|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 278 responses total. |
bookworm
|
|
response 108 of 278:
| 
Apr 30 17:21 UTC 1999 |
Wow! Whoever he is, this guy is prolific.
|
md
|
|
response 109 of 278:
|
Apr 30 17:26 UTC 1999 |
Hint: dead white Cliffie.
|
remmers
|
|
response 110 of 278:
|
Apr 30 18:26 UTC 1999 |
Re resp:108 - Yep, real prolific. Wrote at least three paragraphs. :)
|
aruba
|
|
response 111 of 278:
|
Apr 30 21:07 UTC 1999 |
What's a Cliffie?
|
md
|
|
response 112 of 278:
|
May 1 03:05 UTC 1999 |
Radcliffe student or alum.
|
md
|
|
response 113 of 278:
|
May 1 03:11 UTC 1999 |
Hint: The work quoted was published in 1914.
|
tuwanda
|
|
response 114 of 278:
|
May 1 06:35 UTC 1999 |
It's beginning to look like the obscure
quote item.
|
omni
|
|
response 115 of 278:
|
May 1 07:04 UTC 1999 |
How about Helen Keller?
Didn't she go to Radcliffe?
|
md
|
|
response 116 of 278:
|
May 1 10:41 UTC 1999 |
Not Helen Keller. This author had her portrait
painted by Picasso a few years before she wrote
the book I'm quoting from. She was anything but
obscure, although I admit most people haven't
read this particular book, which is said to be
influenced by cubism.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 117 of 278:
|
May 1 18:26 UTC 1999 |
gertrude stein
|
md
|
|
response 118 of 278:
|
May 1 19:10 UTC 1999 |
Gertrude Stein is right. The quotes are from
"Tender Buttons." The Reverend is up.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 119 of 278:
|
May 1 21:20 UTC 1999 |
the picasso info was a gimmee:)
a fragment:
When ranting round in Pleasure's ring,
Religion may be blinded;
Or if she gie a random sting,
It may be little minded;
But when on Life we're tempest-driv'n-
A conscience but a canker-
A correspondence fix'd wi' Heav'n
Is sure a noble anchor!
|
tuwanda
|
|
response 120 of 278:
|
May 2 08:00 UTC 1999 |
Donne?
|
remmers
|
|
response 121 of 278:
|
May 2 11:39 UTC 1999 |
Sounds kinda Robert Burns-ish.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 122 of 278:
|
May 2 20:59 UTC 1999 |
remmers is RIGHT-O-ROONY!
|
remmers
|
|
response 123 of 278:
|
May 3 10:45 UTC 1999 |
What clued me was "gie" for "give", a bit of Scottish dialect I've seen
in other Burns poems. ("Oh would some power the giftie gie us...")
Oh dear, this means I come up with another quote. I'll try to do that
later today.
|
bookworm
|
|
response 124 of 278:
|
May 5 00:32 UTC 1999 |
I like Burns, but the only poem of his I'm familiar with is the "Red,
Red Rose" poem.
|
flem
|
|
response 125 of 278:
|
May 5 23:45 UTC 1999 |
re 103: There is *so* mathematics. :)
|
remmers
|
|
response 126 of 278:
|
May 6 00:08 UTC 1999 |
Okay, here's my quote du jour:
Having put his religious house in order, Mohammed now began to
enjoy his power as the undisputed ruler of a large number of Arab
tribes. But success has been the undoing of a large number of men who
were great in the days of adversity. He tried to gain the good will of
the rich people by a number of regulations which could appeal to those
of wealth. He allowed the Faithful to have four wives. As one wife was a
costly investment in those olden days when brides were bought directly
from the parents, four wives became a positive luxury except to those
who possessed camels and dromedaries and date orchards beyond the dreams
of avarice. A religion which at first had been meant for the hardy
hunters of the high-skied desert was gradually transformed to suit the
needs of the smug merchants who lived in the bazaars of the cities. It
was a regrettable change from the original program and it did very
little good to the cause of Hohammedanism. As for the prophet himself,
he went on preaching the truth of Allah and proclaiming new rules of
conduct until he died, quite suddenly, of a fever on June the seventh of
the year 632.
|
remmers
|
|
response 127 of 278:
|
May 6 00:15 UTC 1999 |
(Spelling correction: should be "Mohammedanism" in 3rd from last line.)
|
mcnally
|
|
response 128 of 278:
|
May 6 00:45 UTC 1999 |
hmmm.. the sentiment sounds modern, but "Mohammedanism" suggests that
this passage was written a while back (the term is not much in fashion
these days and is probably pretty offensive to Moslems..)
|
remmers
|
|
response 129 of 278:
|
May 6 09:43 UTC 1999 |
Right - it's 20th century, but not recent.
|
flem
|
|
response 130 of 278:
|
May 6 18:51 UTC 1999 |
Bertrand Russell?
|
remmers
|
|
response 131 of 278:
|
May 6 22:13 UTC 1999 |
Not Bertrand Russell. But like Russell, the author is deceased.
|
jep
|
|
response 132 of 278:
|
May 7 01:48 UTC 1999 |
There goes my Salman Rushdie guess... C. S. Lewis?
|