You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-13   13-37   38-62   63-69       
 
Author Message
25 new of 69 responses total.
keesan
response 13 of 69: Mark Unseen   Sep 22 21:24 UTC 1998

Symmetry is often considered beautiful, in that lack of symmetry can indicate
poorer health or genetic problems.
i
response 14 of 69: Mark Unseen   Sep 22 22:40 UTC 1998

I've read of studies with computer-generated faces - average 20 so-so-looking
people's facial features in the computer, give the average near-perfect
symmetry, and the resulting face gets a definite beautiful/handsome rating.
beeswing
response 15 of 69: Mark Unseen   Sep 24 03:47 UTC 1998

Yep. For women the wide eyes, narrow cheekbones and defined chin are 
what's defined as ideal symmetry. Also, larger pupils are supposed to 
be more attractive. Supposedly, the pupils dilate slightly when you are 
aroused.
keesan
response 16 of 69: Mark Unseen   Sep 24 14:31 UTC 1998

Wide eyes and a high forehead have often been considered attractive on women,
along with a small pouting mouth and puffy cheeks, which is the same set of
features found in babies.  It makes the women look young and helpless.  There
have been times when women plucked off hair from their forehead (Mona Lisa),
or shaved their eyebrows, to look babyish.  Larger pupils, as achieved by
belladona (also used in eye exams for the same purpose), are found during
sexual arousal and make women look sexier.  Belladonna probably interfered
with vision, but since when was health more important than beauty.  When most
people worked outside, pale skins were attractive (take arsenic regularly to
make sure you have less red blood), when most people worked inside tans were
attractive.  Same for fat when most people were thin, and vice versa.
md
response 17 of 69: Mark Unseen   Sep 29 14:06 UTC 1998

Erica Jong's essay about women attacking women is on

http://www.ericajong.com/nyobserver980713.htm
bookworm
response 18 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 11:38 UTC 1999

I think my husband is one of those that escaped this damaging stereotype,
which btw gay men also suffer from.  However, he is (and admits it)
notoriously hard on himself.  Whenever I suggest that I am fat he is
immendiately militant in telling me that I am beautiful and sexy and that I
don't need to lose annny weight.  When his mother suggested to me that I ought
to lose some weight, he got so upset I had a real difficult time stopping him
from going to tell his mother off.  He, on the other hand, accepts her
criticism of his weight with a pain that is very visible.  Every time she and
her parents (much worse than her) mention his weight, I just want to strangle
them.  They have him considering diuretics and other harmful things.  It's
a wonder that he hasn't gotten some kind of eating disorder or something.
orinoco
response 19 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 21:23 UTC 1999

I'd never  realized how difficult a topic weight is to discus until
I re-read this item.  When I'm giving a physical description of a friend,
there are only two terms that I can think of that I feel uncomfortable using:
"black" and "overweight".  I had taken it for granted that the word "black"
could be awkward to use, since it has a huge range of meaning (appearance,
culture, parents, identity, used as a compliment, used as an insult, etc...)
and it's pretty heavily politicized.  But I hadn't expected "overweight" to
be just as awkward until, after reading this again, I noticed myself
hesitating to use it just as much.  
bookworm
response 20 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 21:33 UTC 1999

I've noticed that more and more myself.  I constantly refer to Jon as my
teddybear and "cuddly".  Chubby people are more fun because there's more to
hug.

Never thought I'd be a fat activist, but thinking about all the folks that
get down on other people because of weight problems just makes me burn!
i
response 21 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 20 12:09 UTC 1999

People are the most eager to do discretionary spending when they're
dissatisfied with themselves and trying to "fix it".  The "pushing
inflatomatic junk food at you everywhere" then tell you "thin is the
only way to be in" things is just another part of capitalism's Dark Side.
bookworm
response 22 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 20 17:09 UTC 1999

Sounds about right.
otter
response 23 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 01:48 UTC 1999

ref #19, 20: Assuming you have no problem describing someone as "thin", what
makes you hesitate to use the word "fat"? "Overweight" sounds, to me, like
the person has made a mistake or done something wrong - gone over.
Same with "weight problem". Some people are thin, some are fat, short, tall,
blonde, etc. We will all be a lot better off by working on changing our
thinking a bit, maybe starting with the words we use.
By the way, I'm fat. And gorgeous. 8^)
scott
response 24 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 02:24 UTC 1999

But you could be "fat" without really being "overweight".  Or could you?  How
is "overweight" defined?  I tend to look to the viewpoint about where the
amount of body fat becomes a health risk.  That is definitely overweight.

I dunno.  I sometimes wonder how people with, say, 40% (a guess) or greater
body fat can stand to haul all that stuff around.  But then I've learned (my
first bonafide "wisdom") that the worst/dumbest assumption you can make about
other people is that they share the same tastes as yourself.  So maybe my own
strange (possibly hereditary) compulsion to exercise often would be worse than
just being fat?
bookworm
response 25 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 18:35 UTC 1999

I've seen TONS of people who I would call underweight most definitely.

It's a pity skinny is in. 

I wonder if people would feel the same if someone they knew was in the 
hospital for anorexia nervosa.
orinoco
response 26 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 19:51 UTC 1999

Re#23: Exactly - it's not a rational response, any more than it's rational
to call someone "white" and then feel squeamish about calling someone else
"black".  That's why I think it's so interesting that I do respond that way.
beeswing
response 27 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 15:22 UTC 1999

A friend of mine was indeed hospitalized for anorexia. As in, feeding 
tube. It was a horrible thing to witness. 

I'm at the point where I just don't care anymore. No, I don't want to 
binge on Twinkies in the name of apathy. It's more that the whole body 
obsession thing no longer means much to me. I still want to take care of 
myself and eat well. Yes, I could stand to lose some, how many couldn't? 
I'm beautiful and that's all there is to it, thankyouverymuch. :)

If you are clinically obese (or overfat or whatever you wish to call it) 
and are happy with it, great. More power to you. But when I see someone 
profoundly overweight, it does make me wonder how it feels to carry all 
that around. It looks uncomfortable. 
beeswing
response 28 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 15:23 UTC 1999

... or as they say on AbFab, "I'm thin and gorgeous!!" :)
bookworm
response 29 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 18:33 UTC 1999

As I would reply, "Well, I'm relatively average and I'm still gorgeous!!"
keesan
response 30 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 20:29 UTC 1999

Julie has a lovely smile.
I would like to gain 5 pounds but am too busy to eat often.
Average for the USA is not average for the world, or what I would consider
normal or healthy.  That includes not only weight but diet (percentage of meat
and fat and sugar) and as a result also cholesterol and blood pressure.  A
cholesterol count of 200 is considered normal (average) here, but 125 is
healthier and is normal for China.  The human body has not evolved to carry
around large amounts of fat for long periods - it is hard on the joints as
well as the circulatory system.  And hot in the summer.
otter
response 31 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 00:01 UTC 1999

ref #24: "Overweight" seems to imply that there is a proper weight which one
has gone over. Remember the life insurance height/weight charts of years ago?

Society and medical science seem slow to realize that different bodies are
made to carry different amounts of weight, and that differing percentages of
that weight will be made up of adipose tissue.

Yes, too much fat will cause health problems, as will too little.
My personal guideline: if a person's girth is the first thing one notices,
that person is probably not at a healthy weight. (high or low)

I said earlier that I am fat. I mean that as opposed to being thin, which
I am not designed to be. Eating sensibly and exercising have made me
healthy. I truly believe that anyone who isn't willing to do that much for
themselves has *far* bigger problems than the size of their butt.
beeswing
response 32 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 22:40 UTC 1999

I have heard comments from thin people (as in Kate Moss types) that 
they're also tired of being labeled as freakish because of their 
thinness. Just as an overweight person would be tired of hearing "Your 
heart! Your joints! Your butt! Yeech!" a very thin person who is just 
genetically thin gets tired of "Ewww! You're too skinny! What's wrong 
with you?".

Take for instance Calista Flockart (Ally McBeal) and Celine Dion. I'd 
wager that both these women are just naturally small-boned and thin. 
Celine has had to go so far as to eat M & M's in public to squelch the 
rumors that she starves herself. 
katie
response 33 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 27 06:21 UTC 1999

When she was young, she was not so thin, and she was much more attractive.
Many women who get really thin develop horse-like features of the face. I
don't know what's up with that. Sarah Jessica Parker and Celine Dion are
examples.
md
response 34 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 27 12:36 UTC 1999

I've wondered about that, too.  I think what
happens is the horse bones were always under 
there, but you couldn't see them when they
were covered with "baby fat."
beeswing
response 35 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 27 18:23 UTC 1999

Horse bones.  Heheheee! Yeah Celine does have the horse effect, but I 
think that is also exacerbated by her stick-straight hair she's sporting 
now. Feh. 
clees
response 36 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jun 29 06:01 UTC 1999

A message from the skinny department.
All my life I have looked scrawny, skin to the bone.
Which also resulted in a total lack of what people consider male beauty,
 physically (muscles, broad shoulders, thight butt <no butt at all in my
 case)>. The last couple of years that has grown worse with all the 
Chippendales shit and such. Finally I am beginning to understand what 
most women must have been going through, being forced to an ideal you 
can never accomplish. Now that I am well in my thirties, at least I have
 *some* butt and my shoulders are getting broader as well, to keep
things  in balance my hair is thinning.
swa
response 37 of 69: Mark Unseen   Aug 25 04:18 UTC 1999

Hmm... I'd always been short and scrawny.  I know that this is genetic...
I come from a long line of short, scrawny women.  But it made me
self-conscious, because so many people seemed to see "skinny" and
"anorexic" as synonyms, and some made very rude comments. (I don't
'understand this; if you met someone who *was* anorexic, how exactly would
you be helping them by insulting them?)   I was healthy, just small. Very
delighted
to gain weight in college -- I now weigh somewhere around 125.  I'm still
self-conscious, although mostly I'm self-conscious about being short,
oddly enough.  Makes no sense.  

It scares me that among my generation, where women seem to be encouraging
each other and themselves to like their bodies more and more, men seem to
be doing the opposite.  My female  friends, on average, seem dissatisfied
with their bodies but a bit happier than my aunts or my mother's friends.
My male friends -- both fat *and* skinny -- generally feel quite
self-conscious about ti.  But maybe I've just got an atypical group of
friends.  <shrug>

I think that our society encourages people of all ages, genders and body
types to hate themselves.  Some succumb more than others.


 0-13   13-37   38-62   63-69       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss