|
Grex > Oldcoop > #305: Nominations for Special Election to Fill Board Vacancies | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 19 new of 118 responses total. |
krj
|
|
response 100 of 118:
|
Feb 15 05:23 UTC 2006 |
My theory is that a twit is more likely to get elected to the
Grex board due to a lack of candidates, rather than a lack of
voters. So, perhaps to combat this threat, every Grex member should
be required to run in, say, every third board election.
(*coff*)
|
spooked
|
|
response 101 of 118:
|
Feb 15 11:21 UTC 2006 |
That would sure boost our membership =)
|
nharmon
|
|
response 102 of 118:
|
Feb 15 13:07 UTC 2006 |
I think its funny that we're so concerned about "twits" becoming board
members.
|
keesan
|
|
response 103 of 118:
|
Feb 15 17:42 UTC 2006 |
If they can nominate themselves and be seconded by one member, it could happen
some day. How about a rule by which anyone nominated by 10 members is forced
to run for the board? I nominate krj.
|
tod
|
|
response 104 of 118:
|
Feb 15 18:25 UTC 2006 |
re #100
That's not nice.
|
jadecat
|
|
response 105 of 118:
|
Feb 15 19:35 UTC 2006 |
re #103- I don't think that would work. How can you force someone to
serve on the Board?
|
nharmon
|
|
response 106 of 118:
|
Feb 15 19:49 UTC 2006 |
I wonder if forcing people to serve on the board violates any state
corporation laws.
|
marcvh
|
|
response 107 of 118:
|
Feb 15 21:14 UTC 2006 |
or possibly the 13th amendment.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 108 of 118:
|
Feb 15 21:17 UTC 2006 |
Huh?
|
keesan
|
|
response 109 of 118:
|
Feb 16 00:45 UTC 2006 |
That was a joke.
|
naftee
|
|
response 110 of 118:
|
Feb 16 02:31 UTC 2006 |
boy dat lol
|
janc
|
|
response 111 of 118:
|
Feb 16 13:47 UTC 2006 |
I think that if a person who many people thought was a twit was running
for the board then (a) other candidates would appear, and (b) more
people would take the trouble to vote. Richard seems to assume that
voter apathy would be uneffected by the kind of imaginary circumstances
that he thinks would cause it to be a problem.
Honestly, it's hard to image two less controversial board candidates
than John and I.
|
remmers
|
|
response 112 of 118:
|
Feb 16 20:29 UTC 2006 |
We could change that...
|
mcnally
|
|
response 113 of 118:
|
Feb 16 20:42 UTC 2006 |
Maybe we should auto-nominate the most twit-like person on Grex in
each future board election, ensuring that all elections are contested
by candidates who want to prevent the twit's election.
|
crimson
|
|
response 114 of 118:
|
Feb 16 21:18 UTC 2006 |
But what if one *won*?
|
davel
|
|
response 115 of 118:
|
Feb 16 21:20 UTC 2006 |
Maybe turnout would improve in the next election?
|
tod
|
|
response 116 of 118:
|
Feb 16 21:39 UTC 2006 |
re #114
Haven't they?
|
cross
|
|
response 117 of 118:
|
Feb 16 22:27 UTC 2006 |
I protest!
|
jesuit
|
|
response 118 of 118:
|
May 17 02:16 UTC 2006 |
TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
|