You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   81-105   106-130   131-155   156-180   181-205 
 206-230   231-236         
 
Author Message
25 new of 236 responses total.
happyboy
response 106 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 12 19:09 UTC 2000

        YOU HEARD ME!!!


happyboy
response 107 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 12 19:09 UTC 2000

105 slipped.
lelande
response 108 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 12 19:11 UTC 2000

i's gonna aszoom he miens jim jarmusch, dewrecktor bourne in the bahttim 
of a barryl o' bergen.
carla
response 109 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 12 19:16 UTC 2000

Ok, thanks..
otaking
response 110 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 17:13 UTC 2000

"wild At Heart" was a fun Lynch movie, but not very good.
remmers
response 111 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 11:22 UTC 2000

Caught the restored "Blood Simple" at the Michigan Theater the
other night.  It's the Coen brothers' first movie, and I'd
managed to miss it all these years despite being a Coen
brothers fan.  Well worth the wait -- a truly delicious (but
be forewarned, very violent) black comedy of errors.  M. Emmet
Walsh is great as the sleazy private eye.
jerryr
response 112 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 13:30 UTC 2000

m. emmet walsh plays sleazy as well as james woods plays crazy.
otaking
response 113 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 15 02:44 UTC 2000

I saw "Running Mates" on TNT last night. It was an interesting
behind-the-scenes political movie, but more fluff than drama. I liked Laura
Linney's performance as the campaign manager. I also liked that the trailers
showed that Pryce (Tom Selleck) had multiple affairs, but didn't make it a
major part of the plot. Instead it focused more on special interests.

It wasn't cutting-edge drama, but it was entertaining.
qui1
response 114 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 18 16:42 UTC 2000

I saw Coyote Ugly. Yuck. The femmes were gorgeous, but that
was about it. The acting was ridiculous, a given and I was not 
even sure that there was a plot other than "shake ya ass, show me 
whatchew workin' wit"

Do not waste money on this movie, donate it to my "Save the Ferns"
fund.
ashke
response 115 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 18 17:42 UTC 2000

I saw "Space Coyboys" a few weeks ago when it first came out.  It was amazing.
Truly great.  If I could afford it, I would see it again and again.

tod
response 116 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 18 17:48 UTC 2000

I thought it was a cute movie, but it got too "cute" with the 'Cocoon-esque'
happy-go-lucky attitude about turning old.  Frankly, watching James
Garner try to run pained me, and seeing an old Donald Sutherland trying
to climb out of an air-suit was just enough to show that there is no
way in the world they could've survived the G-force to exit the
atmosphere.
The movie would've been better had their escorts to the great beyond
been the Budweiser girls and the russian missle satellite been
Dr.Evil's Big Boy rocket.
gypsi
response 117 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 18 18:33 UTC 2000

"Coyote Ugly" was *supposed* to be eye candy, qui1.  =)  You wanted acting and
a plot?!?  Heh...
tpryan
response 118 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 18 23:05 UTC 2000

        There is a video/DVD called 'Earthlight' of pictures from orbit.
However, it is not easily available.  Would be great for people wowed by
the Space Cowboy views from orbit.
tod
response 119 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 18 23:43 UTC 2000

Or you can go to the IMax and see it in surround view.
jerryr
response 120 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 19 03:26 UTC 2000

it's available from several sources, in two different editions.  do a search
at http://www.dvdpricesearch.com
edina
response 121 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 22 17:44 UTC 2000

Or you can just flip on the NASA channel at night.
jerryr
response 122 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 27 00:22 UTC 2000

i saw "art of war" tonite.  not a bad popcorn muncher.  totally predictable
but i wasn't expecting shakespeare.
stacie
response 123 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 27 00:24 UTC 2000

 
 http://www.capalert.com/
 
 Make sure you check out the movie reviews! Hahahahahahahaha
 Scary Movie got 0 out of 100.
 
 This site is not a joke. :P
tod
response 124 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 27 01:48 UTC 2000

Scary Movie was hillarious. I'm not going to waste my time going to
that site.
morgan
response 125 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 27 02:01 UTC 2000

I thought it was pretty funny, and we had fun trying to see if we could
recognize all of the movies they parodied.
stacie
response 126 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 27 05:02 UTC 2000

 
 Hey Tod, that site is almost as funny as Scary Movie. hee hee  ;)
tod
response 127 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 27 19:30 UTC 2000

--
Thomas A. Carder
President
ChildCare Action Project: Christian Analysis of American Culture (CAP)
A 501(c)(3) nonprofit Christian Ministry
bdh3
response 128 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 30 08:51 UTC 2000

re#123 & 126:  Stacie, what exactly is it that you object to about a
site that 'reviews' movies from a conservative christian perspective
to point out issues for discussion that one might have?  Do you feel
the same way about Leiberman's views on 'Hollywood and the Movies'?
If not why not?  I'm sure there are advocacy sites that review media and
literature to advocate any number of views such as NAMBLA, bestiality,
incest, etc..  Why did you choose to ridicule that particular one?
I've read it a little, it seemed rather harmless.  Maybe I missed the
part where the site advocated vandalizing patrons of 'banned' movies
by throwing red paint on them or something like that....

There used to be something in this country called a 'first amendment'
that prohibited among other things the establishment of a 'state
religion'.  It has been apparently replaced at some point by one
requiring the establishment of a 'state religion' of 'atheism' or
'anti-religious' and prohibiting the expression of any organized
traditional faith unless it happens to be a nominal one but of a
highly vocal minority...the peyote church or the rastamans for example.
mooncat
response 129 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 30 13:06 UTC 2000

Recently saw "Art of War." I'd give it a B (rather generous).  The 
beginning was excellent, lots of promise offered that wasn't followed 
up on very well.  The martial arts scenes (as someone knowledgeable 
explained) were done accurately and the 'mistakes' made were realistic 
and logical.  The Hollywood people who took over the original 
screenplay messed with it to the point where it was hard to really care 
about any of the characters.  Wesley Snipes did very well though, as 
did the woman playing his Chinese sidekick.

Sadly, the main plot point just wasn't that well written in.  Fun 
action though, and some of the humorous lines were excellent.  The main 
FBI agent was a hell of a lot of fun and got a lot of the best lines.
mcnally
response 130 of 236: Mark Unseen   Aug 31 20:36 UTC 2000

  re #128:  I assume you're being intentionally obtuse, but the whole
  idea that you can't express a negative opinion on something without
  qualifying it with clarifications outlining everything else you
  happen to be opposed to is just silly.  The fact that Stacie doesn't
  mention NAMBLA, bestiality, or Senator Lieberman in her response
  should not encourage you to simply take your best guess at what her
  position might be and read that into her text.

  I'm also not sure how you got from "Stacie was amused by that movie
  review site" to "society wants to outlaw religion."  Again, I assume
  you're being intentionally illogical here, but as there are people
  who make such statements and seem to expect to be taken seriously, I'm
  not quite sure what to think..
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   81-105   106-130   131-155   156-180   181-205 
 206-230   231-236         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss