You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   93-117   118-133     
 
Author Message
16 new of 133 responses total.
aruba
response 118 of 133: Mark Unseen   Apr 19 17:38 UTC 2001

No, I don't believe anyone has claimed to be the registered agent for
Property Exchange & Sales, Inc.
flem
response 119 of 133: Mark Unseen   Apr 19 17:51 UTC 2001

Fair enough.  I stand corrected.
scg
response 120 of 133: Mark Unseen   Apr 19 17:56 UTC 2001

Not that it's the least bit relevant here, but to what extent does a 
"registered agent" speak for a company.  I notice that the Delaware state 
government website features a list of companies that will be your 
corporation's resident agent, if you want to incorporate in Delaware (a 
state where incorporation seems to be the main industry).  If we're looking
for somebody to speak for a corporation it would be much better to look for
a corporate officer (and even then, in some companies, purchasing authority
gets delegated down farther).

But anyhow, I really don't think it's any of Grex's business to speculate on
the structure or motives of this company.  As far as we know, it's a company
trying to make a donation to Grex, and trying to get a membership in
recognition of that.  The notion that they must want something along with
their membership which we can't deliver, because otherwise they wouldn't want
a membership, seems unfounded at best.  Why are any of the rest of us members?
The current policies are pretty clear on what they allow and don't allow, so
the only real question is whether those policies are reasonable.
mdw
response 121 of 133: Mark Unseen   Apr 19 18:28 UTC 2001

I wouldn't be surprised to hear that the whole concept of "resident
agent" varies widely from state to state.  Nevada and Delaware had the
most lenient requirements to incorporate - non-residents can
incorporate.  If there's a need for a resident agent in either state,
then it would make sense for some individuals in both states to
specialize in offering "resident agent" services (presumably for a fee.)
No doubt the rules are even stranger in other countries - I understand
it's much more expensive for a non-profit to incorporate in Canada for
instance.
keesan
response 122 of 133: Mark Unseen   Apr 19 18:44 UTC 2001

I have been complaining to abuse@*.* about spam from their account holders,
and two of them wrote back promising to stop this from happening again.  Does
grex have a policy of terminating the membership of any member who uses grex
to send spam?   Is there some way to tell that someone is sending spam, other
than from recipients' complaints?  I ran across one little e-mail add-on that
would put all mail with bcc: (blind carbon copy) into a special folder for
you so it could easily be deleted, and just display the subject line.
aruba
response 123 of 133: Mark Unseen   Apr 20 00:32 UTC 2001

The board felt last night that it was time to send the check back, so I have
done so.  I also sent this email:

There was consensus at the board meeting last night that it's time to return 
your check, so I will mail it today.  As you realize, our policies do not 
permit us to offer you membership without proper identification, nor can we 
offer a corporation a voting membership, as you requested in your letter.

We certainly appreciate your desire to support Grex.  We also appreciate 
that you brought out some discussion about our ID policies.  It is good to 
examine our assumptions occasionally.  You are of course welcome to keep 
discussing the issues in our coop conference, and to participate in any 
other discussions on Grex.  We always welcome opposing viewpoints.

I hope in the future we can find a way for you to support us that is 
acceptable to everyone.
mdw
response 124 of 133: Mark Unseen   Apr 20 02:42 UTC 2001

Grex *members* rarely if ever send spam.  Occasionally, grex *users* who
are non-members send spam.  If detected in time, staff will kill
whatever process or script is sending spam, and disable the account.
It's then up to the user to contact staff and demonstrate a convincing
amount of regret and wont-do-it-again-ness before the account gets
turned back on.  Often, people who do this create "junk" accounts
specifically for the purpose.  In some cases, staff can identify a
"real" account associated with the same person, in which case that
account gets disabled as well.  Generally, even grex users don't tend to
send UCE - usually in these cases it's a "mail bombing" denial of
service attack against one individual.
rcurl
response 125 of 133: Mark Unseen   Apr 20 06:27 UTC 2001

A Michigan Resident Agent is the person required to be named, with
address, for the delivery of any official communications from the
State. The RA is not otherwise an officer of the corporation, or
can speak officially for the corporation (unless also delegated to
do so).
aruba
response 126 of 133: Mark Unseen   Apr 20 13:41 UTC 2001

Happily, the new "Corporation Information Update" forms from the State of
Michigan also include a line for "mailing address", which can be a P.O. Box
number, as well as lines for the name and address of the resident agent. 
The State acknowledged the last forms we submitted by sending mail to the
P.O. Box instead of to my house, for which I am thankful.
keesan
response 127 of 133: Mark Unseen   Apr 20 15:02 UTC 2001

How does grex distinguish between true spam and something like the Kiwanis
newsletter, which we were sending out once a week to 100 people with bcc:?
The spam that I get tends to be html (the newsletter was ascii).  
jep
response 128 of 133: Mark Unseen   Apr 20 15:50 UTC 2001

re #123: What an excellent job of non-confrontational communication.  
That's how it ought to be done.
carson
response 129 of 133: Mark Unseen   Apr 20 15:57 UTC 2001

(that's just one of the reasons we keep Mark around.)  :^)
aruba
response 130 of 133: Mark Unseen   Apr 20 16:46 UTC 2001

Thanks guys.  I had some help from people at the board meeting.
jep
response 131 of 133: Mark Unseen   Apr 21 03:47 UTC 2001

I would say some people at the Board meeting had some help from you.  
(-:
davel
response 132 of 133: Mark Unseen   Apr 23 13:12 UTC 2001

Agreed that Mark's letter is exactly on target.  Thanks, Mark.
aruba
response 133 of 133: Mark Unseen   May 10 14:50 UTC 2001

My friend Ken, who is an English professor at Bates College, checked into
the Hamlet discrepancy for me.  The Pelican edition I was quoting from is
based on the second or "good" quarto of 1604-05, "now usually regarded,
but without complete assurance, as printed from Shakespeare's own draft," 
according to the introduction.  The second quarto does indeed contain the
line "The lady doth protest too much, methinks."  The text Jamie was
quoting from is the First Folio, printed in 1623, "now usually regarded,
but again without complete assurance, as printed from the prompt-book of
Shakespeare's acting company or from the good quarto altered after
reference to such a prompt book."  The First Folio contains the line "The
lady protests too much, methinks." 

Ken points out that "The lady doth protest too much, methinks" is iambic
pentameter, but the "The lady protests too much, methinks" doesn't have as
nice a meter.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   93-117   118-133     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss