You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   76-100   101-115     
 
Author Message
15 new of 115 responses total.
mdw
response 101 of 115: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 04:34 UTC 2004

I voted "no".  I don't think grex needs to restore swiss cheese.
Additionally, although I think this is nitpicking, the procedure above
describing how the board & staff are supposed to implement this is
overly detailed.  The board would almost certainly apoint a "volunteer",
and might want to have the ability to pick 2 or more people for
different parts of this.  However, fixing this doesn't make this
particular resolution any more palatable to me so it's just a nit.
remmers
response 102 of 115: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 11:30 UTC 2004

No vote from me too.
salad
response 103 of 115: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 15:08 UTC 2004

AHAHAH YEAH< YOU REFUSE TO VOTE
cmcgee
response 104 of 115: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 16:14 UTC 2004

I was wavering, voted yes, then changed my vote to NO on this one.  I don't
think it actually solves any problem.
scott
response 105 of 115: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 16:54 UTC 2004

#5 of 10: by James Howard (jp2) on Sun, Mar  7, 2004 (19:29):
 I would assist if you voted for and supported my proposal.

remmers
response 106 of 115: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 17:10 UTC 2004

The members decided, nothing new has been offered in support.  Hence
an immediate revote is simply bad parliamentary procedure, regardless
of whether the rules allow it or not.  Thus my "no".
jp2
response 107 of 115: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 18:36 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

albaugh
response 108 of 115: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 19:37 UTC 2004

And it wouldn't have made any difference in the voting outcome, and it still
won't.
cmcgee
response 109 of 115: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 20:23 UTC 2004

Retract entry 4:  I change my vote on the new policy, not on the 2nd vote on
the same old issue.  I"ve never wavered about -not- restoring the items.
remmers
response 110 of 115: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 17:29 UTC 2004

Voting on this ended at midnight (EST) last night.  When I get an
up-to-date voter list from the treasurer, I'll count the ballots and
post the results.

I would have asked the treasurer earlier, but I forgot that the vote
was ending -- a side effect of my recently training the vote program
to shut off a vote automatically at the scheduled time, rather than
me having to do it manually.
remmers
response 111 of 115: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 12:48 UTC 2004

Results are as follows:  44 out of 77 eligible members voted.

    Yes:  4
    No:   40

The proposal is defeated.
rational
response 112 of 115: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 12:55 UTC 2004

Let's vote RIGHT this time, Grex.
salad
response 113 of 115: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 15:00 UTC 2004

C'mon guys, do it RIGHT
albaugh
response 114 of 115: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 18:46 UTC 2004

Even had all the other 33 eligible voters voted Yes, the proposal would still
have failed.  Time to put this to rest, once an for all.
jesuit
response 115 of 115: Mark Unseen   May 17 02:14 UTC 2006

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   76-100   101-115     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss