You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-220 
 
Author Message
25 new of 220 responses total.
steve
response 125 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 21:50 UTC 1999

   I'd like to see it sitting there, about 2 feet ro the right of
Grex.  Knowing that its there ion the even of Grex blowing up gives
me a lot of comfort.
mary
response 126 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 22:55 UTC 1999

I'd like to update folks as to today.

First off, I have contacted four insurance agencies regarding
liability insurance.  I'm still waiting for one, Benz, to return
my call.  Dobson McComber came back with a premium I can't even
bring myself to type in.  It was that high.  Both Aprill Agency
and State Farm (Dan Gilec) seemed to understand the uniqueness
of our operation and budget constraints, both are checking into
policies, but they seem to think if the underwriter will consider
us under the right category we would be looking at around $250 
per year.  This is for liability insurance which will simply meet
the terms of the lease, no bells and whistles.  Yuck.  Again,
this figure is not firm, but it's a best guess until they get 
back with a specific quote.

Second, I was able to get over to Flying Dutchman this morning
to pick up the (signable) lease.  As I was sitting in the 
reception area there was a women standing at the counter, speaking
with the secretary.  She was talking in concerned tones about
rental rates, understanding that rent shouldn't be too high, but
the way the electric was being figured needed to be discussed.
And couldn't Susan do something about that?.  

Yep.  

I apologized for interrupting but introduced myself as being
from Cyberspace Inc., and asked if I could help out, maybe address
any concerns she was having.  I again explained about our power use,
the way we measure and re-measure with equipment changes, and the
honesty of our volunteer staff.  Ms. Van Fossen seemed to understand
but the concern was still there, enough that when I suggested we'd 
be happy to have an independent measurement taken her response was,
"Well, then I'd need to find someone."  I asked what we could do to
make her feel more comfortable about the way we pay our electric and
she offered, "Maybe check the consumption quarterly."  She concluded
by saying she tended to trust people until proven otherwise.  So
we left it that the way we've been paying electric could continue.
But I do know she has concerns.

I now have the lease and it states the following regarding our rent:
 
     Months 6/01/1999 - 5/31/2000  $66.15 per month
     
     Option 6/01/2000 - 5/31/2001  $69.46 per month
            6/01/2001 - 5/31/2002  $72.93 per month
            6/01/2002 - 5/31/2003  $76.58 per month
            6/01/2003 - 5/31/2004  $80.41 per month
            6/01/2004 - 5/31/2005  $84.43 per month

The option clause reads:

OPTION: Providing Tenant has not been in default of this lease, Tenant
shall have the option of five 1 year Lease extensions at a 5% 
increase in rent per year.  Said option may be cancelled with a written
ninety (90) day notice at the discretion of either Landlord or Tenant.

Ms. Watrous and I agreed on a 4 month, or 120 day notice period, but
this isn't what made it onto the finished version.  I expect this was
an oversight.  I've left a message for her to call back and I'll 
clarify this point.

There is nothing in the lease about our electric payments.

So that's where things are to this point.

Oh, one last thing.  I was really hoping that if the quoted insurance
premium was simply above and beyond what we could afford that we
could appeal to the Landlord to release us from liability.  When
Ms. Watrous handed me the lease (in front of Ms. Van Fossen) I 
mentioned I was having a heck of a time finding affordable insurance
for our shoestring budget organization.  Ms. Watrous said she really
didn't have any suggestions on agencies to try.  But after Ms. Watrous
left Ms. Van Fossen told me to try Aprill.  So I did.  But I think
that kind of answered my question about any release.
steve
response 127 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 23:11 UTC 1999

   $250 a year is managable, but just barely for the insurance.

   With regard to our electrical rates, here is something to remember
in your dealings with them: Grex's usage of electricty is way off
the norm, but both high and low.  By that, I mean that we're paying
nearly all of our electrical usage here.  A normal business in a room
like that, operating a standard business day would be using electricty
for 160 hours a month.  It would be entirely reasonable to assume that
said business would be consuming 700w per hour for the lights, computer,
copier, coffee machine, fax machine and whatever else they have.  That
usage adds up to about 112kW hours in the course of a month.

   Grex pays for its electrical usage, and uses very very little in 
the way of 'their' electricty (lights).  When I've been in the Pumkin
alone I usually turn on that 50w light, not the overhead lights.
Remind her of that--they're saving at least $10 a month because of
this.
richard
response 128 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 23:43 UTC 1999

But is it a good idea to agree to rent increases per year that are higher
than the current rate of inflation?  At the end of this lease, grex will
be paying 30% more in rent than it does now, yet has no guarantee it will
have any more members than it does now?  The realty company can offer this
deal to its corporate tenants because if the economy grows, those
companies should all be doing better business in six years.  Given
that Grex not able
to make that assumption, is it better off to have a fixed rent?  

Grex's average rent over the next six years (if you add all the increases
up) will be $75 a month.  Maybe grex could ask for a flat rate-- agree to
pay say $70 now as long as that price is guaranteed to be fixed for the
next five years.  Grex would be paying more money than it has to for the
first half of the lease and less than it has to for the last half, but the
realty company would be getting more *now* and can always terminate the
lease down the road.
steve
response 129 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 00:10 UTC 1999

   No, we can't get a fixed rate.  5% is not that bad, and although it
currently is not at the rate of inflation, we have no idea what the
future will bring.

   Of course there isn't any guarantee that we're going to have more members.
So what?  There is no warrenty on life.  Grex will just have to see what
the future brings us.

   However, electrical usage is always likely to slide in the downward
direction.

   Lastly I'll point out that we don't want to lock ourselves in this
particular building for five years.  Having the option of staying on
is nice, but we might want to move, for net access reasons, or perhaps
someday find some company that was willing to let us live in their
domain at terms we can deal with.  The point is, we just don't know.
richard
response 130 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 00:27 UTC 1999

but if grex could get a fixed rate somewhere else isnt moving worth
considering?  maybe grex cant get a fixed rate anywhere these days
though?
steve
response 131 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 01:02 UTC 1999

   What commercial entity gets fixed rates anywhere?  I think the
tradeoff between a fixed rate and the freedoms to move isn't worth
it.
aruba
response 132 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 01:03 UTC 1999

Well, of course, it would depend on the rate.  But I think a 5% increase each
year won't break our budget.  If we get a new member every 2 years that should
cover it.
aruba
response 133 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 01:04 UTC 1999

STeve slipped in - #132 was a response to #130.

Thanks again for doing all the legwork, Mary.
mary
response 134 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 03:03 UTC 1999

You're welcome.
rcurl
response 135 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 04:27 UTC 1999

$250 for standard liability insurance is very reasonable.
dpc
response 136 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 15:41 UTC 1999

Arbornet (M-Net) pays $300 per year for a "special businessowners
policy" from Hastings Mutual Insurance Company.  Our agent is
Dobson-McOmber!  For the $300/yr we get $1,000,000 commercial
general liability coverage, $500,000 each occurrence, plus a mixed
bag of other covrages including $5,000 medical expenses.  The 
"additional insured" is our landlord, the NEW Center.
        I see no reason why Grex shouldn't get exactly the same
coverage.
keesan
response 137 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 03:52 UTC 1999

Jim says fire protection in a computer room should be halon, not water.
Harmless to people, he thinks.
mdw
response 138 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 04:24 UTC 1999

I think halon got banned at some point.  Seems the people demoing it at
trade shows started getting cancer or something like that.  Halon was
also real expensive - much more than the cost of replacing our
equipment, even with new equipment.
steve
response 139 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 06:22 UTC 1999

   Halon is not an option, unforunately.  Yes, its the best thing,
but it isn't good to breathe.  Systems that use Halon were grandfathered
for either a while or forever, but as far as I know we can't legally
obtain it any more.
   The next best thing is a CO2 system.
rcurl
response 140 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 06:37 UTC 1999

No asphyxiant is good to breath, but Halon decomposes in fires to some
really nasty stuff, and it is also bad for the ozone layer. CO2, or even
just N2, would be fine. CO2 is especially good because it is heavier
than air and can be stored in greater quantities at lower pressure.
scott
response 141 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 12:03 UTC 1999

CO2 also has the nice lack of electronics-destroying properties, unlike water
and solid powder materials.
senna
response 142 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 12:10 UTC 1999

Remember, richard, Grex might be paying slightly more to stay in this 
location, but moving takes a big, immediate hit out of our wallet.  
Great job working things out, Mary. 

pfv
response 143 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 14:32 UTC 1999

        Halon was also found to be a Not A Good Thing (tm) for humans
        to breathe. Totally inert otherwise, recommended for delicate
        electronics.

        CO2 is another that is more than acceptable.. Getting an
        extinguisher with a fusable valve and/or sensor cannot be 
        all that unusual or expensive.. I mean.. How much can you possibly
        need for such a small space, fer cripes sake?

        Having it would certainly reduce any insurance costs, and..
        it sorta' bothers me to hear of "disposable" systems. At the
        least, I suspect the downtime would extend into weeks and that
        your membership (and fundage) would be effected.

headdoc
response 144 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 22:47 UTC 1999

Mary, thanks so much for handling a could-be-unpleasant job so quickly and
efficiently.  I am sure those of us who sue Grex every day salute you.
richard
response 145 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 23:18 UTC 1999

well lets see-- grex's average rent a month for the next six years
will be $75 a month...thats an extra, what, 15 bucks a month or 
$180 a year then grex pays now, or $1,080 over the life of the
lease.  Add to that at least $300 a month for indemnity insurance
and you get $1,380.  If Grex can find a place where they can pay the
same rent they pay now, or slightly more, and no indemnity insurance,
and it costs $800 or $900 to move, you are still talking about
signficant savings over the long haul.  Even if Grex has to buy
insurance somewhere else, you are still talking about savings if
they are living somewhere where there is no 30% total rent
increase.  

but maybe moving isnt worth it if all it might save is a c ouple
hundred dollars.
scg
response 146 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 23:44 UTC 1999

That $300 for insurance is per year, not per month, but I think you got that
right in your math, and just wrong when reciting figures.

However, I'm under the impression that that insurance is a pretty standard
part of commercial leases.  Also, you're assuming that we could find some
other equivillent space, in the Ann Arbor area, for $60 per month, rather than
the $75 we'd be paying in the Pumpkin.  Ann Arbor realestate tends to be quite
expensive.  Assuming that $60, because that's what we've been paying for a
few years, is the going rate for any room like that, and that a rent increase
of 5% a year is outrageous, doesn't work in the Ann Arbor realestate market,
where that's a pretty good price for a room that size.
albaugh
response 147 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 23:51 UTC 1999

> I am sure those of us who sue Grex every day salute you.

I hope no one sues grex ever, let alone every day!  :-)
mary
response 148 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 00:03 UTC 1999

Ms. Watrous mentioned to me at our first meeting that our space would go
for quite a bit more than what we're paying now if offered to a new
client.  When told the dimensions she said something just a little larger,
in the same building, just rented for $200 per month. 

I've heard back from State Farm and they are unable to offer
us a policy, or at least not anything that suits our needs
and budget.  The exact reason was the underwriter wasn't
interested in supporting a policy with such a small premium.
They used to do it, for PTO's and such, but no longer.

Aprill Agency did find a company with a policy that meets
the needs of the proposed lease.  Hastings Mutual will cover
us for a premium of $300 per year.  This is the same company
that covers M-Net although it sounds like we'll get slightly
more coverage for the same premium. 

I really need to get the proposed lease online, for everyone to
read.  Jan has offered to scan it in but I'm afraid he might
be too busy to get to it.  So, if it doesn't show by tomorrow,
I'll type it in.  Which means ya'll have to deal with my typos
and formatting. ;-)

richard
response 149 of 220: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 00:20 UTC 1999

why has grex never then had to have this insurance before now?  If it
has always lived in places that didnt require it, why assume that
such places are no longer available now?

wasnt the pumpkin one of a list of several suitable places that grex had
found at the time all in the same price range?

5% increases may not sound like much, but an extra $1,000+ in rent over
six years is a lot of money.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-220 
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss