|
Grex > Coop12 > #15: Grex's ID policy - email with account usgov |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 133 responses total. |
aruba
|
|
response 107 of 133:
|
Apr 18 16:34 UTC 2001 |
(You should enter that in a separate item, Colleen, if you'd like the
membership to vote on it.)
Sigh. albaugh's #105 was based on a misunderstanding of other's response.
So was incorrect in saying that institutional members receive no benefits
for membership other than protection from reaping. They also receive full
internet access.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 108 of 133:
|
Apr 18 17:42 UTC 2001 |
...and the good feeling of supporting a worthwhile charitable organization...
|
albaugh
|
|
response 109 of 133:
|
Apr 18 19:11 UTC 2001 |
I don't know how many altruistic "good feelers" there are out there... ;-)
|
flem
|
|
response 110 of 133:
|
Apr 18 19:47 UTC 2001 |
Rane mentioned earlier that we should accept the resident agent of a
corporation's name, address, etc. as contact information for a institutional
membership. This is certainly not unreasonable. What we also need, however,
is confirmation *from that person* that he or she authorizes the account.
To do so, we need some kind of confirmation that the person we're talking to
in order to get this confirmation is in fact the person we think it is.
Hence, we get right back to our current ID policy: requiring personal ID for
the contact person.
What usgov is asking us to do is to take his word for it that he's the
resident agent for PE&S, without providing any identification to prove this
claim. It would clearly be irresponsible for us to do so.
Usgov, you're right that Grex is not in the verification business, and we
probably wouldn't know if someone provided us fake id. We do, however, have
to make a good faith attempt to verify the identity of our members. A good
faith attempt does not require us to go to extraordinary lengths to verify
that the user is not trying to commit fraud or impersonate someone else, but
we do have to get some identification. We're sorry, but in this day and age,
taking your word for it that you represent PE&S would be negligent of us.
|
pfv
|
|
response 111 of 133:
|
Apr 18 19:55 UTC 2001 |
If the banks expect an ID AND signature , for those capable of
signing a check, I see no reason to expect less from grex and
their "business accounts". Anything less is folly.
Nastiness has nothing to do with a twits attempt to subvert or
change a process.
|
swa
|
|
response 112 of 133:
|
Apr 19 03:56 UTC 2001 |
Usgov -- do you understand the difference between being a user and being a
member? A lot of organizations use the term "member" to mean "anyone who
participates" - on Grex a member is someone who agrees to contribute money
in exchange for certain extra privileges. Contributing money is
because they want to support Grex, and who receive certain (not huge)
extra privileges in return. Contributing money is absolutely *not*
required in order to use Grex. Some of your comments lead me to think
maybe that distinction hadn't been made clear to you.
I'd also suggest you read our bylaws
(http://www.cyberspace.org/local/grex/bylaws.html) to familiarize yourself
with how Grex works and get an understanding of why we've reacted so
harshly to some of your suggestions, like that only corporate members
should vote on the membership -- read the bylaws and you'll understand
that members don't vote on new memberships at all, corporate members don't
vote, and no individual member can be excluded from voting on anything.
I agree with those who've said your choice of login is dubious at best.
But I also agree with Mary that there seems to be at least as much
miscommunication her as anything else. Read up on how Grex works and
maybe you'll understand why we've responded as we have.
|
swa
|
|
response 113 of 133:
|
Apr 19 03:57 UTC 2001 |
And I'd always taken "heathen" to mean something more akin to "heretic"
than to "pagan." For what that's worth.
|
robh
|
|
response 114 of 133:
|
Apr 19 04:46 UTC 2001 |
Re 113 - "Heathen" means "someone who lives in the heath",
aka a rural dweller, and originally had the same implications
of low intelligence and culture that we moderns associate
with the words "hick" or "redneck". "Pagan" comes from the
Latin "paganus" meaning "man with a beard", and in the days
when the clean-shaven look was popular in the city, had the
same connotations as "heathen".
"Heretic" originally referred to someone whose interpretation
of Catholic doctrine was different from the "official" interpretation
of the Pope.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 115 of 133:
|
Apr 19 07:05 UTC 2001 |
Re #110: did msgov imply somewhere that he is the resident agent for PE&S?
We know who the resident agent is. If we were playing 20 questions, I
would guess that usgov is the son of the resident agent... 8^}
cmcgee moved to "reaffirm our current policy". That of course is not in
order, since current policy IS current policy, and so the motion is
redudant. Acting on such a motion would, in fact, set a precedent for NOT
considering other current policies as current enough.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 116 of 133:
|
Apr 19 17:09 UTC 2001 |
s/redundant/redudant
|
flem
|
|
response 117 of 133:
|
Apr 19 17:26 UTC 2001 |
Hmm. I'd assumed he claimed to be the RA because 1) he seems to be claiming
to speak for the company, and 2) the name given is "Rick", which ISTR matches
the first name of the RA. But I've not investigated either of those vague
memories. :)
|
aruba
|
|
response 118 of 133:
|
Apr 19 17:38 UTC 2001 |
No, I don't believe anyone has claimed to be the registered agent for
Property Exchange & Sales, Inc.
|
flem
|
|
response 119 of 133:
|
Apr 19 17:51 UTC 2001 |
Fair enough. I stand corrected.
|
scg
|
|
response 120 of 133:
|
Apr 19 17:56 UTC 2001 |
Not that it's the least bit relevant here, but to what extent does a
"registered agent" speak for a company. I notice that the Delaware state
government website features a list of companies that will be your
corporation's resident agent, if you want to incorporate in Delaware (a
state where incorporation seems to be the main industry). If we're looking
for somebody to speak for a corporation it would be much better to look for
a corporate officer (and even then, in some companies, purchasing authority
gets delegated down farther).
But anyhow, I really don't think it's any of Grex's business to speculate on
the structure or motives of this company. As far as we know, it's a company
trying to make a donation to Grex, and trying to get a membership in
recognition of that. The notion that they must want something along with
their membership which we can't deliver, because otherwise they wouldn't want
a membership, seems unfounded at best. Why are any of the rest of us members?
The current policies are pretty clear on what they allow and don't allow, so
the only real question is whether those policies are reasonable.
|
mdw
|
|
response 121 of 133:
|
Apr 19 18:28 UTC 2001 |
I wouldn't be surprised to hear that the whole concept of "resident
agent" varies widely from state to state. Nevada and Delaware had the
most lenient requirements to incorporate - non-residents can
incorporate. If there's a need for a resident agent in either state,
then it would make sense for some individuals in both states to
specialize in offering "resident agent" services (presumably for a fee.)
No doubt the rules are even stranger in other countries - I understand
it's much more expensive for a non-profit to incorporate in Canada for
instance.
|
keesan
|
|
response 122 of 133:
|
Apr 19 18:44 UTC 2001 |
I have been complaining to abuse@*.* about spam from their account holders,
and two of them wrote back promising to stop this from happening again. Does
grex have a policy of terminating the membership of any member who uses grex
to send spam? Is there some way to tell that someone is sending spam, other
than from recipients' complaints? I ran across one little e-mail add-on that
would put all mail with bcc: (blind carbon copy) into a special folder for
you so it could easily be deleted, and just display the subject line.
|
aruba
|
|
response 123 of 133:
|
Apr 20 00:32 UTC 2001 |
The board felt last night that it was time to send the check back, so I have
done so. I also sent this email:
There was consensus at the board meeting last night that it's time to return
your check, so I will mail it today. As you realize, our policies do not
permit us to offer you membership without proper identification, nor can we
offer a corporation a voting membership, as you requested in your letter.
We certainly appreciate your desire to support Grex. We also appreciate
that you brought out some discussion about our ID policies. It is good to
examine our assumptions occasionally. You are of course welcome to keep
discussing the issues in our coop conference, and to participate in any
other discussions on Grex. We always welcome opposing viewpoints.
I hope in the future we can find a way for you to support us that is
acceptable to everyone.
|
mdw
|
|
response 124 of 133:
|
Apr 20 02:42 UTC 2001 |
Grex *members* rarely if ever send spam. Occasionally, grex *users* who
are non-members send spam. If detected in time, staff will kill
whatever process or script is sending spam, and disable the account.
It's then up to the user to contact staff and demonstrate a convincing
amount of regret and wont-do-it-again-ness before the account gets
turned back on. Often, people who do this create "junk" accounts
specifically for the purpose. In some cases, staff can identify a
"real" account associated with the same person, in which case that
account gets disabled as well. Generally, even grex users don't tend to
send UCE - usually in these cases it's a "mail bombing" denial of
service attack against one individual.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 125 of 133:
|
Apr 20 06:27 UTC 2001 |
A Michigan Resident Agent is the person required to be named, with
address, for the delivery of any official communications from the
State. The RA is not otherwise an officer of the corporation, or
can speak officially for the corporation (unless also delegated to
do so).
|
aruba
|
|
response 126 of 133:
|
Apr 20 13:41 UTC 2001 |
Happily, the new "Corporation Information Update" forms from the State of
Michigan also include a line for "mailing address", which can be a P.O. Box
number, as well as lines for the name and address of the resident agent.
The State acknowledged the last forms we submitted by sending mail to the
P.O. Box instead of to my house, for which I am thankful.
|
keesan
|
|
response 127 of 133:
|
Apr 20 15:02 UTC 2001 |
How does grex distinguish between true spam and something like the Kiwanis
newsletter, which we were sending out once a week to 100 people with bcc:?
The spam that I get tends to be html (the newsletter was ascii).
|
jep
|
|
response 128 of 133:
|
Apr 20 15:50 UTC 2001 |
re #123: What an excellent job of non-confrontational communication.
That's how it ought to be done.
|
carson
|
|
response 129 of 133:
|
Apr 20 15:57 UTC 2001 |
(that's just one of the reasons we keep Mark around.) :^)
|
aruba
|
|
response 130 of 133:
|
Apr 20 16:46 UTC 2001 |
Thanks guys. I had some help from people at the board meeting.
|
jep
|
|
response 131 of 133:
|
Apr 21 03:47 UTC 2001 |
I would say some people at the Board meeting had some help from you.
(-:
|