You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   89-113   114-138   139-163   164-188   189-213 
 214-238   239-263   264-278        
 
Author Message
25 new of 278 responses total.
tuwanda
response 114 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 1 06:35 UTC 1999

It's beginning to look like the obscure
quote item.
omni
response 115 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 1 07:04 UTC 1999

  How about Helen Keller?
Didn't she go to Radcliffe?
md
response 116 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 1 10:41 UTC 1999

Not Helen Keller.  This author had her portrait
painted by Picasso a few years before she wrote 
the book I'm quoting from.  She was anything but
obscure, although I admit most people haven't
read this particular book, which is said to be
influenced by cubism.  
happyboy
response 117 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 1 18:26 UTC 1999

gertrude stein
md
response 118 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 1 19:10 UTC 1999

Gertrude Stein is right.  The quotes are from
"Tender Buttons."  The Reverend is up.
happyboy
response 119 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 1 21:20 UTC 1999

the picasso info was a gimmee:)

a fragment:

When ranting round in Pleasure's ring,
  Religion may be blinded;
Or if she gie a random sting,
  It may be little minded;
But when on Life we're tempest-driv'n-
  A conscience but a canker-
A correspondence fix'd wi' Heav'n
  Is sure a noble anchor!
tuwanda
response 120 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 2 08:00 UTC 1999

Donne?  
remmers
response 121 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 2 11:39 UTC 1999

Sounds kinda Robert Burns-ish.
happyboy
response 122 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 2 20:59 UTC 1999

remmers is RIGHT-O-ROONY!
remmers
response 123 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 3 10:45 UTC 1999

What clued me was "gie" for "give", a bit of Scottish dialect I've seen
in other Burns poems.  ("Oh would some power the giftie gie us...")

Oh dear, this means I come up with another quote. I'll try to do that
later today.
bookworm
response 124 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 5 00:32 UTC 1999

I like Burns, but the only poem of his I'm familiar with is the "Red, 
Red Rose" poem.
flem
response 125 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 5 23:45 UTC 1999

re 103:  There is *so* mathematics.  :)
remmers
response 126 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 6 00:08 UTC 1999

Okay, here's my quote du jour:

     Having put his religious house in order, Mohammed now began to
enjoy his power as the undisputed ruler of a large number of Arab
tribes. But success has been the undoing of a large number of men who
were great in the days of adversity. He tried to gain the good will of
the rich people by a number of regulations which could appeal to those
of wealth. He allowed the Faithful to have four wives. As one wife was a
costly investment in those olden days when brides were bought directly
from the parents, four wives became a positive luxury except to those
who possessed camels and dromedaries and date orchards beyond the dreams
of avarice. A religion which at first had been meant for the hardy
hunters of the high-skied desert was gradually transformed to suit the
needs of the smug merchants who lived in the bazaars of the cities. It
was a regrettable change from the original program and it did very
little good to the cause of Hohammedanism. As for the prophet himself,
he went on preaching the truth of Allah and proclaiming new rules of
conduct until he died, quite suddenly, of a fever on June the seventh of
the year 632.
remmers
response 127 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 6 00:15 UTC 1999

(Spelling correction: should be "Mohammedanism" in 3rd from last line.)
mcnally
response 128 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 6 00:45 UTC 1999

  hmmm..  the sentiment sounds modern, but "Mohammedanism" suggests that
  this passage was written a while back (the term is not much in fashion
  these days and is probably pretty offensive to Moslems..)

remmers
response 129 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 6 09:43 UTC 1999

Right - it's 20th century, but not recent.
flem
response 130 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 6 18:51 UTC 1999

Bertrand Russell?  
remmers
response 131 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 6 22:13 UTC 1999

Not Bertrand Russell. But like Russell, the author is deceased.
jep
response 132 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 7 01:48 UTC 1999

There goes my Salman Rushdie guess... C. S. Lewis?
mcnally
response 133 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 7 05:24 UTC 1999

  T.E. Lawrence?
remmers
response 134 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 7 11:34 UTC 1999

Neither Lewis nor Lawrence.  I'll post another quote soon.
sogypant
response 135 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 7 13:41 UTC 1999

Kind of out of topic, but could anyone send me some URLS about Charles
Dickens' works?  I need to do a project for High School and I am doing it on
how Pip and other children are treated during his time.  I'd appreciate if
you send it to me via email.  I am sogypant@grex.cyberspace or something (I
I need



jep
response 136 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 7 14:40 UTC 1999

Go to any search engine and type in "Charles Dickens".  You will get 
more information than all of us here could provide you if we each 
dedicated ourselves to nothing else for a week.
i
response 137 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 7 23:49 UTC 1999

H. G. Wells?
remmers
response 138 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 8 11:17 UTC 1999

Not H. G. Wells. Good guess though. Here's another quote:

     Outwardly, the Roman state during the first century of our era was
a magnificent political structure, so large that Alexander's empire
became one of its minor provinces. Underneath this glory there lived
millions upon millions of poor and tired human beings, toiling like ants
who have built a nest underneath a heavy stone. They worked for the
benefit of someone else. They shared their food with the animals of the
fields. They lived in stables. They died without hope.
     It was the seven hundred and fifty-third year since the founding of
Rome. Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus Augustus was living in the palace
of the Palatine Hill, busily engaged upon the task of ruling his empire.
     In a little village of distant Syria, Mary, the wife of Joseph the
Carpenter, was tending her little boy, born in a stable of Bethlehem.
     This is a strange world.
     Before long, the palace and the stable were to meet in open combat.
     And the stable was to emerge victorious.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   89-113   114-138   139-163   164-188   189-213 
 214-238   239-263   264-278        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss