You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-384    
 
Author Message
25 new of 384 responses total.
sholmes
response 150 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 04:02 UTC 2004

148 slipped in.
keesan
response 151 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 04:41 UTC 2004

I put a # in front of the line in .forward to disable it - is that right?
I since today I got two more spame to @grex.org I just sent myself one more
test mail to keesan@grex.org.

The friend who got back bounced mail said it was bounced on Jan 3 with a 'host
name lookup failure for cyberspace.org'.  When was our domain name problem
fixed?  Perhaps the spammers have some way to get through that real people
don't know about?  

I have not had any bounced mail when I mailed to my grex account from another
account in the last two days.
bhoward
response 152 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 05:01 UTC 2004

I *think* sendmail respects # as a comment character in .forward, but
I have encountered other mailers in the past that didn't.  I think it
is better to move the .forward to a different file name if you aren't
using it right now.

I've observed no domain problems for the last few days now, not even in
asia (for some reason, dns on servers I frequent in Japan and Hong
Kong took a bit longer than the US based ones I use to notice the dns
corrections).
keesan
response 153 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 14:42 UTC 2004

After I put # in front of the line in .forward, and also after I renamed it
.forward.bak, I got both my test mails and also four of the spams that would
normally have gone into the bulk or other spam folders.  Anyone want to take
a look at my .forward.bak (or .forward) file to see what stupid thing I might
have done to it last time I added a few filters?  Thanks all.

But four spams slipped by whatever filter was causing the problem.  I have
saved two of them in case they are helpful.

Do I need to make my .forward file readable somehow (chmod +x .forward)?
keesan
response 154 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 15:35 UTC 2004

I got my grex mail fixed just in time.  Today I got a bounced mail at my
temporary address which I sent to someone using a service that uses spamcop's
blackhole list.  I would greatly appreciate someone helping me to fix my spam
filter here so my box does not fill up with trash.
aruba
response 155 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 16:38 UTC 2004

Sindi - that error message your friend got sounds like it was during the
period when a lot of people were reporting domain lookup problems on both
grex.org and cyberspace.org.  I still don't know what caused that - it was
only cyberspace.org that changed registrars.
gelinas
response 156 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 10 02:56 UTC 2004

named on grex was running but not, apparently, working.  I restarted just
before the machine went down for the mail problem, IIRC.  Apparently, 
we dropped out of puck.nether.net's config files, while named wasn't
responding.
naftee
response 157 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 10 14:14 UTC 2004

IRC
keesan
response 158 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 10 16:32 UTC 2004

I am getting mail okay now and have started a new .procmailrc file and am
sending myself a test mail every time I add a filter but I would still
appreciate people telling me what I did wrong with .procmailrc.old so I won't
do it again.  How do I filter (with one filter):  viagra, v-i-a-g-r-a,
v!iagra, v1agra  without filtering all my mail to a bulk folder?
kip
response 159 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 10 16:54 UTC 2004

I'm not certain, but I believe it was just a manner of poor luck and timing
that the DNS issues occured about the same time and were the real cause of
your mail issues.  
keesan
response 160 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 10 17:12 UTC 2004

The DNS problems were in addition to my mail filter problems.  I started
getting mail yesterday a minute after I removed my filter.
kip
response 161 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 10 18:24 UTC 2004

Hmmm, okay then.  May I suggest you add something like this to your filter
file near the top:

LOGFILE=/a/k/e/keesan/mail/procmail.log

Or whereever you would like to point that file.

That will give you a file that records the From:, date, Subject: and eventual
file or destination for every email procmail handles.  Very useful for 
tracking these types of issues down.
keesan
response 162 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 10 18:53 UTC 2004

Thanks, but I think I would fill up my disk quota quickly if I logged all my
spams.  Jeremy found my problem - I added five filters without a * before
^Subject.  I restored my old .procmailrc and will test that i can send myself
mail every time I change it.  
kip
response 163 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 10 21:54 UTC 2004

That's true, procmail averages about 150 characters per log entry for me 
at my home domain and last month I had a little over 16,000 emails, so the 
whole month's procmail log was just under 2.5 million bytes.  That would 
chew up the quota here pretty fast. 
mcnally
response 164 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 10 22:47 UTC 2004

 *if* you left it on..
keesan
response 165 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 11 01:00 UTC 2004

I have a very long filter set up and all four of the spams that arrived in
the last two hours were of the XOCPT she swims bananas type with five lines
of nonsense words before the HTML.  I have not found any way to filter them
- any ideas?
i
response 166 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 11 12:42 UTC 2004

Dialing in to 761-3000 several times in the past few days, i've gotten
NO CARRIER disconnects as soon as the modems are done with their training
tones.  Dialing in to 761-3451 gets me in normally when this happens.
ryan
response 167 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 19:18 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 168 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 23:09 UTC 2004

Someone hogged up a lot of space.  I'm looking into it, but I don't have a
lot of time right now.
willcome
response 169 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 23:30 UTC 2004

Hey, punk, that doesn't help Grex.
naftee
response 170 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 07:07 UTC 2004

tail: /var/log/messages: Permission denied

Fix this please.
scott
response 171 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 13:43 UTC 2004

That's intentional.
kip
response 172 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 14:48 UTC 2004

I'll bite.  What is in /var/log/messages that you want to see?
willcome
response 173 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 15:23 UTC 2004

ACN"T YOU SEE I"M COLOUREd??
naftee
response 174 of 384: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 18:12 UTC 2004

re 172 Someone killed my login processes last night while I was in party. 
I want to know who did it.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-384    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss