|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 18 new of 170 responses total. |
jep
|
|
response 153 of 170:
| 
Jan 15 03:34 UTC 2004 |
re resp:143: I'm really sorry you think I'm rationalizing, and that
there's something wrong with doing that.
I very much don't want my items restored. It's important to me. I am
trying to answer all of the points being made from my perspective.
It's definitely true that I'm trying to serve my own interests.
As a matter of fact, I'm obsessed enough by the issue I've pretty much
stopped logging in to Grex from work, because once I'm here I can't
skip getting involved in it. I come to coop first. I might or might
not read the other conferences before I'm done for the night. I hope
I'll be in bed before 1:00 a.m. -- I'll have a bad day at work if I
don't get some sleep. What you're seeing is what happens when an
obsessive-compulsive type person gets wrapped up in something.
I'm sorry to be annoying to you, though. It's not my intention.
|
jep
|
|
response 154 of 170:
|
Jan 15 03:34 UTC 2004 |
re resp:152: Jamie, item:39 *is* a Grex policy item.
|
naftee
|
|
response 155 of 170:
|
Jan 15 03:38 UTC 2004 |
re 152 jep still seems to think that a permissible precedent was set when
valerie deleted her items, as per response 340 item 68.
I'm not sure if he will ever change his misunderstanding. Maybe he's just
that obsessed.
|
jp2
|
|
response 156 of 170:
|
Jan 15 03:39 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
jp2
|
|
response 157 of 170:
|
Jan 15 03:43 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
kip
|
|
response 158 of 170:
|
Jan 15 15:49 UTC 2004 |
Jamie, as far as I'm concerned, you're welcome to scribble any post you wrote
anywhere on Grex. It's an ability all users have.
What I don't want you to be welcomed to do is remove an entire item, such as
#39 in coop, where others have responded.
My personal opinion is that the items should be restored into some form of
limbo and anyone who wants to scribble their section of it may. I believe
these deletions were a one time occurence and should not be considered the
precedent setting move some others consider it to be.
Just to be perfectly clear, that's my opinion and not the consensus opinion
of the entire staff. That should already be clear, but I'm slowly learning
that what I think is obvious is apparently not obvious to all.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 159 of 170:
|
Jan 15 18:11 UTC 2004 |
I do think a mountain is being made out of a molehill over all this, mostly
due to the practicality that the likeliehood of recurrence is small. And I'll
admit my share of the guilt in that mountain making, by engaging in these
discussions. But I also think that a defacto precedent *was* set, by virtue
that there seems to be no clear policy having been established beforehand to
which people can point and say "valerie clearly and deliberately violated that
policy". Thus until all the proposals currently alive in coop are resolved,
there is at least a theoretical possibility that this same situation could
recur, with all the associated controversy.
|
cross
|
|
response 160 of 170:
|
Jan 15 20:38 UTC 2004 |
It's not the event itself, it's the principle of the matter that's at issue.
|
twinkie
|
|
response 161 of 170:
|
Jan 24 07:48 UTC 2004 |
re: 92 - Cross...was 1996 so good to you that you refuse to leave it?
I've been "flame target of the month" in M-Net's Flame conference for nearly
five years now, M-Net's Twinkie conference is basically a parody of itself...
Is there any particular reason you like to post about me so much? Beyond this,
you've openly theorized in the last Agora that I was "willcome". I'm about
to throw a tantrum to janc proportions, because nobody told me you were saying
mean things about me here on Grex.
|
cross
|
|
response 162 of 170:
|
Jan 24 16:53 UTC 2004 |
92 was entered by krj, not me, twinkie. :-)
|
twinkie
|
|
response 163 of 170:
|
Jan 24 17:26 UTC 2004 |
Meh. 92, 94, close enough.
|
naftee
|
|
response 164 of 170:
|
Jan 24 18:51 UTC 2004 |
TWO GUYS HOT FOR TWINKIE
GROSS
|
styles
|
|
response 165 of 170:
|
Jan 25 03:00 UTC 2004 |
BRING ON THE SNARKY< EH?
|
twinkie
|
|
response 166 of 170:
|
Jan 25 03:03 UTC 2004 |
Oh, the snarky is brought.
|
styles
|
|
response 167 of 170:
|
Jan 25 05:41 UTC 2004 |
looks green :(
|
twinkie
|
|
response 168 of 170:
|
Jan 26 05:11 UTC 2004 |
You're looking in the wrong place, tiger.
|
styles
|
|
response 169 of 170:
|
Jan 26 05:29 UTC 2004 |
:( :( :(
|
jesuit
|
|
response 170 of 170:
|
May 17 02:14 UTC 2006 |
TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
|