You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-9   10-24         
 
Author Message
dpc
Notes of the Board Informational Meeting of February 18, 2005 Mark Unseen   Mar 2 15:46 UTC 2005

Attending Board Members:  slynne, mary, dpc, gelinas

Non-Attending Board Members:  bhoward, vanloons, polygon

Attending Non-Board Members:  STeve, aruba, remmers

The Board meeting was never called to order on February 18, 2005 
because of lack of a a quorum (5 members).  Bhoward had sent e-mail 
stating that he would not be able to attend.  We reached vanloons by 
phone.  He said he was moving out of his apartment that evening and 
could not attend.  He said he was moving to India March 1, and wants to 
connect after then by Yahoo video conferencing.  We were not able to 
reach polygon.

The "informational meeting" began at 7:15 p.m. at slynne's house, 208 
N. Grove, in Ypsilanti.  Dpc said he thought the only thing the Board 
could do under its rules was seek a quorum or adjourn.  Since we had 
sought a quorum and failed to achieve one, we must adjourn.  Others 
present said that it was Grex practice to hold an "informational 
meeting" at which matters could be discussed, but no decisions could be 
made.  Dpc, wanting to be a good sport, took notes.

The Board first discussed the question of subpoenas.  Generally, people 
thought we should have a policy on subpoenas.  Slynne said that until 
we had a policy, she would decide what would be done if we received 
another one.  Mary said she wants the Board and staff involved.

STeve said that that four times in Grex history the staff had had 
communications with law enforcement, and the information requested had 
been public.  Mary said we don't have the resources to fight a 
subpoena.  STeve said we should examine everything on a case by case 
basis.  For example, what if we received a request for information on 
people with Arabic-sounding names?

Dpc said that cost should not be a factor in contesting a subpoena.  He 
would provide legal services at no cost.  The motion fee used to be 
$20; it may have increased.  There would probably be just one court 
hearing.  Mary said what do users expect?  People have to expect we 
will give up information.  Maybe we should say something like "you were 
warned."  

Dpc said what if someone asked for his own privileged client-lawyer 
e-mail?  Or what if someone on Grex is involved in a divorce, and a 
subpoena arrives for all the e-mail between the user and the 
boyfriend/girlfriend?  Dpc said we need two things:  a policy to give 
users notice of what we will do, and a policy on how we will handle 
things internally.  He said would draft something, although it might be 
a while.

Treasurer's Report:
None.

Staff Report:
STeve reported that the hardware was stable.  There has been one crash 
caused by an Internet card.  

The Board congratulated everyone on the smooth move to Provide.Net - 
especially gelinas.  The DSL line at the Pumpkin has not been reliable 
and gelinas will disconnect it on Monday.

Schedule Next Meeting:
The Board members present thought that the next Board meeting could be 
held on Friday, March 18, at 7:00 p.m. at mary's.  However, since 3 
members were not available, this will have to be decided on line.

Moving Out of the Pumpkin:
We are moving out of the Pumpkin on February 26.  There was a l-o-n-g 
discussion about what would be going where, and who would be taking it 
there.

Since we moved out of the Pumpkin, some of our users no longer have 
local dialin service to Grex.  The Board considered putting a terminal 
server in somewhere, or installing another phone in Ann Arbor and 
paying for forwarding. 761-3000 no longer forwards.  Further discussion 
of this matter, and a poll, will be online.  STEve said that about 25 
people use the dialins.  Dpc expressed surprise that this was such a 
small number.  Aruba said that it was part of our charitable mission to 
provide access to the Internet, and that if we do not provide phone 
lines we are not providing a minimal connection to the Internet for 
people with limited means.  Apparently 4 people are being affected by 
the long-distance problem.

New Business:
Aruba reported that he had done the personal property tax return.

Dpc said that he had been getting at least 50 pieces of spam a day on 
his Grex e-mail account, and  suddenly there was an almost total lack 
of spam.  STeve said that it was not our doing.  He said that most spam 
is due to "zombie" machines, especially at universities, which have 
been taken over by spammers.  Whoever was spamming their machine had 
been knocked off; hence no spam.  STeve said that when we go to some 
form of Spam Assassin, Grex will box down, and we will need a second 
box.  Gelinas said that the University of Michigan is going with 
DeSpam.  Remmers said that a new version of exim is coming out, and it 
will have hooks for Spam Assassin.

STeve said that Grex is still as big as most medium-sized colleges in 
terms of what we do.  We are one of the larger OpenBSD systems in the 
world.

Dpc expressed his concern that in order to use Grex e-mail people still 
have to use telnet, which is obsolescent.  He pointed out that when he 
clicks on the "Telnet In" link on the home page, he gets a system 
message saying that telnet is not supported on the Mac for OS 9.2.  He 
said we should move to Web mail.  He said we should either install 
decent e-mail or not offer it at all.

The informational meeting adjourned at 8:40 p.m.
24 responses total.
keesan
response 1 of 24: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 16:20 UTC 2005

YOu can use ssh instead of telnet.  I HATE webmail - it is very slow and
inconvenient and wastes a lot of resources.  Could there be an 'ssh in' link
that works on Macs?   How obsolete is Mac OS 9.2?  Someone offered us several
copies of OS 10.  Dave, would you like a laptop set up to dial grex directly?

I would appreciate if the notes even for an informational meeting could be
posted within a few days of the meeting.  'We are moving Feb. 26' is rather
out of date on March 2.  

How come the last board meeting before this one chose a meeting date that was
not convenient for 3 of the members?  Would it be possible to pick a date on
which at least 6 members agree every time, in case of changes in plan?
tod
response 2 of 24: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 18:50 UTC 2005

 STeve said that that four times in Grex history the staff had had
 communications with law enforcement, and the information requested had
 been public.  Mary said we don't have the resources to fight a
 subpoena.  STeve said we should examine everything on a case by case
 basis.  For example, what if we received a request for information on
 people with Arabic-sounding names?
I don't even know where to start on this.  First, and foremost, "Were all four
subpoenas FROM law enforcement?"  Second: Does Grex have to "fight" a subpoena
if it is a ridiculous civil court request? Third: "Arabic-sounding names"???
What did STeve mean by that? I'm trying to assume he was implying Grex would
have the balls to discern against profiling of its users by prying eyes and
only comply to a subpoena of substance with solid requests by a judge rather
than for a civil situation that might not have any merit. Am I wrong here?
*slaps forehead*
mary
response 3 of 24: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 00:33 UTC 2005

Re: 1  All seven board members were at the January meeting when
the date for the Febuary meeting was set.  

keesan
response 4 of 24: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 00:35 UTC 2005

Is there any way board members could give notice a week in advance if they
cannot attend a scheduled meeting so that it can be rescheduled?
gelinas
response 5 of 24: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 01:47 UTC 2005

Yes, STeve was making an example of something that should be refused out of
hand.
other
response 6 of 24: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 06:40 UTC 2005

SBC has begun blocking port 25 on its DSL service.  That may partially
account for the spam reduction.  You can opt out of it post facto,
through their website.
mary
response 7 of 24: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 11:33 UTC 2005

Would STeve still advocate the request being "refused out of hand" 
if that request came shielded by the Patriots Act?

I think it's generous of Dave to offer to lend his legal expertise 
to help Grex with these documents.  I'd still like to see any final 
decisions be a group think among board and staff, if the law allows.  
Any policy we come up with should clearly state that if someone 
leaves information here we can't promise it will remain here.  Don't 
share or deposit anything on Grex that you need kept private.

We need to be truthful.  We can't promise to protect anything.
scholar
response 8 of 24: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 14:02 UTC 2005

dude, grexists, being paranoid mother fuckers, are all worried about the
patriot act this and the patriot act that, when really their proposed policy
of handing over private information BY DEFAULT to every dingbat two-bit lawyer
who's involved in a civil case and asks for it is just as bad.

being a social structure that isn't governmental (whatever real distinction
can be made between governmental and non-governmental social structures) does
not exempt you from caring about the safety and humanity of the people under
your control.
tod
response 9 of 24: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 16:49 UTC 2005

re #8
That's kind of harsh.
To be blunt, I think the BoD main priority on ANY non-profit starts with
fiduciary responsibility.  In other words, the executives of Cyberspace Inc
are elected to maintain the corporation's trust and confidence to it's
membership and to the general public in the case of a 501c3.

Can I propose a motion or at least compel the BoD to organize a "legal issues"
subcommittee?  And for the sake of not overstepping any boundaries, the
appointees NOT be attorneys but be willing to seek some pro-bono counsel
specifically for assistance in drafting a formal policy that protects the
membership and corporation while demonstrating respect for law enforcement?
 0-9   10-24         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss