You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   84-108   109-133   134-158   159-183   184-208 
 209-233   234-258   259-283   284-293       
 
Author Message
25 new of 293 responses total.
gelinas
response 109 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 04:53 UTC 2002

Yes.
tsty
response 110 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 25 09:58 UTC 2002

staff: question: is the protocol gelinas used on um's pine applicable
to the pine that grex uses? 
senna
response 111 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 25 09:59 UTC 2002

Last night and this morning, Grex has been randomly killing my connection
after short (five-ten minutes) periods of time.  The rest of my internet
connection works fine while this is happening, but I get nothing here.  Any
ideas?
gelinas
response 112 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 25 13:19 UTC 2002

try a traceroute from your starting point to grex; look for dropped packets.
jp2
response 113 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 25 14:49 UTC 2002

This response has been erased.

davel
response 114 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 25 15:15 UTC 2002

Re 112 re 111: This has happened to me intermittently, but way too often,
lately.  But I was dialed in, and my starting point was just the term server,
I think.
russ
response 115 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 18:56 UTC 2002

Amidst a download of a pile of e-mail, I got this on my tty:

Sat Jan 26 13:52:03
This terminal has been idle 15 minutes. If it remains idle
for 5 more minutes it will be logged out by the system.

Can't Grex recognize that a terminal running something like sz
is NOT idle and should NOT have unwanted data dumped on it,
let alone be cut off?
tsty
response 116 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 21:51 UTC 2002

i thought that had been fixed when yu were in short  pants?
davel
response 117 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 22:30 UTC 2002

I'm rather puzzled as to how you saw the message, if it was in the middle of
a file transfer.
russ
response 118 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 19:59 UTC 2002

The "down until approximately 1 PM" notice on Grex was still playing
at 1:42 PM.  If backups are going to take longer or be started later,
it would be much friendlier of staff to correct the estimate to be
closer to reality.
gull
response 119 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 20:28 UTC 2002

The problem may be that if it's not known that it'll take longer before 
the backups are started, changing the estimate would require modifying 
a filesystem being backed up, which is generally considered a Bad Idea.
aruba
response 120 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 22:39 UTC 2002

Thanks, Scott, for doing that backup!
drew
response 121 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 23:55 UTC 2002

Re #119: Not necessarily. It's possible to put both multiple filesystems and
multiple OSes on a single machine, and even on a single hard drive! A small
special purpose OS/filesystem could be dedicated to showing the estimate and
running the backup software.
russ
response 122 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 28 00:21 UTC 2002

Re #117:  It was actually just a bit after downloading over 1/2 megabyte
of e-mail and conference text.  Regardless, it should not have occurred.
Even if the idle-killer checks the tty to see if it's in raw mode and
ignores it, one could be logged out immediately after finishing a
download if the timing is exactly wrong.
polytarp
response 123 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 28 00:42 UTC 2002

Pl-e--a---s----e-----! -I-- ---n----e-----ed- --h---e----l-----p!-
B--r---o----k-----en- --t---h----i-----s -i--s---!----
mvpel
response 124 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 29 01:14 UTC 2002

Grex does not appear to be running the Network Time Protocol daemon, and its
clock is coming up on a minute fast.
tsty
response 125 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 29 15:02 UTC 2002

threr might be an Xnix version as well, but     nistime32   (googls search)
is an excellent windoze time synchronizer, fwiw. even works
on xp!
mvpel
response 126 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 07:53 UTC 2002

Re: 110 - Back when I first deployed Pine at UM, I used the IMAP protocol.
I doubt that anything has changed since then.  If you set your mailbox to
{mailserver.name.whatever}INBOX, Pine will attempt to use IMAP to connect to
it.
keesan
response 127 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jan 31 22:43 UTC 2002

Thanks to whoever fixed the modems (if anyone did) so that I was able to
download 43 packets with kermit instead of crashing after packet 12,
at normal speed.  Are the newer faster modems installed now?
tsty
response 128 of 293: Mark Unseen   Feb 1 09:55 UTC 2002

mvpel, whaqt i need to do is point pine to MY CHOICE of inbox
files (into which i save special emails tha require pine). 
  
as shown above, i hard-coded the INBOX path but still get that
sily error about " context   ']' "
  
i wo nOT wnat pine to handle everything. mail is JustGreat (tm).
jep
response 129 of 293: Mark Unseen   Feb 1 14:59 UTC 2002

Backtalk is down right now.
mvpel
response 130 of 293: Mark Unseen   Feb 1 17:15 UTC 2002

I'm pretty sure you can just specify the file pathname instead of INBOX.
janc
response 131 of 293: Mark Unseen   Feb 1 21:58 UTC 2002

Personally, I prefer mutt to pine when I have to send mail with attachments.
tsty
response 132 of 293: Mark Unseen   Feb 2 22:27 UTC 2002

re 130  ... omit the filename? the 'directions' dont indicate
path-only as i read them. 
,
twill
response 133 of 293: Mark Unseen   Feb 5 23:50 UTC 2002

Hi, I'm Twill!
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   84-108   109-133   134-158   159-183   184-208 
 209-233   234-258   259-283   284-293       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss