|
|
| Author |
Message |
pvn
|
|
_Hooters_
| 
Aug 2 08:36 UTC 2003 |
Through no fault of my own I happened to visit the local _Hooters_ for
lunch - maybe its just me but I think that definately folk don't go
there for the food.
What I was most interested in was the question of "nature" -vs Uh,
something like architecture but I'm not exactly sure of the exact word.
I'd heard about it and seen the billboards but had never been before.
Apparently it is known as "conference room H" where I am currently
deployed where one has to be listed on the "board" - actually a web
page- in case the pager and cellphone which we all are issued doesn't
work in case something happens. Anyways, I am taking bets, nature or
appliances not surgically implanted.
|
| 30 responses total. |
oval
|
|
response 1 of 30:
|
Aug 2 14:03 UTC 2003 |
uhh .. say wha??
|
other
|
|
response 2 of 30:
|
Aug 2 15:16 UTC 2003 |
Another post-liquid-lunch beady posting...
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 3 of 30:
|
Aug 2 15:38 UTC 2003 |
Good, I thought I was the only one who didn't understand that. Scary.
|
oval
|
|
response 4 of 30:
|
Aug 2 15:56 UTC 2003 |
i read 0 again. i dunno why surgically implanted tits are out of the bets,
but anyway since i'm not there to check out the boobies i cannot say. i've
never been to hooters. my grandparents used to go there a lot cuz they thought
they had great cheesburgers. i'm not sure they ever made the connection
between the name and waitresses.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 5 of 30:
|
Aug 4 04:56 UTC 2003 |
I take my boobies homegrown, thanks. Don't need to go to no hoochie
joint.
</alter ego rant off>
|
tod
|
|
response 6 of 30:
|
Aug 4 17:29 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
novomit
|
|
response 7 of 30:
|
Aug 4 17:44 UTC 2003 |
I beg to differ. I always had fish sandwiches when i went there.
|
tod
|
|
response 8 of 30:
|
Aug 4 17:53 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
lynne
|
|
response 9 of 30:
|
Aug 5 23:52 UTC 2003 |
I keep trying to talk other people into going to hooters and none of them
ever want to go because (they claim) the hamburgers are bad. Hmph. They
call themselves males...
|
flem
|
|
response 10 of 30:
|
Aug 6 15:06 UTC 2003 |
I'd go to hooters, but I'm not aware of one in the A2 area.
|
lynne
|
|
response 11 of 30:
|
Aug 6 15:07 UTC 2003 |
There's one up in Flint. We should go next time I'm in town. <hey, have
you even met Don yet?>
|
flem
|
|
response 12 of 30:
|
Aug 6 15:11 UTC 2003 |
yeah, like once or twice, I think.
|
lynne
|
|
response 13 of 30:
|
Aug 6 16:51 UTC 2003 |
really? I've hardly seen you the past year or so. anyway, he went to
undergrad up there--and besides, I want to see if he can keep a straight
face. :)
|
flem
|
|
response 14 of 30:
|
Aug 6 19:16 UTC 2003 |
Pretty sure, unless I'm somehow thinking of someone else. The time in
particular that I remember was going to teh go cart racing place in Detriot
somewhere, then to Dave and Buster's, I think.
|
lynne
|
|
response 15 of 30:
|
Aug 6 19:24 UTC 2003 |
Right! I'd completely forgotten about that--was just thinking "man, I
haven't seen greg in *ages*."
|
tod
|
|
response 16 of 30:
|
Aug 6 20:08 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
goose
|
|
response 17 of 30:
|
Aug 6 20:09 UTC 2003 |
There's a Hooters in Taylor, right near 75 I think. I've been there, the food
was alright.
|
erica
|
|
response 18 of 30:
|
Aug 11 09:13 UTC 2003 |
There is a hooters across from my work and the cooks at my place of work go
there and apply. Its a cheap thrill.
|
mvpel
|
|
response 19 of 30:
|
Aug 28 00:46 UTC 2003 |
Re: 6 - my impressoin from #0 wasn't that it was a silicone commentary, but
rather the modern cantelever systems in bras these days, that can make a
mountain out of a molehill, so to speak.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 20 of 30:
|
Aug 29 08:06 UTC 2003 |
cantelever systems? wha?
|
russ
|
|
response 21 of 30:
|
Aug 31 04:13 UTC 2003 |
Re #20: Pick up a copy of "A stress analysis of a strapless evening gown".
|
gelinas
|
|
response 22 of 30:
|
Sep 1 01:07 UTC 2003 |
Where!? I've wanted to read that book for 29 years!
|
russ
|
|
response 23 of 30:
|
Sep 1 16:01 UTC 2003 |
Re #22: AAPL had at least one copy until 1988, so you're just a
bit too slow. (I know who has it now.)
|
gelinas
|
|
response 24 of 30:
|
Sep 2 04:06 UTC 2003 |
The catalog reports no matches. Do you think the person who now has it would
lend it to me?
|