You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-53        
 
Author Message
twenex
MoD scientist linked to BBC leak found dead Mark Unseen   Jul 19 00:04 UTC 2003

A scientist employed by the British MoD (Ministry of Defence) was found dead
this weak after having been suspected of leaking information to the BBC which
suggested the claims made by the Government that Iraq could launch WMD within
45 mins. were false:

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1001129,00.html

The Govt. of the UK has promised an "independent judicial inquiry".

This looks very bad.
53 responses total.
twenex
response 1 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 19 03:08 UTC 2003

Update: Apparently, preliminary reports indicated that he had committed
suicide. The Govt has in fact moved quickly this time (in marked contrast to
their attitude over suggestions there should be an independent inquiry into
the claims made on Iraq by Tony Blair and his Cabinet) and has already
appointed the judge who will be chairing the inquiry, which is expected to
report in September, as is the Foreign Office Committee of the House of
Commons, which has launched an investigation into the claims over WMD.
jmsaul
response 2 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 19 04:41 UTC 2003

According to the BBC, the guy was under a lot of stress, and looked terrible
when he testified before a Parliamentary committee.  He may well have done
himself in.
pvn
response 3 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 19 05:55 UTC 2003

Like Vince Foster, uh huh.
sabre
response 4 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 19 11:41 UTC 2003

He was killed to silence him. The American goverment does it all the time.
jmsaul
response 5 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 19 18:01 UTC 2003

Re #3:  Foster was a long-time clinical depressive, wasn't he?
sj2
response 6 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 19 18:30 UTC 2003

And the WMD saga continues ........ 
sj2
response 7 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 19 18:31 UTC 2003

Ahh!! The latest reports suggest that tha man slit his wrist!! 
C'mon .... I thought guys in the CIA and MI6 were smarter than that. ;)
jor
response 8 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 20 00:14 UTC 2003

        They sent Sandbagger 1

gull
response 9 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 20 19:33 UTC 2003

That's interesting, if true.  Slitting your wrist isn't a particularly 
quick or effective way to commit suicide, from what I've heard.  Most 
people who try it that way fail.
twenex
response 10 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 20 19:42 UTC 2003

Apparently he took co-proxamol (i believe that's the right spelling) - a
highly effective painkiller. must have sat there for ages, poor bastard.
sj2
response 11 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 20 19:55 UTC 2003

Though I still like the way BBC has been handling this. Not to say its 
not biased in its reporting but its still the best around.
janc
response 12 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 21 00:17 UTC 2003

If I were the kind of person into conspiracy theories, I'd say that since
slitting one's wrists is probably the number one most stereotypical way to
commit suicide, it would be a good choice if you wanted to commit a murder
that looked like suicide.
gull
response 13 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 21 01:19 UTC 2003

I dunno.  It'd be pretty tough to do to someone against their will 
unless you drugged them first, and that would come out in the autopsy.
janc
response 14 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 21 01:50 UTC 2003

Yeah, but if you are positing a really nefarious high-level government
conspiracy, you'd expect it to be cleverly done - not an easy kill, but
a cleverly concocted simulation of a suicide.  One shouldn't underestimate
the cleverness of those government spys when it comes to evading detection.
After all, look at Watergate or Contragate.  Hmmm.  On second thought, never
mind.  The average government conspiracy is about as subtle as elephant poop
in a wine glass.

Ah ... but maybe that's what they *want* us to think....
dcat
response 15 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 21 02:03 UTC 2003

resp:13 - he'd apparently taken some pretty potent painkillers beforehand.
polytarp
response 16 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 21 03:07 UTC 2003

Yes, he was drugged.
rcurl
response 17 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 21 06:42 UTC 2003

I just don't see that anything he had done or not done would drive a person
to suicide. I would suspect some other event in his life to be the root
cause. Suppose he did leak information contradicting the government's claims.
A significant fraction of the citizenry would applaud that. He might lose
his job (giving the government a further black eye), but he would get job
offers on the basis of his action. How could any outcome alone be a strong
motivation for suicide? Of course, he may have been mentally ill in some
fashion, which could tip the scales.
pvn
response 18 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 21 07:09 UTC 2003

Yep.  He was silenced.  Its all part of the cover-up.  You see, he was
actually killed on account of what he actually knew about the
Inslaw/Promis affair.  What?  You don't know about that one?  THEY are
doing an excellent job of covering that one up.
tod
response 19 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 21 16:45 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 20 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 21 16:51 UTC 2003

But...what stress? There was no need for him to feel any stress, as far
as the information published indicates. Was he being threatened with
anything? Nothing published indicates that. 
tod
response 21 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 21 17:05 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 22 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 21 17:30 UTC 2003

You mean, the Foreign Affairs Committee tortured him? I didn't read about
that. Otherwise, what is a "rough grilling"? You mean he committed suicide
because a committee asked him some questions? All he had to do was answer
their questions truthfully. Seems to me he could only *gain* credibility
as a whistle-blower. There had to be something else..."chercher la femme". 

tod
response 23 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 21 17:43 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 24 of 53: Mark Unseen   Jul 22 00:38 UTC 2003

That seems pretty far fetched. Do people get into a funk any more because
their family might be embarrassed? I thought that went out with horse
carriages. 
 0-24   25-49   50-53        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss