|
|
| Author |
Message |
jep
|
|
two words, one match on Google
| 
Feb 28 16:19 UTC 2006 |
There's an Internet where you enter two words in Google which return
only one match. I entered an item on M-Net some months ago. Someone
turned out to be really good at finding two word combinations that
return one hit.
Like this one:
paczkis skyscraper
Results 1 - 1 of 1 for paczkis skyscraper. (0.32 seconds)
Try it, it is surprisingly difficult.
|
| 36 responses total. |
twenex
|
|
response 1 of 36:
|
Feb 28 16:22 UTC 2006 |
"An Internet"?
|
jep
|
|
response 2 of 36:
|
Feb 28 16:25 UTC 2006 |
Oops, "an Internet game".
|
other
|
|
response 3 of 36:
|
Feb 28 17:32 UTC 2006 |
That is what has come to be called a "meme."
|
nawcom
|
|
response 4 of 36:
|
Feb 28 17:37 UTC 2006 |
ok, well this has interesting word choice, (and no i was not browsing
for porn sites!)
I decided to start with the word "neopagan". I then just picked random
words that wouldn't match - a few i were close but then realized the
minimal results were caused by typos. then for some reason my twisted
goth brain came up with this - and it worked:
"neopagan dildonics"
no parenthesis or any shortcut.
... I have played this game before, unsuccessfully, so I am just
astounded for what i just found.
I need a beer.
-nawcom
|
nawcom
|
|
response 5 of 36:
|
Feb 28 18:47 UTC 2006 |
I just checked "neopagan dildonics" again on google and it just added an
index for some other site so im getting 2 results now!!!! DAMN YOU
GOOGLE!!! DAMN YOUUUU!!!!!!!!!
link: http://www.google.com/search?q=neopagan+dildonics
|
marcvh
|
|
response 6 of 36:
|
Feb 28 18:49 UTC 2006 |
Google isn't 100% deterministic, so it's not guaranteed that two searches
for the same thing will return exactly the same results.
|
sholmes
|
|
response 7 of 36:
|
Mar 1 01:52 UTC 2006 |
It's called "googlewhack". google googlewhack to know more !.
|
naftee
|
|
response 8 of 36:
|
Mar 1 04:22 UTC 2006 |
re 0
You could call her "kate sandler", and not just "someone".
|
tod
|
|
response 9 of 36:
|
Mar 1 13:44 UTC 2006 |
Or call her "Hey, you"
|
gull
|
|
response 10 of 36:
|
Mar 4 00:35 UTC 2006 |
The trick with these things is they only work until someone posts a
list of them on a website. ;)
|
albaugh
|
|
response 11 of 36:
|
Mar 9 21:30 UTC 2006 |
It would seem to be very difficult to "win" this game, based on a few trials.
|
jep
|
|
response 12 of 36:
|
Mar 9 21:30 UTC 2006 |
It can be done, though.
At least, it used to be possible. I *think* it still is!
|
jep
|
|
response 13 of 36:
|
Mar 9 21:41 UTC 2006 |
This took me about 20 tries, of different combinations of words:
Web Results 1 - 1 of 1 for marimbaist numismatically. (0.32 seconds)
|
rcurl
|
|
response 14 of 36:
|
Mar 9 22:57 UTC 2006 |
pentachlorocyclohexane ozonation (0.23 seconds)
It's pretty easy to crank these out. This took maybe a minute to find.
|
scholar
|
|
response 15 of 36:
|
Mar 9 23:04 UTC 2006 |
That doesn't at all indicate they're all easy to crank out, and as a man of
science, and especially of the statistical method, you should know that.
|
naftee
|
|
response 16 of 36:
|
Mar 9 23:32 UTC 2006 |
indeed.
i'm rather surprised that Dr. Curl would base his conclusion soley on a single
trial !
|
bru
|
|
response 17 of 36:
|
Mar 9 23:51 UTC 2006 |
first try "spinnaker fraggle"
|
rcurl
|
|
response 18 of 36:
|
Mar 10 02:14 UTC 2006 |
pentachlorocyclohexane L-selectin 0.33 s
pentachlorocyclohexane GDP-6-deoxy-D-talose 0.47 s
pentachlorocyclohexane monooxygenation 0.33 s
pentachlorocyclohexane muramylpeptides 0.43
If you want more, you'll have to pay me. It is simple to find these as
so much chemistry is the product of one person writing one paper.
As I said (and as a man of science, versed in statistics) such pairs are EASY
to crank out.
|
scholar
|
|
response 19 of 36:
|
Mar 10 03:56 UTC 2006 |
A man versed in denial.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 20 of 36:
|
Mar 10 06:28 UTC 2006 |
Speaking for yourself, it would seem. Do you talk to yourself a lot?
|
scholar
|
|
response 21 of 36:
|
Mar 10 07:20 UTC 2006 |
No, but I do talk to your mother a lot.
|
jep
|
|
response 22 of 36:
|
Mar 10 14:07 UTC 2006 |
Rane, you're supposed to come out with original words for both halves
of the pair. Once you've used "pentachlorocyclohexane" it becomes
ineligible for further usage.
Also, you might find it a little more challenging if you use words
outside of your professional specialty.
Finally, if you entered my word combination, it shows up only on a page
which is some sort of on-line dictionary or search-engine buster or
something. It's easy to go to that list and find more such
combinations. It's hard to think of word combinations on your own
without using that page. It can be done, though; I did it, yesterday.
Have fun!
|
scholar
|
|
response 23 of 36:
|
Mar 10 14:44 UTC 2006 |
AH HA.
Even the "Big 'Fagboy'" *jep* called you a faggot, (Prof.) Rane ("Or Shine")
Curl.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 24 of 36:
|
Mar 10 17:35 UTC 2006 |
Re #22: new rules?
What I'm saying is, the game is NOT particularly challenging. I could think
up some rules to make it harder too. For example, words of six letters only.
Is it against the rules to use *any* words from anything one knows anything
about? Please explain.
Re #21: in regard to talking to my mother - you are all wet.
|