|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 16 new of 26 responses total. |
tod
|
|
response 11 of 26:
| 
Sep 4 23:51 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 12 of 26:
|
Sep 5 05:36 UTC 2003 |
resp:10 (in re:9) they must be freakin' closed minded, then, because
they sure as hell don't teach the stuff at home. Inquiring kids
shouldn't have to go to the library or learn it from their friends.
(I mostly went to the library and um, other media.. yeah.)
resp:5 Actually, it wouldn't be a bad idea to maybe link this to the
sex/cflirt cf-- it's been kinda quiet and could use a new item. (It's
sometimes nice to have an agora item linked to one of the other less
active cfs.)
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 13 of 26:
|
Sep 5 11:13 UTC 2003 |
mynxcat, the sex cf is not closed to minors. It's not closed at all.
|
tod
|
|
response 14 of 26:
|
Sep 5 16:27 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 15 of 26:
|
Sep 5 16:32 UTC 2003 |
I've seen untaker around before. Seemed a little out of character, but hey,
it's been a while
|
tod
|
|
response 16 of 26:
|
Sep 5 16:51 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 17 of 26:
|
Sep 5 16:54 UTC 2003 |
That I agree with
|
happyboy
|
|
response 18 of 26:
|
Sep 5 18:17 UTC 2003 |
UNTAKER IS A PERVERT.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 19 of 26:
|
Sep 5 23:59 UTC 2003 |
heh.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 20 of 26:
|
Sep 7 14:46 UTC 2003 |
With everything else in this conference, it's silly to suggest we censor
reasonable sex advice because kids might read it.
|
other
|
|
response 21 of 26:
|
Sep 9 03:03 UTC 2003 |
...or unreasonable sex advice because tod posted it.
|
oval
|
|
response 22 of 26:
|
Sep 9 15:53 UTC 2003 |
and furthermore - does everyone think the chick was lying? it ain't probable,
but is possible that she came twice in 10 minutes. :P
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 23 of 26:
|
Sep 9 23:20 UTC 2003 |
With a guy who'd never done it before? I'll agree on not probable, but
possible. Maybe she gives good directions, and he listens well.
|
other
|
|
response 24 of 26:
|
Sep 10 00:54 UTC 2003 |
Maybe she'd never been paid that kind of attention and was incredibly
susceptible to its stimulating effect.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 25 of 26:
|
Sep 10 05:30 UTC 2003 |
maybe she was doin' it for herself.
|
lynne
|
|
response 26 of 26:
|
Sep 10 22:24 UTC 2003 |
There's a pretty wide variety of responsiveness in women; sometimes even in
the same woman. I don't automatically accept that she was lying. Neither
do I automatically accept that it's any of my business.
|