You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   82-106   107-108     
 
Author Message
2 new of 108 responses total.
mary
response 107 of 108: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 00:20 UTC 2004

Not quite, David.  More, it's unclear as to whether rules would have 
made a difference in Valerie's actions.

I think Grex needs to move on.  Joe is looking for a way users can 
make system policy, giving item authors guidance on what they can 
and can't do.  This makes more sense to me than putting handcuffs on 
staff.
gull
response 108 of 108: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 01:06 UTC 2004

I'm withdrawing this proposal.  gelinas has entered one in item:111 that 
would accomplish basically the same thing, and has the following 
advantages:

- It's more elegantly worded, and clearer, thanks to approaching the 
problem from a slightly different angle.
- It doesn't explicitly put limits on staff, and gelinas himself is a 
staff member.  This avoids the appearance of ordinary members dictating 
restrictions on staff, something that was a source of strong opposition 
to my proposal.  Politically, it's more carefully crafted.

Further discussion should probably shift to item:111.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   82-106   107-108     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss