You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-181   
 
Author Message
25 new of 181 responses total.
keesan
response 150 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 19 23:29 UTC 1998

Changing the wait time with end is only temporary, it seems.
Again I could not get through at 9600, should I wait more than 60 sec?
2400 bps worked in exactly 12 sec.  Is there a bad line from here to there?
They fixed a break in it in August when it went dead.
scg
response 151 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 20 01:52 UTC 1998

You might also try a different modem.
mcnally
response 152 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 20 07:24 UTC 1998

  I agree..  Sounds like your modem doesn't negotiate well with at least
  one of the early trunk modems.  Given that you presumably have access to
  a pool of cheap used modems at Kiwanis, why not try another for a while?
keesan
response 153 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 20 22:33 UTC 1998

But why did my modem connect okay to Arbornet at 9600 bps in 19 seconds, but
not in 60 sec to Grex 3000 or 5041, and just fine at 2400?  And why did it
work until three days ago?  I will try another modem and report back.
(Or maybe grex should replace the problem modem?  What is the high-pitched
squeal that I got after 25 seconds on grex at 9600?
mdw
response 154 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 21 02:42 UTC 1998

That's the pig.
scg
response 155 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 21 04:14 UTC 1998

There are standards for how modems are supposed to communicate at various
speeds.  If all manufacturers stuck exactly to the standards, all modems would
talk to eachother.  In practice, that's not the case.  Many, perhaps most,
modems deviate from the standards in one way or another, but have generally
been tested carefully to make sure that they will still talk to modems that
do adhere to the standards.  However, when you get two modems that deviate
from the standards in opposite directions, you start having trouble.
valerie
response 156 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 22 01:39 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

other
response 157 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 22 13:22 UTC 1998

8:22am  up 3 days, 18:31,  3 users,  load average: 0.22, 0.14, 0.00
keesan
response 158 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 23 01:02 UTC 1998

Jim suggested a dirty contact, unplugging and replugging, but just in case
we switched modems and connected with a Compudyne in 22 sec.  If it had been
modem incompatibility I would not have been using grex for the past six months
with the other modem.
scg
response 159 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 23 01:59 UTC 1998

That's not quite true.  Grex has two different kinds of modems in its hunt
group.  That is, they're the same brand and model and everything, but they
made some changes at some point so the newer ones are different from the older
ones.  It's possible that when you started dialing into the beginning of the
hunt group instead of somewhere near the end, you started using a different
version of the modem on Grex's end than you had been using before.
keesan
response 160 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 19:23 UTC 1998

I was dialing to both 5159 and 3000 and connecting fine.  My new modem does
not put garbage on the screen in random places like the old one seems to have
been responsible for doing (a screenful when I logged off).
senna
response 161 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 09:27 UTC 1998

Okay, I'm going to be picky and bring up my text droppage problem again.  The
difficulty appears to originate from my computer at some point, but it's still
annoying.  When I recieve text, random parts (in substantial portions) get
left out.  This includes all characters, including enters or line breaks, so
large amounts of text like bbs or party are very difficult to read.  If
possible, this is even worse when I dial into mnet.  It only occurs when I
dial in, which is when I'm using hyperterminal.  Any ideas?
remmers
response 162 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 12:13 UTC 1998

Sounds like a flow control problem. Check your modem and hyperterminal
settings.
mcnally
response 163 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 06:11 UTC 1998

  It does sound like a flow-control problem.  But rather than check your
  Hyperterm settings I recommend that you junk it entirely.  Even if it
  has nothing to do with your current problem it's practically a no-lose
  move..
rtg
response 164 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 29 06:08 UTC 1998

What do you suggest as a freely-available replacement communications
program for Win95/8?
BTW - has anyone noticed that hyperterm is distributed on the WIN98 CD,
but the installation program doesn't download it?  I've been trying to get
it, or something better, loaded for a friend this week.
danr
response 165 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 29 18:37 UTC 1998

The hyperterm private edition you can download from www.hilgraeve.com is
decent.  It's what I use, but I'm not a heavy telnet user.
rywfol
response 166 of 181: Mark Unseen   Nov 30 20:01 UTC 1998

I've encountered a minor problem using Backtalk.
I posted a response in the Humor item which hadn't formatted correctly, 
so I erased it and rewrote the response.
When I submitted that response (and subsequently a third) they came up 
as erased immediately, though I did not erase them.
What causes this?
janc
response 167 of 181: Mark Unseen   Dec 2 03:48 UTC 1998

That's weird.  I don't know what could cause that.  I'll put it on my
list of things to investigate.
jeff
response 168 of 181: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 00:22 UTC 1998

 mutt doesn't work :(

 this is the error message I get:
/var/spool/mail/j/e/jeff: No such file or directory (errno = 2)
/var/spool/mail/j/e/jeff: No such file or directory (errno = 2)

mdw
response 169 of 181: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 04:36 UTC 1998

Try sending yourself mail first.
tpryan
response 170 of 181: Mark Unseen   Dec 6 23:57 UTC 1998

        mutt and jeff?
hhsrat
response 171 of 181: Mark Unseen   Dec 7 02:25 UTC 1998

Just wondering.  Is there any way to turn the !clickify command into a page on
the Grex Web Site?  I think that maybe it should be linked from the backtalk
welcome page or something. 
valerie
response 172 of 181: Mark Unseen   Dec 7 20:46 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

dpc
response 173 of 181: Mark Unseen   Dec 9 15:34 UTC 1998

I just got a piece of e-mail whose last few lines were truncated when
I read the message using "!mail".  However, the message was *intact*
in my mbox.  The mail was 5 1/2 single-spaced pages.  Is this too long?
I've sent "staff" the details.
davel
response 174 of 181: Mark Unseen   Dec 10 03:35 UTC 1998

Did it perhaps have a line beginning "From " at about the point it
was truncated?  To make a random guess.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-181   
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss