite
some time, I'll keep waiting.
|
aaron
|
|
response 172 of 241:
|
Nov 9 22:21 UTC 1999 |
The Bone Collector was not quite as dark as Seven, but it is safe to say
that if you don't like one, you probably won't like the other. Predictable?
You can predict the plot elements of the ending, yes. This film inspires
the question of what makes for better entertainment -- a movie where you
have enough clues to figure out the ending, where you are not given enough
information to figure it out (but the killer is among the cast of
characters), or where the hunt is for an unknown killer outside the cast
of characters. I think option 1 is best, but it is difficult to pull off.
|
jazz
|
|
response 173 of 241:
|
Nov 10 12:57 UTC 1999 |
"Kiss the Girls" did a fairly good job of that, though it's
storytelling was too disjointed for me to really enjoy the fact.
|
md
|
|
response 174 of 241:
|
Nov 20 15:16 UTC 1999 |
THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH (C) -- I think that was
the title. It's the new James Bond movie, with
an increasingly old-looking Pierce Brosnan, whose
Bond will have to start carrying cyanide
suppositories in a few years, plus Denise Richards
as a nuclear scientist (!), and lots and lots of
explosions and lethal gadgets. It's hard to get
*too* curmudgeonly about such a movie: if you
didn't know what you were getting into when you
bought the ticket, you need to get out more. It
had some respectably tense moments, and the FX are
okay. (This movie is a good litmus test for the
sincerity of your feminist feelings, btw. The more
it pisses you off, the more sincere you are.)
|
jazz
|
|
response 175 of 241:
|
Nov 20 17:06 UTC 1999 |
It's also a good litmus test to see if you're an engineer; the more
improbable bits of the movie seem to you, and that actually bothers you, then
the more you're worthy of the title "engineer". :)
I didn't think TWinE was really that misogynist, though. What'd I
miss?
|
md
|
|
response 176 of 241:
|
Nov 21 01:31 UTC 1999 |
(The way Bond manipulated the nurse into clearing
him for active duty almost pissed me off, for
one thing.)
The science struck me as lame throughout. For
example, that plutonium rod Reynard was wielding
like an oversized aluminum basball bat: how much
would such an object weigh in the real world?
|
jazz
|
|
response 177 of 241:
|
Nov 21 02:06 UTC 1999 |
(it's sufficiently early into the movie and non-germane to the plot
that it should be safe to discuss)
Why would it bother you? I've seen women do the same sorts of things,
in real life, all the time - in fact there are industries based on it.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 178 of 241:
|
Nov 21 04:23 UTC 1999 |
Being John Malkovich (1999)
Rating: Malkovich Malkovich Malkovich Malkovich (out of a possible
Malkovich Malkovich Malkovich Malkovich Malkovich)
Review: Very strange, very funny (if you like absurdist comedy)
film about, well, being John Malkovich. Holds together
surprisingly well given the bizarre premise of the film,
but some parts work better than others. Recommended.
|
drew
|
|
response 179 of 241:
|
Nov 21 04:39 UTC 1999 |
The Bond character is finally showing signs of aging? It's about time.
|
senna
|
|
response 180 of 241:
|
Nov 21 07:37 UTC 1999 |
Do you realize what a powerful advertisement it would be to have James
Bond endorse Viagra?
|
mdw
|
|
response 181 of 241:
|
Nov 21 08:16 UTC 1999 |
I just saw Malkovich. Malkovich malkovich. Malkovich malkovich
malkovich.
|
remmers
|
|
response 182 of 241:
|
Nov 22 11:24 UTC 1999 |
I'll Malcovich the recommendations for "Being John Malkovich". I'll
also state that I didn't realize that Cameron Diaz and Orson Bean --
both of whom I'm familiar with from other movies -- were in the film
until I read the closing credits. And they both have major roles.
(Haven't seen Orson Bean for about 150 years. It's good to know that
he's still around.)
|
remmers
|
|
response 183 of 241:
|
Nov 22 11:27 UTC 1999 |
By the way, the director of "Being John Malkovich" is listed as Spike
Jonze. What else has he done?
|
johnnie
|
|
response 184 of 241:
|
Nov 22 11:47 UTC 1999 |
He's directed a bunch of music videos.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 185 of 241:
|
Nov 22 16:58 UTC 1999 |
Yep, this is his first feature film, so far as I know..
You can see him acting in "Three Kings", where he plays the
ignorant redneck character..
|
omni
|
|
response 186 of 241:
|
Nov 22 19:04 UTC 1999 |
Orson Bean has been busy being the cranky storekeeper on Dr Quinn, Medicine
Woman. I like has work.
|
