|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 269 responses total. |
jaklumen
|
|
response 133 of 269:
| 
May 7 04:45 UTC 2003 |
Look back a few responses, I am quite pumped.
|
gull
|
|
response 134 of 269:
|
May 7 14:11 UTC 2003 |
Re #120: I liked _Treasure Planet_ too, when I rented it last weekend.
I think the critics hated it because it wasn't one of those massive,
epic films everyone expects Disney to make. The thing is, I'm usually
pretty indifferent towards their massive, epic films because they seem
so overblown. It could probably have done with fewer zany sidekick
characters, though.
Re #126: _League of Extraordinary Gentlemen_ is one I'm looking forward
to. I also want to see _Matrix: Reloaded_, though. On the other hand,
I'm not too interested in _Pirates of the Caribbean_. I'm not that into
traditional horror films. I also thought it was really poor judgement
to show a very intense, nightmarish trailer for it before the movie
_Holes_, which is aimed at children.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 135 of 269:
|
May 7 19:40 UTC 2003 |
I fear "League of Extraordinary Gentlemen" is the big-budget comic-booky
action film most likely to suck this summer. The trailers are not at all
promising -- they're so murky you can't particularly see or hear what's
going on and they do very little to convince me that I want to see the movie.
I'd like for it to be good, but I'm not going to be surprised if it's not..
|
gull
|
|
response 136 of 269:
|
May 7 20:41 UTC 2003 |
Oh yeah, I also want to see the remake of _The Italian Job_. The trailers
looked pretty good.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 137 of 269:
|
May 7 21:07 UTC 2003 |
I have read only a little of "League", the comic book. The characters in that
were/are slightly different than the characters in "League", the movie (I
don't THINK Tom Sawyer is in the comic)... but of course I have a soft spot
for Sean Connery in Victorian dress, so I'll be there. (Also a reason for
seeing "Pirates": Orlando Bloom and Johnny Depp in swashbuckling clothes.)
Fantasy ho! :-)
|
albaugh
|
|
response 138 of 269:
|
May 12 16:49 UTC 2003 |
Just saw an ad last night for the movie apparently going only by "HULK".
|
gregb
|
|
response 139 of 269:
|
May 12 18:07 UTC 2003 |
That would be for the movie based on Marvel's comic, "The Hulk."
|
edina
|
|
response 140 of 269:
|
May 12 18:14 UTC 2003 |
I saw a "Got Milk" ad with the new Hulk yesterday. I chuckled.
|
gull
|
|
response 141 of 269:
|
May 12 20:35 UTC 2003 |
I thought the arthritis medication ad with Frankenstein's Monster was
hilarious.
|
gregb
|
|
response 142 of 269:
|
May 13 16:36 UTC 2003 |
X2's been out over a week now and noone's posted a review. Come on,
let's hear about it! B-)
|
edina
|
|
response 143 of 269:
|
May 13 16:58 UTC 2003 |
I reviewed it the mornign after I saw it. Scroll back a bit.
|
gregb
|
|
response 144 of 269:
|
May 13 17:09 UTC 2003 |
Oops! That's right, you did.
|
mooncat
|
|
response 145 of 269:
|
May 13 20:31 UTC 2003 |
re #118- Umm, Banshee wasn't in this movie... that screaming child
would have been Siryn, Banshee's daughter.
re #129- The Beast's real name is Hank McCoy- his mutation was
increased strength and agility. The blue fuzz came from an experiment
he was working on gone wrong. So it would be 'possible' in movie terms
that he was speaking on TV before the accident that made him blue and
fuzzy.
For my part, I was really geeked to see the name Remy Lebeau (on the
computer when Mystique was looking for Magneto), I would love to see
Gambit in one of these movies.
The ages seem to be messed up all over the place. The only ones I can
see that they got right are the Professor, Magneto, Wolverine and
Jubilee. Kitty is a few years older than Jubilee is, I believe (she did
leave the X-Men to go join Nightcrawler's British based Excalibur team)
and JB is with Banshee's and the White Queen's new group of students.
Heh, not only is Mystique supposedly Nightcrawler's mother, but was
Rogue's foster mother AND had a fling with Sabretooth that produced a
completely normal human (who hates mutants and is trying to hunt down
Mommy and Daddy).
Oh, you all knew I was a gook, right? <grins>
Oh, opinion on the movie- I really enjoyed the second installment of
the X-Men movies, and think that they'll do all right if they can keep
Bryan Singer involved. The opening scene with Nightcrawler was just
wonderfully done- showing off his teleporting abilities nicely.
I was very pleased to see the cameos of Colossus, Kitty, Siryn, Gambit,
etc., letting the viewer know that while they are not a part of this
story per se, they are still around and haven't been forgotten.
I still say though that they did a bad thing in killing off Kelly in
the first movie- in my mind he's always been the real bad guy. Stryker
as a bad guy worked well in this movie, though I have no idea where
they got him, or his son. Oh well, it was nicely done.
The mutant abilities were shown well, first in Nightcrawler's trick,
and then the freeze of the people in the cafe thanks to the Prof. Very
nice.
I give it two thumbs up and encourage you all to let your inner 12 year
old out and enjoy the movie.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 146 of 269:
|
May 14 02:21 UTC 2003 |
I thought it was fun. What's with the kid with the blue forked tongue, by
the way? (I don't know the comic books.)
|
edina
|
|
response 147 of 269:
|
May 14 15:19 UTC 2003 |
From what I recall, he's just a mutant. Like Anne, I saw it twice the first
day - I am still astounded by how much I loved Alan Cumming in this movie (and
how grateful that Cyclops wasn't in it that much). Alan Cumming is turning
out to be one of those actors I just can't see making anything bad.
|
mooncat
|
|
response 148 of 269:
|
May 14 20:55 UTC 2003 |
(er... that was supposed to be geek back in 145... dunno where that
typo came from)
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 149 of 269:
|
May 14 22:25 UTC 2003 |
got the meaning, nevertheless =)
|
krj
|
|
response 150 of 269:
|
May 17 05:51 UTC 2003 |
I'm not much of a comics fan, so I can't review X-Men 2 for faithfulness
to the source material. On its own it works well, one of the best
comic book movies of the last 25 years or so -- I liked this better
than Spiderman or the first X-Men movie. The new movie does a
good job with the whole teenage angst theme of the series.
The action scenes aren't overdone as is normal in the genre.
There is almost no character set-up in this movie: it's assumed that
the audience all saw the last episode.
|
senna
|
|
response 151 of 269:
|
May 17 18:30 UTC 2003 |
I was actually impressed by X2, which threw in some reasonably interesting
plot elements, and while it's "fate of the free world" storyline is always
the kind of thing that's hard to top, it was presented well. Character
features were good, and the cameos of other characters (they could make ten
movies with all the characters in the X universe if they wanted to, but there
just isn't time) were nice without trying to showcase anybody too much.
In two movies they've rushed through perhaps 20 years of comic development,
with the teaser at the very end giving us a good indication of where else the
series might be going. I was pleased about it.
I saw Matrix Reloaded last night, and I was impressed. It's the sort of move
that you're better off finding things out about by going--some of the plot
elements (and the twists, oh man) are good things to be taken unaware. There
was an unecessary "Rave" scene early in the flick that went on longer than
was required by the plot, but other than that most of this movie went rather
well. The challenge in following up a movie as mindbending as the original
Matrix cannot be understated, but the Wachowski brothers have masterpiece
potential on their hands if the third movie lives up to this one.
It is visually stunning, it is thought-provoking (choice and control, choice
and control, you'll be tossing this around), and it crafts its obstacles so
well that you can honestly believew that a virtually all-powerful hero
actually can't just do everything. That's a real challenge when you've
already established that the hero is pretty much unbeatable, but this movie
did it well--the trick? Neo can't be in two places at one time.
The action sequences didn't have much in the way of new revolutionary
technology; they used teh old stuff and some subtle new stuff very well, and
the highway scene was one of the best action sequences I have ever seen in
any movie. Perhaps the best. They threw money at this movie in the right
places.
|
jazz
|
|
response 152 of 269:
|
May 18 01:57 UTC 2003 |
The Matrix is a tricky one to deal with. It's carried along so well
by visual style and action that it's hard not to like, but when it tries to
get deep, it stumbles across some serious gaps of credibility, and mires
itself in attempts at philosophy that amount to some higher power simply
saying "I thought you'd have figured that out by now."
|
edina
|
|
response 153 of 269:
|
May 19 15:32 UTC 2003 |
I liked it!!! I can't wait to see it again. I hated that I missed a key
point in it, but was happy that I picked up on something that noone else did.
And warning, to anyone seeing it, stay for ALL of hte credits, as they show
the preview for Revolutions.
|
furs
|
|
response 154 of 269:
|
May 20 14:01 UTC 2003 |
I liked it as well. However the first part of the movie was a little
slow, and I agree with the "rave" scene comment above. But other than
that it was a lot of fun. I LOVED the increased amount of hand-to-hand
combat. Awesome!
|
edina
|
|
response 155 of 269:
|
May 20 14:23 UTC 2003 |
I was initially disappointed that there wasn't more of the twins, but they're
listed in the credits for Revolutions (as well as Persephone), so I'll get
my fix there.
|
remmers
|
|
response 156 of 269:
|
May 20 16:46 UTC 2003 |
For some reason that I am unable to explain even to myself, I rented
"Children of the Corn" yesterday. Having now seen it, the mystery of
why I rented it has grown even deeper.
|
furs
|
|
response 157 of 269:
|
May 20 16:59 UTC 2003 |
I hated that movie because they let all the people live. (Different
from the book where they all died, I think.)
|
