I propose we make mcnally a fw

Aug 24 01:12 UTC 2007

I propose that we remove nharmon fw and instead get someone like either
mcnally or maus. I have no personal issues with nate. He has his good points.
However, when it comes to Unix and Programming, the guy is a complete and
total fucking moron.

response 2 of 26:

Aug 24 02:07 UTC 2007

Dan,

Unix and Programming implies that you will get responses from a person that
knows what they are talking about. Nate has no fucking clue. I'm just of the
opinion that nate isn't qualified for this forum. The only thing nharmon knows
how to do is shove some ethernet cable into a network switch. I just think
having nharmon as a fw is misleading to newbies coming onto here.

For example, we might have some sophmore CS major for Princeton come on here
and asks a fairly simple CS question. All of sudden, nharmon, who has never
taken a real CS class thinks he knows the answer so he responds. The newbie
thinks that this is correct because nhmaron is a fw, and hence knows what he
is talking about. After the newbie leaves, either mcnally or twenex points
out the fallacy in nharmons thinking. However, the damage has already been
done.

Dan, you don't think this is possible? A while back, nharmon tried to create
a chat line bot in Perl because he thought he knew what he was doing. At the
time I told him it wouldn't work because he needed to set up psuedo terminals
in order to make it work. He told me that he had been programming in Perl for
several years and that I had no clue what I was talking about. After me and
vive got a working bot, this faggot asked me why he couldn't get his bot to
work.

Nharmon couldn't get his shit to work because this idiot has never taken kind
of science class that requires rigorous thinking. However, he thought he knew
what he was talking about because he had written shit for work as opposed to
any kind of formal schooling. And that is what my issue is with nharmon. If
he has that kind of attitude with me, imagine what is has or told newbies.

There is a large fucking difference between knowing the material and
understanding the material. Nharmon just knows the material, but doesn't
understand the material because he lacks both the math and cs classes in order
to understand what is going on.

And nate, you know damn well I'm right. Before you shoot off your mouth, think
back to all those times you got your ass handed to you in the job interviews
you had. The questions these people were asking you was to make sure that you
understand what was going on as opposed to just thinking that you know what
is going on.

response 4 of 26:

Aug 24 04:54 UTC 2007

 You seem to be confusing being a "bits" conference freewitness with..
 well, I don't know what you're confusing it with, but there's no
 reason one needs to be an expert in the subject matter to which the
 conference is devoted.

response 6 of 26:

Aug 24 14:18 UTC 2007

But ... being the fair witness doesn't mean that you are an expert, just that
you are willing to do some of the administrative tasks for the conference.

response 8 of 26:

Aug 24 18:56 UTC 2007

..if not for the fact that I am completely uninterested.

response 10 of 26:

Aug 24 20:12 UTC 2007

Actually, aside from some of the heckling, I'd say that the quality of this
conference is already around the highest levels of those on Grex as a whole.

response 12 of 26:

Aug 25 01:03 UTC 2007

v1.5 will now how fully functional ascii porn support. This means when I nuke
someone, they will see pornographic images of nharmon and vivek going at it.

response 14 of 26:

Aug 25 01:31 UTC 2007

Bitch, get ready.

I know you don't understand the source code to v1.1 of my flooder. The code
to make ASCII porn over tel is far more exotic. Like in my previous versions,
I don't comment on my code. This version covers more areas of CS you never
have or ever will hear of.

response 16 of 26:

Aug 25 02:00 UTC 2007

resp:15 It goes without saying that these are NSFW for most workplaces

http://www.asciipr0n.com/pr0n/hunky/hunky02.txt
http://www.asciipr0n.com/pr0n/pinups/pinup02.txt

response 18 of 26:

Aug 25 02:04 UTC 2007

That whole webpage is great, silly fun, reminiscent of the mid-to-late
1980s to mid 1990s, when the average person could not access Internet,
and dialed into bulletin-boards for their low fidelity boobs/cock/phreak
stuff and stuff. 

response 20 of 26:

Aug 25 02:43 UTC 2007

Thanks, Chad, I'm good.  I'm pretty sure I'd be boring to cyber with, anyway.

response 22 of 26:

Aug 25 03:40 UTC 2007

nharmon, do society a favor and kill yourself. You're a worthless piece of
shit.

response 24 of 26:

Aug 25 14:57 UTC 2007

Regarding #22; http://youtube.com/watch?v=mVjO5LspGMs