|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 222 responses total. |
remmers
|
|
response 141 of 222:
|
Nov 23 13:52 UTC 2000 |
Welcome back!
(Cold enough for you?)
|
carson
|
|
response 142 of 222:
|
Nov 24 02:57 UTC 2000 |
(uh, scratch #138. I ended up eating half the jar during my trip.)
<belch>
|
carson
|
|
response 143 of 222:
|
Nov 24 11:23 UTC 2000 |
(weren't kornnut and munkey the first couple to marry after meeting
on Grex, or did I miss something?)
|
remmers
|
|
response 144 of 222:
|
Nov 24 14:21 UTC 2000 |
(Yes, I believe they were.)
|
tpryan
|
|
response 145 of 222:
|
Nov 24 15:44 UTC 2000 |
Time to revise the Grex history book.
|
other
|
|
response 146 of 222:
|
Nov 28 00:46 UTC 2000 |
I have typed up and entered an html version of the appellate court ruling in
Cyberspace v. Engler. I did my best to reproduce the look and form of the
original documents I was faxed.
See http://www.cyberspace.org/lawsuit/ruling.html
The ruling is linked from the main lawsuit page.
Read it. It is short, but very interesting in what it says *between* the
lines.
|
other
|
|
response 147 of 222:
|
Nov 30 02:38 UTC 2000 |
Help! I am looking for an apartment/flat in Ann Arbor. I'm looking for
a 1-2 bedroom, with laundry and parking. I would far prefer it to be in
an old (or new) house than in an apartment community/complex.
If you know of anyone with something like this available, please let me
know.
I am generally a quiet sort, responsible and with a steady income.
Thanks!
(Did I mention I'm kind of in a hurry? Oh. I am.)
|
ric
|
|
response 148 of 222:
|
Nov 30 12:22 UTC 2000 |
I generally liked living at Park Place Apartments on the corner of Pauline
and Stadium, if you're looking for something relatively inexpensive.
If you've got money to spend, check out Arbor Landings on Dexter-Ann Arbor
Road right before crossing over M14.. those were nice too.
|
ashke
|
|
response 149 of 222:
|
Nov 30 13:50 UTC 2000 |
Depending on the money, there are several. When I was looking, I did a few
things:
http://www.aplacetorent.com
http://www.apartments.com
http://www.apartmentguide.com
Also, the easiest way, is if you go to Apartment Search. They ended up
finding me my place. They're all over, there are several places in Detriot
area, one in Canton, and one in Ann Arbor. They can tell you the name and
phone number at (I think this is right) http://www.apartmentsearch.com
You have to go in, but it's worth it. And they do all the running around,
call the place, find out if they have one NOW or not.
|
scott
|
|
response 150 of 222:
|
Nov 30 14:28 UTC 2000 |
I hated Park Place, especially the managment.
|
ashke
|
|
response 151 of 222:
|
Nov 30 14:45 UTC 2000 |
I had friends who lived there, and from what I remember, they didn't like the
management, the property is kinda rundown, and they had bats in their
apartment from the attic (they were in a top floor apartment) and it took
almost 2 weeks before they got rid of them. I tend to avoid that place.
|
other
|
|
response 152 of 222:
|
Nov 30 18:40 UTC 2000 |
I used to live at Park Place. Pass.
Thanks for the urls, I'll check 'em out.
|
ashke
|
|
response 153 of 222:
|
Nov 30 19:12 UTC 2000 |
Welcome :)
|
mcnally
|
|
response 154 of 222:
|
Nov 30 20:43 UTC 2000 |
I found that most of the apartments listed in the apartment search services
were for complexes.
Based on my interpretation of what you've said, I'd say look in the AA News
classifieds, in the "for rent" section, but look under "duplexes" as well as
apartments. A couple of times (I lived in many different places during my
years in Ann Arbor) I found much better than run-of-the-mill apartments that
were overlooked because they were listed in the "duplexes" section. I used
to assume most of the stuff in the duplex category was your traditional
side-by-side half-of-a-house arrangement, but found that there are all sorts
of other arrangements that get advertised in there and that the category
isn't as relentlessly scoured as the apartments for rent category, so if
you find a place there's a much better chance it's available and the
landlord is often more flexible.
I could never decide whether the decision to advertise as a duplex was a
mistake from the landlords' perspective or whether they did it deliberately
to attract a different sort of clientele than went after the "apartments"
market, but anyway, I found the duplex offerings to be more to my taste.
|
ric
|
|
response 155 of 222:
|
Nov 30 22:09 UTC 2000 |
(Now that I've gone back and read beyond the first sentence of his response,
I'm guessing that Mike is probably right.. :)
|
other
|
|
response 156 of 222:
|
Nov 30 23:19 UTC 2000 |
Seems so. Definitely in the comment about the services. Thanks for the
duplex hint.
|
eprom
|
|
response 157 of 222:
|
Dec 3 09:52 UTC 2000 |
I ordered a "jambon eru" thing at the Mall in Marseilles, come to find out
its basically a ham sandwich...it was yummy! :)
|
albaugh
|
|
response 158 of 222:
|
Dec 5 16:08 UTC 2000 |
An amusement for those of you with graphical web browsers:
http://www.happyhub.com/network/reflex
|
gelinas
|
|
response 159 of 222:
|
Dec 5 18:39 UTC 2000 |
(Actually it appears to be for those who are willing to give any random hacker
access to their machine. That is, it requires javascript.)
|
birdy
|
|
response 160 of 222:
|
Dec 5 21:06 UTC 2000 |
IWLTA that the group flem and I sing with will be performing near the
Engineering Arch on Saturday, December 9th from 3:00 p.m. 'til whenever. We
will be singing carols (in Latin) and other medieval/renaissance era songs.
This is through the SCA, which is an international group dedicated to
reproducing/reenacting the Medieval and Renaissance periods.
And yes, we will be in period clothing. =)
|
jor
|
|
response 161 of 222:
|
Dec 5 21:13 UTC 2000 |
*outside*?
better be period goosedown
|
flem
|
|
response 162 of 222:
|
Dec 5 22:12 UTC 2000 |
Oh, right, we're wearing period. I better get crackin'. :)
|
ric
|
|
response 163 of 222:
|
Dec 6 02:46 UTC 2000 |
I don't know of any way that "hackers" can obtain "access" to your machine
via javascript.
I know that javascript can occassionally be used to do some annoying things,
but javascript has absolutely no way to access your machine.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 164 of 222:
|
Dec 6 02:48 UTC 2000 |
It runs on your machine doesn't it? The interpreter does whatever its
implementer allows. I don't trust the implementers, so I don't run
javascript.
I know they claim its safer than java, but that's never been much comfort
to me.
|
gull
|
|
response 165 of 222:
|
Dec 6 04:52 UTC 2000 |
Well, if you don't trust the implementers you better not use HTML, either.
There was that bug in IE4 that allowed a certain type of malformed tag to be
used to replace arbitrary files on your system.
|