You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-15   15-39   40-64   65-78       
 
Author Message
25 new of 78 responses total.
cmcgee
response 15 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 7 12:29 UTC 1999

As a regular dialer-in, I personally don't think we need more phone lines.
dpc
response 16 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 7 15:25 UTC 1999

Me, neither.
mcnally
response 17 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 7 16:43 UTC 1999

  I can't recall the last time I got a busy signal on the local dial-ins..
janc
response 18 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 20:05 UTC 1999

I think the only way adding dialins would be interesting would be if
they were added in some other city.
toking
response 19 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 20:11 UTC 1999

resp:18 that would most deffinately be cool
ryan
response 20 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 20:24 UTC 1999

This response has been erased.

lilmo
response 21 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 21:08 UTC 1999

Add one in Blacksburg, and I'll call in every day.  Hmm... maybe that's not
such a good idea; I do need to get SOME sleep.  At least the library closes
every night, and I *have* to leave.
richard
response 22 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 21:20 UTC 1999

could add a dialin in columbus for grexohio...or perhaps in upstate
michigan somewhere
aruba
response 23 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 04:05 UTC 1999

I wonder how far afield we could add lines and still have them be on our
Centrex system?
hhsrat
response 24 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 04:33 UTC 1999

Probably not too far, but I don't know anything about centrex or phones.
krj
response 25 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 04:37 UTC 1999

I think it's called OPX Centrex, Off-Premises Extension.  MSU, my employer, 
has some scattered around.  The problem is that there is a per-mile charge
every month.
mdw
response 26 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 05:40 UTC 1999

If we wanted to do dialups elsewhere, there are 2 ways that make the
mose sense to consider: (1) locate some sort of terminal server with the
modems, buy an extra phoneline or ISDN line, and connect it up to the
internet, (2) make a deal with some ISP (such as merit) to share the use
of their dial-ups.  Both of these cost money.  It's not clear to me that
the economics of operating dialups is all that compelling.
jep
response 27 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 13:34 UTC 1999

I don't see why there's any need for Grex to add dial-ups anywhere else.  
How many people could be expected to use them?  The people we'd be 
trying to reach would be people with computers and modems, who want to 
use Grex, but aren't interested in using the Internet (or who can't for 
some reason -- incapable computers, insufficient available money to have 
an ISP account, etc.)  

I don't believe there's any place in the state where no ISP is 
available, and darned few where there aren't multiple ISPs, so we 
wouldn't be offering anything to people that they couldn't get another 
way.

What's the point of this?
janc
response 28 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 16:26 UTC 1999

I'm not at all sure it would be a good idea - but like I said, it would
be interesting to consider.

It would offer something to people that they couldn't get other ways -
free internet access.

Grex's support is strongest here in Ann Arbor.  Maybe we'd get more
support in other places if we had dial-ins in other places.

Probably we'd need someone with a full-time internet connection at some
remote place who was eager enough to do this to be willing to set up a
terminal server, and one or more modems and phone lines at their
location, and maintain them.

Not at all sure that it is useful or feasible, but it is certainly more
interesting that adding more Ann Arbor lines.
janc
response 29 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 16:36 UTC 1999

Actually, it would be an interesting idea for "the future of Grex".

Establish presences in other cities, maybe focusing at first on places
like Madison, Ithaca, and Austin.  Not the major metropolises where
there are already so many services available, and not the small towns
where it would be hard to find a large enough core of people who'd be
interested in doing something like this, but the medium-sized college
communities.

It'd be challenging to try to make this work.  We'd need to recruit
people in those places to seed things, and we'd need to raise seed money
to start setting things up.  We'd need to find ways to do more of our
governance on-line so that we could involve people at remote sites. 
You'd need to do better publicity than we ever have before to attract
users in those new cities. But it's been a while since Grex faced any
challenges.  It could make Grex more fun to try something new.

It's kind of sad that the whole Grex/Arbornet concept never made it out
of Ann Arbor, and isn't very well known to the rest of the Internet. 
This could be a way to push the concept of open access systems to a new
level.
jazz
response 30 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 16:49 UTC 1999

        In the case of the WELL, it did.  

        The WELL changed considerably more with the times, however.
aruba
response 31 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 17:24 UTC 1999

The WELL was always a for-pay system, though, which attracts a different set
of people than Grex/Arbornet has.

While still considering the notion of setting up phone lines in other cities, 
maybe it would make sense to set up whole other conferencing systems in other
cities.  Perhaps Grex could loan money to make that possible.  In the end it
might be good for us (not to mention good for the world in general) for Grex
to have more peers.
albaugh
response 32 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 17:27 UTC 1999

Just for the sake of being idiotic, what would the cost of having an 800
number be?
mcnally
response 33 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 18:27 UTC 1999

  Depenmds on how many people call it..
drewmike
response 34 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 18:29 UTC 1999

And how long they call. If someone calls Grex now, and doesn't terminate the
call properly, it's a hassle for Grex. If it were a toll-free number, it would
be an expense as well as a hassle.
albaugh
response 35 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 18:41 UTC 1999

Well, "what if" there were one & only one grex 800 number for outstate modem-
bound people to call.  So only one person at a time could use it, and would
be on as long as their session lasted.  What would the cost be?  Could grex
set a limit on session length for the 800 number?  Etc...
scg
response 36 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 18:56 UTC 1999

I'm under the impression that the going rate for 800 numbers is something like
8 cents a minute at this point.  It can get somewhat cheaper with really high
volume.
scott
response 37 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 19:47 UTC 1999

Let's see, $0.08 x 60 min/hour x 24 hour/day = $115.20 a day, assuming full
use (which is pretty likely).

I think this topic came up because somebody suggested Grex needed more dialins
without actually checking to see if that was true.
jep
response 38 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 21:01 UTC 1999

If anyone had asked Grex for help in setting up a conferencing system 
like this one, I'd be in favor of helping them.  I'd think aruba's 
suggestion of loans was at least worth considering.  It's a *lot* of 
work to set up a system like this, and beyond that it's even more work 
to run it, fund it, help all the users, etc.  If a loan and some advice 
and moral support would help get the job done, I'd want to see Grex do 
what it could.

However, there have been no requests, or even any speculations such as 
"Sure would like to do something like Grex in Anchorage".  On the 
Internet, it doesn't matter where you are.  We can serve Anchorage, have 
an Anchorage conference, and have the users come in to here, using the 
resources we already have, without bothering with another system, 
another staff, another Board, another office, more phone lines and 
Internet connections and all that.  I don't see how it benefits Grex, or 
users in Anchorage, or anyone at all, to have us remotely put up a 
system in Anchorage and try to make sure someone there administers it 
and funds it and runs it.  It's easier, cheaper, more reliable (we've 
been doing it for most of a decade, and almost 2 decades if you count 
M-Net), and generally better all around to just keep it all here.

I'm not opposed to other systems.  I'm just not wildly enthusiastic 
about Grex spending much time/effort/money in getting other systems set 
up, until and unless people in other places take the initiative to set 
them up.  *Then* we can help them.-
danr
response 39 of 78: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 21:30 UTC 1999

It might be that we missed our window of opportunity to set up POPs in other
locales. 
 0-15   15-39   40-64   65-78       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss