|
Grex > Coop12 > #49: Nominations for the Board of Directors | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 332 responses total. |
richard
|
|
response 112 of 332:
| 
Nov 13 16:59 UTC 2001 |
Isnt dpc, an mnet board member, also an aclu lawyer? I guess jp2
approves of "aclu commies" as long as they are mnet and not grex?
|
remmers
|
|
response 113 of 332:
|
Nov 13 17:13 UTC 2001 |
Dave Cahill is an attorney but not with the ACLU.
|
pthomas
|
|
response 114 of 332:
|
Nov 13 18:11 UTC 2001 |
As I recall Jamie is a card-carrying member of the ACLU.
|
jep
|
|
response 115 of 332:
|
Nov 13 21:01 UTC 2001 |
I apologize for causing the drift. I only meant to explain that there
are several reasons why I wouldn't be a good Board member for Grex.
If I ever do run, I'm sure I'll have to explain my reasons for opposing
certain Grex policies -- in fact, changing policies would be the only
reason I could see myself running. Grexers don't want the kind of
changes I want, so it would not make much sense for me to run at this
time.
|
remmers
|
|
response 116 of 332:
|
Nov 14 22:00 UTC 2001 |
Reminder: Tomorrow, Thursday November 15, is the last day to place
new names in nomination. Nominees have until the start of balloting
on December 1 to accept and to meet the membership requirement.
|
janc
|
|
response 117 of 332:
|
Nov 14 22:08 UTC 2001 |
I think the current list is:
ACCEPTED
jp2
bhelliom
mary
mdw
orinoco
kaplin
flem
NOMINATED
other
cmcgee
krj
danr
DECLINED
eeyore
janc
davel
scott
arabella
jep
Seven candidates for four positions is pretty good. Today is the last day
for nominations, I think, but people who have been nominated can still ponder
over whether or not to accept for a while longer.
|
janc
|
|
response 118 of 332:
|
Nov 14 22:09 UTC 2001 |
Oops, "kaplan" not "kaplin".
|
other
|
|
response 119 of 332:
|
Nov 14 22:15 UTC 2001 |
I have decided that I like my knees relatively intact.
|
janc
|
|
response 120 of 332:
|
Nov 14 22:23 UTC 2001 |
I'm guessing that that is a acceptance, but I believe the election czar likes
his acceptances to be explicit.
|
other
|
|
response 121 of 332:
|
Nov 14 22:35 UTC 2001 |
I have decided to accept nomination for another term as a Director of
Cyberspace Communications, Incorporated.
|
remmers
|
|
response 122 of 332:
|
Nov 15 02:01 UTC 2001 |
<remmers applauds other's explicitness>
Nominations run through the 15th, so folks still have a day to place
new names in nomination.
|
janc
|
|
response 123 of 332:
|
Nov 15 03:37 UTC 2001 |
In that case, I'd like to nominate dpc, gelinas, i, rcurl, russ, and tpryan.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 124 of 332:
|
Nov 15 04:28 UTC 2001 |
uhh.... watching the school board keeps me plenty busy, especially on
Wednesdays. Sailing Club treasury burns off more time. Nonetheless, I'm
flattered. Since I won't mind losing, I accept the nomination. :)
|
krj
|
|
response 125 of 332:
|
Nov 15 05:27 UTC 2001 |
I am leaning against accepting my nomination, but I shall relish
the opportunity to dither for two more weeks.
|
mary
|
|
response 126 of 332:
|
Nov 15 12:35 UTC 2001 |
mary thanks other.
|
jp2
|
|
response 127 of 332:
|
Nov 15 14:40 UTC 2001 |
This response has been erased.
|
mooncat
|
|
response 128 of 332:
|
Nov 15 23:00 UTC 2001 |
<mooncat is very glad bhelliom accepted her nomination, and really
hopes that cmcgee will accept hers>
|
orinoco
|
|
response 129 of 332:
|
Nov 16 00:28 UTC 2001 |
Re #125: Sounds like a scandal in the making, Ken. We're mostly pretty
liberal folks here, but imagine the impression it would make on the community
at large if it came out that a board member relished dithering.
I second Mary's thanks, and Anne's hopefulness.
|
remmers
|
|
response 130 of 332:
|
Nov 16 03:34 UTC 2001 |
Well, at least dither relishing isn't bad as practicing thespianism
and public mastication.
|
other
|
|
response 131 of 332:
|
Nov 16 16:48 UTC 2001 |
Hey now! I resemble that remark!
|
i
|
|
response 132 of 332:
|
Nov 18 13:49 UTC 2001 |
Re: #123
Many thanks, janc, buy i currently have too many other time commitments
currently to feel that i can honestly accept.
|
russ
|
|
response 133 of 332:
|
Nov 25 21:47 UTC 2001 |
I must regretfully turn down my nomination to run for BoD at
this time. It would be worthwhile, perhaps, to help fill out
the field, and stand more or less for the status quo ante.
But I don't think I could devote sufficient time to policy
issues with the other balls I have in the air right now.
|
dpc
|
|
response 134 of 332:
|
Nov 27 21:44 UTC 2001 |
Sorry, I can't accept my nomination either. Thanx, though!
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 135 of 332:
|
Nov 28 00:16 UTC 2001 |
How many people have accepted nominations? How many seats are open?
|
aruba
|
|
response 136 of 332:
|
Nov 28 00:39 UTC 2001 |
4 seats are open. I also would like an updated list of nominees and
nominees who have accepted and declined.
|