You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-118      
 
Author Message
19 new of 118 responses total.
krj
response 100 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 05:23 UTC 2006

My theory is that a twit is more likely to get elected to the 
Grex board due to a lack of candidates, rather than a lack of 
voters.  So, perhaps to combat this threat, every Grex member should
be required to run in, say, every third board election.
 
(*coff*)
spooked
response 101 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 11:21 UTC 2006

That would sure boost our membership =)
nharmon
response 102 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 13:07 UTC 2006

I think its funny that we're so concerned about "twits" becoming board
members.
keesan
response 103 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 17:42 UTC 2006

If they can nominate themselves and be seconded by one member, it could happen
some day.  How about a rule by which anyone nominated by 10 members is forced
to run for the board?  I nominate krj.
tod
response 104 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 18:25 UTC 2006

re #100
That's not nice.
jadecat
response 105 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 19:35 UTC 2006

re #103- I don't think that would work. How can you force someone to
serve on the Board?
nharmon
response 106 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 19:49 UTC 2006

I wonder if forcing people to serve on the board violates any state
corporation laws.
marcvh
response 107 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 21:14 UTC 2006

or possibly the 13th amendment.
nharmon
response 108 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 21:17 UTC 2006

Huh?
keesan
response 109 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 00:45 UTC 2006

That was a joke.
naftee
response 110 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 02:31 UTC 2006

boy dat lol
janc
response 111 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 13:47 UTC 2006

I think that if a person who many people thought was a twit was running
for the board then (a) other candidates would appear, and (b) more
people would take the trouble to vote.  Richard seems to assume that
voter apathy would be uneffected by the kind of imaginary circumstances
that he thinks would cause it to be a problem.

Honestly, it's hard to image two less controversial board candidates
than John and I.
remmers
response 112 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 20:29 UTC 2006

We could change that...
mcnally
response 113 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 20:42 UTC 2006

  Maybe we should auto-nominate the most twit-like person on Grex in
  each future board election, ensuring that all elections are contested
  by candidates who want to prevent the twit's election.
crimson
response 114 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 21:18 UTC 2006

But what if one *won*?
davel
response 115 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 21:20 UTC 2006

Maybe turnout would improve in the next election?
tod
response 116 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 21:39 UTC 2006

re #114
Haven't they?
cross
response 117 of 118: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 22:27 UTC 2006

I protest!
jesuit
response 118 of 118: Mark Unseen   May 17 02:16 UTC 2006

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-118      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss