|
Grex > Language > #102: The seven letter word game, 1st edition |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 1177 responses total. |
gelinas
|
|
response 1127 of 1177:
| 
Dec 30 05:25 UTC 2000 |
quietus
|
kentn
|
|
response 1128 of 1177:
|
Dec 31 04:25 UTC 2000 |
quietus 1 (gelinas)
|
aruba
|
|
response 1129 of 1177:
|
Dec 31 05:12 UTC 2000 |
element
|
albaugh
|
|
response 1130 of 1177:
|
Dec 31 08:58 UTC 2000 |
complex
|
kentn
|
|
response 1131 of 1177:
|
Dec 31 16:51 UTC 2000 |
element 0 (aruba)
complex 0 (albaugh)
|
aruba
|
|
response 1132 of 1177:
|
Dec 31 18:59 UTC 2000 |
caraway
|
albaugh
|
|
response 1133 of 1177:
|
Dec 31 21:50 UTC 2000 |
towings
|
kentn
|
|
response 1134 of 1177:
|
Jan 1 04:27 UTC 2001 |
caraway 0 (aruba)
towings 0 (albaugh)
Hmmm...towings didn't sound right to me since towing is usually
a verb, but there are plenty of examples on the WWW of people using
"towings" so I've scored it.
|
aruba
|
|
response 1135 of 1177:
|
Jan 1 07:41 UTC 2001 |
adamant
|
kentn
|
|
response 1136 of 1177:
|
Jan 1 18:11 UTC 2001 |
adamant 0 (aruba)
|
gelinas
|
|
response 1137 of 1177:
|
Jan 2 21:12 UTC 2001 |
bustier
|
aruba
|
|
response 1138 of 1177:
|
Jan 2 21:42 UTC 2001 |
buffoon
|
albaugh
|
|
response 1139 of 1177:
|
Jan 3 07:21 UTC 2001 |
foolish
Yeah, towings was a reach. But if "a towing" is a single act of "towing away
a car", then it can be pluralized, if one dares. :-)
|
rcurl
|
|
response 1140 of 1177:
|
Jan 3 17:45 UTC 2001 |
"tow" is both a verb and a noun. As a verb, it has a present participle
"towing", which does not have a plural. As a noun, it has a gerund, also
"towing", which is a verbal noun, which can be made plural. "Towings" is
the plural of the gerund towing, based on the noun tow.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 1141 of 1177:
|
Jan 5 18:44 UTC 2001 |
What he said! :-)
|
kentn
|
|
response 1142 of 1177:
|
Jan 6 22:48 UTC 2001 |
bustier 1 (gelinas)
buffoon 1 (aruba)
foolish 0 (albaugh)
|
aruba
|
|
response 1143 of 1177:
|
Jan 7 03:30 UTC 2001 |
idiotic
|
kentn
|
|
response 1144 of 1177:
|
Jan 7 16:07 UTC 2001 |
idiotic 0 (aruba)
|
albaugh
|
|
response 1145 of 1177:
|
Jan 8 16:53 UTC 2001 |
stupids
|
aruba
|
|
response 1146 of 1177:
|
Jan 8 23:32 UTC 2001 |
Hmmm - I think Kevin is testing the limits. :)
outdoor
|
kentn
|
|
response 1147 of 1177:
|
Jan 9 03:23 UTC 2001 |
stupids 0 (albaugh)
outdoor 1 (aruba)
Hmmm...well stupid can be noun (a stupid person), so I guess
it can be plural.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 1148 of 1177:
|
Jan 9 05:07 UTC 2001 |
bumpkin
|
rcurl
|
|
response 1149 of 1177:
|
Jan 9 06:46 UTC 2001 |
In "a stupid person", stupid is an adjective, not a noun. The plural
of "stupid person" is "stupid persons". Adjectives cannot be pluralized.
Some words are either a noun or an adjective (e.g., red), and could
be made plural if used as a noun, but not as an adjective.
|
aruba
|
|
response 1150 of 1177:
|
Jan 9 14:44 UTC 2001 |
wishful
|
albaugh
|
|
response 1151 of 1177:
|
Jan 9 17:34 UTC 2001 |
Yabut Deep Purple had the following lyrics from the "Smoke on the Water" cut
on its "Machine Head" album: "...some stupid with a flare gun, burned the
place to the ground..." And if you can't trust Deep Purple, who *can* you
trust?! ;-)
|