|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 188 responses total. |
scott
|
|
response 150 of 188:
|
Dec 5 02:09 UTC 2000 |
Now it's back!
|
sayogyo
|
|
response 151 of 188:
|
Dec 5 08:55 UTC 2000 |
ls
help
|
bdh3
|
|
response 152 of 188:
|
Dec 5 09:12 UTC 2000 |
yep
|
ea
|
|
response 153 of 188:
|
Dec 12 03:36 UTC 2000 |
Earlier this evening, I think the net connection died. There was a
period of 10-15 minutes when I wasn't able to access anything using
BackTalk. I was getting "There was no response from the server"
messages. It was at about 10:00pm, I think.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 154 of 188:
|
Dec 12 03:42 UTC 2000 |
Interesting; I've been connected via telnet since about 21:15.
|
mdw
|
|
response 155 of 188:
|
Dec 12 13:38 UTC 2000 |
Sendmail was down for about 10 minutes this morning, about 8:10a-8:30a.
Ok, 20 minutes. I found a mass mailer, who had managed to queue up 468
messages, and I wanted to move those messages out of the queue before
they got delivered...
|
pfv
|
|
response 156 of 188:
|
Dec 12 19:04 UTC 2000 |
Grex has fallen off the net twice today..
|
davel
|
|
response 157 of 188:
|
Dec 13 14:25 UTC 2000 |
Thanks, Marcus!
|
swa
|
|
response 158 of 188:
|
Dec 14 07:11 UTC 2000 |
Has anyone else had problems with telnet being really *really* slow
lately? Or is this part of my own personal curse that seems to be
affecting the computers around me these days?
|
carson
|
|
response 159 of 188:
|
Dec 15 02:16 UTC 2000 |
(sadly, the I-Net connection seems to be down. weather-related?)
|
wh
|
|
response 160 of 188:
|
Dec 15 02:30 UTC 2000 |
Email is taking a long time to send tonight.
|
carson
|
|
response 161 of 188:
|
Dec 15 03:24 UTC 2000 |
(if it was off-site email, the two are related.) :^)
|
wh
|
|
response 162 of 188:
|
Dec 15 03:32 UTC 2000 |
When we send offsite email, is it not stored to send out if
our net connection is down? Why does that take any longer
than if it is up? I guess I don't understand the mechanism
and what changes in Grex when the outgoing connection is down.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 163 of 188:
|
Dec 15 03:34 UTC 2000 |
Maybe we don't understand what you mean by "Email is taking a long time
to send." Can you explain or expand?
|
wh
|
|
response 164 of 188:
|
Dec 15 03:44 UTC 2000 |
I meant it takes a long time for the message at the bottom
of the Pine screen to say "message sent".
|
carson
|
|
response 165 of 188:
|
Dec 15 03:56 UTC 2000 |
(my understanding is that pine tries to send immediately. after some
period of time, if the send is not successful, the mail is queued for an
attempt at a later time. however, I defer to staff on this one.) ;)
|
dunne
|
|
response 166 of 188:
|
Dec 15 09:01 UTC 2000 |
#158: My experience has been that grex is experiencing short,
intermittent periods when the Net connection seems to go down --
or at least, pinging it from my box times out. This was the case
yesterday, don't know yet if it is still going on today.
|
davel
|
|
response 167 of 188:
|
Dec 15 11:36 UTC 2000 |
(Re #165: I don't think so, Carson. pine or any other MUA (mail client)
should hand mail off to Grex's sendmail to deal with. That generates the
MUA's "sent" message, if there is one. The message is then in the queue.
If sendmail can't deliver it, it's held.
OTOH, if the net connection is down, there could be a lot of sendmail
processes all trying to move queued mail out. This might slow down the
creation of new sendmail processes to accept mail from a user client program.
If that's so, our net problems could be related to the reported symptom.)
|
gull
|
|
response 168 of 188:
|
Dec 15 15:26 UTC 2000 |
PINE has an option for "background sends" or something similar that's
normally disabled, so I think normally it waits for the mail to be actually
sent before saying "message sent." Turning on background sending would
probably speed things up when the 'net connection is down.
|
mdw
|
|
response 169 of 188:
|
Dec 15 21:09 UTC 2000 |
The network connection has definitely been intermittently flakey. Last
I heard, we knew it was an Ameritech problem; I don't know what progress
there has been since.
We've certainly had other problems which I guess could be categorized as
"stupid vandals". Today I discovered what appeared to be a mail loop
maliciously created by someon in attempt to either disable one or more
mail systems, or mail flood someone. I'm not sure which; but the result
on grex was 120 copies of sendmail were all busy reading huge messages.
This didn't affect the load average much, but meant there was annoying
net lag. I managed to eventually sort things out such that sendmail was
sending "mailbox is full" messages for the grex account involved with
this mess, about 1 every 3 seconds for a while. It seems to have
stopped now, which means either I broke the mail loop, or somebody else
noticed the problem and is busy cleaning up their end.
|
senna
|
|
response 170 of 188:
|
Dec 16 05:18 UTC 2000 |
I couldn't get on for a while this evening. Same thing?
|
rksjr
|
|
response 171 of 188:
|
Dec 17 23:25 UTC 2000 |
On Thursday (Dec. 14) I was downloading prospective e-mail
onto the "mail" composition screen (not one of the editor
screens) when the screen froze, with the downloading
unfinished; I waited a few minutes and as the screen was
still frozen I disconnected, probably by mouse clicking a
disconnection option.
Assuming that my unfinished e-mail had not been sent, I
was surprised shortly thereafter to receive responses to the
message from people who now think of me as one who sends
e-mails which end abruptly and which do not complete a
coherent message.
Aside from recommending Pine or Elm, is there any way I
can continue to use "mail" without being concerned about the
possibility of sending unfinished e-mail?
|
carson
|
|
response 172 of 188:
|
Dec 18 00:26 UTC 2000 |
(Hotmail? AOL?) ;)
(seriously, what do you mean by "downloading... onto the 'mail'
composition screen"? were you trying to paste a large file?)
|
mcnally
|
|
response 173 of 188:
|
Dec 18 05:56 UTC 2000 |
If he was using "mail" (aka UCB mail), mail composition occurs in
line mode unless you call up whatever visual editor you've set in
$EDITOR or $VISUAL..
It sounds like his TCP connection went sour while he was composing
and mail read that as being an EOF-like condition on its input stream.
Presumably what should have happened was that it should have received
a SIGHUP from the system and saved the letter he was composing in
~/dead.letter
|
tpryan
|
|
response 174 of 188:
|
Dec 18 12:13 UTC 2000 |
Does new dead.letter replace old dead.letter; append to it or
not det saved because old dead.letter already exists?
|