keesan
|
|
response 15 of 18:
|
Jul 21 18:38 UTC 2003 |
We were walking in Saginaw forest on a muddy day. Jim had on white pants.
We crossed paths with a woman with two large unleashed dogs. One of them,
trying to be friendly, jumped all over Jim. I don't recall any apology. At
the park entry is a sign saying all pets must be leashed. There are lots of
unleashed dogs on the park trails around here.
|
slynne
|
|
response 17 of 18:
|
Jul 21 18:55 UTC 2003 |
Of course, the solution is to have special dog parks where dogs are
allowed off leash which leaves the other parks available for kids and
stuff.
regarding resp:13 Yes, some dog owners do that. Some parents allow
their children all sorts of liberties that infringe on those of other
people. Of course, if I am walking with my dogs on a leash (a regular
one, not the 20ft retractable one) and someone gets close enough to me
that my dogs can sniff their crotch, I figure they have it coming for
invading my personal space like that.
I also believe that people should be held responsible for things that
their dogs do. I mean if a dog bites someone, the owner should be held
criminally responsible if they were in any way negligent (and having a
dog off leash would count as negligent, imho). This is the only reason
I think leash laws are ok. So that if a dog bites someone while off
leash, the owner is automatically negligent. I dont think it is a good
use of public resources to actually enforce leash laws. Of course, I
dont think it is a good use of public resources to enforce drug laws
either.
Anyone who would put out poison like that is a sick person. I mean, it
is one thing to lobby the city to enforce the laws but it is totally
another thing to take the law into one's own hands.
|