|
Grex > Oldcoop > #390: Possible rigging of the last Board election | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 11 new of 25 responses total. |
scholar
|
|
response 15 of 25:
| 
Jan 25 02:17 UTC 2007 |
Re. 10: Also, Todd has said publicalyl on several occasions that he dropped
out because of all the extra people who hadn't used Grex in months who decided
to run for the board all of a sudden.
Even if that wasn't the reason he dropped out, you could hardly use that as
proof that the erroneous declaration didn't completely fuck up the election.
I don't think you're an intelligent man, Gel, and I haven't since you started
having a fit over posting parts of /etc/passwd files, claiming they were a
breach of security, which is short witted bunk.
E.
|
tod
|
|
response 16 of 25:
|
Jan 25 06:18 UTC 2007 |
re #10
I decided not to run when I saw mdw and janc running for no reason other than
to dilute cross and scholar's possibility of getting on the board. I felt
dropping out would increase the chances of actual coop cf participants getting
on board instead of the same old stale names that had come out of hiding for
whatever reason.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 17 of 25:
|
Jan 25 08:01 UTC 2007 |
I was happy to see that Marcus' candidacy was not successful,
as I, too, thought it was not motivated by a sincere interest
in becoming re-engaged with Grex but by an intention to block
other people from joining the board.
|
jadecat
|
|
response 18 of 25:
|
Jan 25 15:27 UTC 2007 |
resp:14 Why?
|
remmers
|
|
response 19 of 25:
|
Jan 25 17:22 UTC 2007 |
Hm. It appears that I mistakenly listed scholar as having accepted the
nomination in response 31 of the nominations item (resp:236,31), posted
on November 10. It was an unintentional mistake, but definitely my
fault, and I apologize.
Since the error was made fully 20 days before the election started, and
acceptances are required to be made publicly in the item, I'm surprised
that nobody caught it. But I guess those things happen.
By the way, I haven't talked to Marcus and can't comment on his reasons
for running, but having served with Jan on the board for the past year,
I think resp:16 is full of it as far as its characterization of janc's
motives are concerned.
|
remmers
|
|
response 20 of 25:
|
Jan 25 17:24 UTC 2007 |
(In #19, the link to the erroneous response should be resp:370,31 .)
|
slynne
|
|
response 21 of 25:
|
Jan 25 17:31 UTC 2007 |
I have to agree with remmers regarding janc's motives. I mean, he has
been on the board for a while now and was running for re-election. He
has been a very valuable member of the board too, fwiw.
|
aruba
|
|
response 22 of 25:
|
Jan 25 19:11 UTC 2007 |
Absolutely.
|
tod
|
|
response 23 of 25:
|
Jan 25 21:59 UTC 2007 |
I have to disagree with you both (slynne and remmers.) I don't see janc
rolling up his sleeves and engaging us here in this conference. That alone
was how I drew my conclusion in #16. You can say I'm full of it because he's
been there on the board but to me if you're not willing to participate
regularly in coop cf then what's the point of running? Who does that
represent other than one's self?
|
ric
|
|
response 24 of 25:
|
Feb 11 02:36 UTC 2007 |
Jan is on the board?
|
tod
|
|
response 25 of 25:
|
Feb 11 03:31 UTC 2007 |
re #24
Grex Board of Directors Meeting: January 23, 2007
Attending: Mark Conger*, Dan Cross*, Lynne Fremont*, Joe Gelinas,
Bruce Howard*, Larry Kestenbaum*, Jan Wolter* * = board member
|