|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 248 responses total. |
keesan
|
|
response 112 of 248:
| 
Nov 3 01:37 UTC 2002 |
I have polytarp on my don't write-tel-chat-talk list in .login (I just
checked) but keep getting talk requests anyway. What might I have done wrong
in setting this up? I used the change program.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 113 of 248:
|
Nov 3 01:39 UTC 2002 |
I only sent you ONE talk request.
Jesus Christ.
|
russ
|
|
response 114 of 248:
|
Nov 3 12:05 UTC 2002 |
Re #114: Turn off talk. Problem eliminated.
|
goose
|
|
response 115 of 248:
|
Nov 3 17:40 UTC 2002 |
There goes Russ, talking to himself again.....
|
polytarp
|
|
response 116 of 248:
|
Nov 4 04:01 UTC 2002 |
bkk ttyq7 10:30pm 24 10 lynx www.literotica.com
polytarp ttysb 10:25pm 32 2 grep bkk
3
I HOPE THIS WILL BE STOPPED.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 117 of 248:
|
Nov 4 04:06 UTC 2002 |
Why? And what should be stopped? Your using "ps -auxwwww"?
|
tsty
|
|
response 118 of 248:
|
Nov 4 08:51 UTC 2002 |
he doesn;t like literature
|
scott
|
|
response 119 of 248:
|
Nov 4 13:41 UTC 2002 |
Well, we haven't had any user complaints about polytarp's snooping. If we
do we'll take appropriate action.
|
davel
|
|
response 120 of 248:
|
Nov 4 14:14 UTC 2002 |
Appropriate action being to tell the complainant that we don't do anything
about such complaints?
|
janc
|
|
response 121 of 248:
|
Nov 4 17:22 UTC 2002 |
We do that? I thought we just blinked, hit delete, and proceeded to process
the next complaint.
|
janc
|
|
response 122 of 248:
|
Nov 4 17:24 UTC 2002 |
Hmmm...might be nice if lynx hid it's arguments the way "watch" does. I don't
really feel that anyone needs to know what anyone else is looking at.
|
gull
|
|
response 123 of 248:
|
Nov 4 17:48 UTC 2002 |
If you load lynx and use 'g' to specify the site you want to view, instead
of specifying it on the command line, your activities will be hidden a bit
better.
|
scott
|
|
response 124 of 248:
|
Nov 4 19:22 UTC 2002 |
(I was being facetious)
|
davel
|
|
response 125 of 248:
|
Nov 5 14:47 UTC 2002 |
(So was I.)
|
albaugh
|
|
response 126 of 248:
|
Nov 7 19:56 UTC 2002 |
I have to confirm that I, too, am seeing long delays in e-mail delivery to
grex, something I didn't used to see. There may not have been anyone
consciously done by anyone, but something could have changed in the
environment...
|
russ
|
|
response 127 of 248:
|
Nov 9 00:15 UTC 2002 |
The modem on -3596 is very noisy. Is there any chance of
replacing it with the one formerly on -2517 and seeing if
matters improve?
|
scott
|
|
response 128 of 248:
|
Nov 9 04:02 UTC 2002 |
Trouble is I don't know which modem was on 2517. :(
|
tpryan
|
|
response 129 of 248:
|
Nov 9 21:04 UTC 2002 |
Take a cell phone to the pumpkin. Dial the number.
Notice with one answers.
|
scott
|
|
response 130 of 248:
|
Nov 10 00:31 UTC 2002 |
"was".
|
russ
|
|
response 131 of 248:
|
Nov 15 12:35 UTC 2002 |
Mail from at least one system to Grex is being
dropped silently.
|
keesan
|
|
response 132 of 248:
|
Nov 15 14:50 UTC 2002 |
Mail is still arriving late - took more than 12 hours - so perhaps yours is
still on the way. One person wrote me that three of his mails to me bounced
due to the connection to grex timing out.
|
keesan
|
|
response 133 of 248:
|
Nov 15 17:12 UTC 2002 |
The person whose mail arrived late said she had tried several times yesterday
to email and it kept bouncing. She finally phoned my answering machine.
She does not get these bounce messages when mailing other places.
THis makes it sort of a problem to use email at grex for business purposes.
Right now email is working fine.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 134 of 248:
|
Nov 17 02:04 UTC 2002 |
Picospan will not accept my full title. As Autocrat of all Russias, I deserve,
expect, and demand better.
Fix it, or I will be upset.
|
janc
|
|
response 135 of 248:
|
Nov 17 14:37 UTC 2002 |
I doubt it.
|
remmers
|
|
response 136 of 248:
|
Nov 17 15:24 UTC 2002 |
I move that a name length limit of 48 characters be implemented.
|
