You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-72        
 
Author Message
polytarp
News from Illegally Occupied Palestine Mark Unseen   Jun 23 19:43 UTC 2003

This the item.
72 responses total.
oval
response 1 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 14:51 UTC 2003

 Last night the Associated Press posted on their national newswire a list of
73 "suicide bombing attacks," carefully and pointedly noting for each attack
the number of Israelis, if any, that were killed. (See list below.)

The Associated Press releases regular summaries of Palestinian attacks on
Israelis; for a previous example, see last month's "Chronology of suicide
attacks against Israel"
(http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2002/06/19/bombings-glance.htm).

However, we have yet to find a single AP summary detailing for the same time
period a history of Israeli attacks against Palestinians, with accountings
for each of the 1,768 Palestinian deaths. For that matter, we have yet to see
on the AP any of the following:

    * Overviews of the 148 Palestinians killed by Israel's illegal policy of
assassination of Palestinian political leaders;
    * Checklists describing the circumstances of the wounding of over 7,000
Palestinian children (this is UNICEF's estimate);
    * Dated flowcharts accounting for the 2,500 Palestinians permanently
disabled by Israeli attacks, 500 of them children;
    * Chronologies of Israeli attacks on Palestinian Emergency Medical
Personnel & Services, and Israeli Shelling of Palestinian Hospitals;
    * Timelines of the 15 on-duty Palestinian doctors and ambulance drivers
murdered by Israeli forces, and the 180 Red Cross Emergency Medical
Technicians attacked;
    * Checklists on the 64 Palestinians who have died due to Israeli
prevention of access to medical treatment;
    * Charts describing the 167 journalists attacked by the IDF;
    * Overviews of the roughly 15,000 Palestinians arbitrarily detained in
mass detentions over the last 2 months alone;
    * Timelines examining the Israeli shelling and demolition of over 1,600
Palestinian homes. *(all above stats from The Palestine Monitor)

Data for these categories is readily available from various sources, such as:

    * The Palestine Monitor
    * The Palestine Center for Human Rights
    * The Palestinian Crescent Society

http://www.pmwatch.org/pmw/cast/ap.asp

lk
response 2 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 23:03 UTC 2003

This item is an oxymoron: there has never been an independent state
called "Palestine" and ergo no part of it can be "occupied", let alone
"illegally".

Odd that while Oval criticizes one aspect of the AP's coverage of this
issue, she then engages in such shameless and onesided propaganda herself.

For example, Israel has not "assassinated" political leaders but rather
top leaders of illegal MILITANT groups who, under internatinal law, are
"terrorists".  By definition, this does not consitute "assassination"
nor is it illegal under international law.

In contrast, intentionally targeting and bombing civilians is illegal and
Human Rights Watch now categorizes this as a Crime against Humanity.
http://hrw.org/press/2002/11/isrl-pa1101.htm

The AP has often engaged in anti-Israel reporting. Yet oval is so one
sided that she's gone so far as saying that because she dislikes me
she will dislike all Jews. As if her PREJUDICE was on my head, and as
if this wasn't a reversal of causality.

So it comes as no surprise that whereas Oval is outraged that Israel will
at times preclude ambulances from a region, it is not surprising that she
fails to mention that this is because those ambulances refuse to allow
Israel to inspect them (as it is allowed to do under the Geneva Conventions).
Given that Red Crescent Ambulances have been caught transporting not just
weapons and bombs but also used as terrorist taxis, one can understand
Israel's concern. Either the ambulances Israel wished to inspect had
something to hide, or its crews figured that the propaganda value of allowing
someone to die and fault Israel outweighed the need to save the life.

(Lest anyone think this is far fetched, consider that the death of 12-year
old martyr poster-child Mohammed Al-Dura was possibly staged for this reason.
See Agora45 Item 146 or read about this here:
http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2003/06/fallows.htm

Also consider that Palestinian Arabs who suggested that school children
should not be bussed to violent demonstrations were called a "fifth column"
in official newspapers, a clear indication to keep silent if they didn't
want to be treated as "collaborators".)

As far as casualty analysis is concerned, oval seems not to care that more
Israeli women, girls and elderly have been intentionally murdered by Arab
terrorists than have been UNintentionally killed by the IDF's battle
against these terrorist murderers.  For a more complete analysis of
casualty figures, see:
http://www.ict.org.il/articles/articledet.cfm?articleid=439

Most devastatingly, oval seems more interested in demonizing Israel than
in ending the violence.  If we are to turn to "news", once again today we
have headlines that Hamas, IJ and other terrorist groups MIGHT agree to a
ceasefire in a few days.  Even the PA is so frustrated by this process that
it turned to the European Union to ask them to exert more pressure on Hamas.
polytarp
response 3 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 00:04 UTC 2003

Leer on, perhaps you don't understand history, but Palestine was a state as
much as any other place in the region.

Additionally, don't think we don't understand your anger towards oval; you
just hate women.
jazz
response 4 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 03:06 UTC 2003

        Despite the attempts of international law to cast anyone who operates
out of the informal concept of "civilized" warfare as a "terrorist" - a label
that surely would've been assigned to Sabbah's hashishins or American
revolutionary snipers had it existed at the time - there's really not much
difference between being shot by a uniformed soldier or being injured by
shrapnel from a bomber's package, to the injured party.

        The Israelis seem to have better control of where their rounds go, and
care considerably more about collateral damage, but they also have a great
deal more leeway to do so and still achieve their objectives.  But saying that
the elimination of a terrorist leader is different than the assassination of
a politician involved defence decisions or a officer in an army is really just
trying to use semantics to cast one side as without blame and the other as
composed entirely of it.
naftee
response 5 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 03:23 UTC 2003

Leeron is homosexual?
polytarp
response 6 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 04:15 UTC 2003

He's a total fag.
lk
response 7 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 06:29 UTC 2003

Who's going to Toronto for Pride.  Wanna do coffee?

John, you could also minimize the difference between someone getting
run-over in a car accident as being no different to the injured party
from being intentionally run-down with a car. Our value system (both
domestic and international law) does distinguish between inadvertant
deaths in war and the intentional murder of innocent civilians by terrorists.

Make no mistake about it. These terrorists INTENTIONS are to murder as
many innocent civilians as possible. They are the TARGET. On the flip
side, these civilians hide behind the civilian population, thus they
are the ones endagering those civilians. Israel does what it can to
prevent them harm, sometimes at great cost to its own forces (e.g.
sending soldiers into the death-trap of Jenin rather than bombarding
the terrorist strongholds with artillery or from the air).

I also think there is a huge difference between assassinating a
democratically elected civilian leader (e.g. JFK or the late Israeli
Minister of Tourism Ze'evi) and the pre-emptive killing of illegal
combatants who are engaged in the business of murdering innocents.

Phil, please enlighten me as to what you're being taught in history
class. When did a state of "Palestine" ever exist (other than as a
League of Nations Mandate following WW I and until 1948)? As a follow-up
homework assignment, when did Arabs last control the territory that is
now Israel proper?
polytarp
response 8 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 07:19 UTC 2003

Don't tell me what to do, punk.
bru
response 9 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 08:26 UTC 2003

ya leeron, you can't ask him to use his brain!  It might expand with dire
consequences.
sabre
response 10 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 13:29 UTC 2003

I am so sick of whining ass Palestinians. I remember them dancing in the
street on 9-11.I hope the jews kill everyone of those bastards. Perhaps they
should drink from the same cup the Jews did during  Hitler's rule.The Jews
have one tiny piece of land  right in the middle of nations that have vowed
her destruction.The arabs on the otherhand have vast amounts of space.
I hate Islam and the opression it stands for. It's a religion created by the
Devil himself to foster hate and destruction.Piss on "ALLAH" who is nothing
more than the arabic "moon god".I am sorry for being so bitter but this kind
of topic totally pisses me off. Muslims are the most despicable poeple on the
planet. If they had thier way the would force us all to obey thier devilish
theology. They would oppress all other religions for the sake of thier lies..
gull
response 11 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 13:38 UTC 2003

Re #4: The Israelis have better control, certainly, but they do seem to
feel Palastinian lives are cheap.  Otherwise they wouldn't have fired
multiple missile rounds from helicopters into a busy intersection in an
attempt to hit a single person.
oval
response 12 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 13:39 UTC 2003

bigot.

jazz
response 13 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 13:47 UTC 2003

        Is #10 serious at all?
oval
response 14 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 14:30 UTC 2003

i hope it's a joke, but it ain't funny.

lk
response 15 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 15:37 UTC 2003

As is the case in most wars, gull, one side thinks that the lives of many
of its civilians are more worthy than the POTENTIAL collateral damage of
the opponents. There is no moral equivalence here. The Geneva Conventions
allow attacking targets despite the possibility of some danger to the
civilian population. Yet the intentional targeting and bombing of
innocent civilians is murderous terrorism and a crime against humanity.

Poly, aside from the British Mandate in that name, when was there ever
an Arab state of "Palestine"?  When was the last time Arabs controlled
this land and what was their status?

I can't believe he doesn't know something so basic.
Can anyone help him?
tod
response 16 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 16:04 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

sabre
response 17 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 16:28 UTC 2003

yes it is a joke dark humor has it merits. It a way of venting frustration
at an on-going issue that will never be solved.Actually I'm tired of the
Israeli position also.The constant bickering between the two have become a
burden that the whole world must bear.You know the deal..first a suicide bombs
the Jews..then Jews bomb the Arabs whih causes another suicide attack which
then causes another reprisal form the Jews which then causes another sucide
attack(whew). The cycle seems to be unstoppable.I do however fault the Arabs
I never heard of a Jewish suicide bomber or a Jewish terrorist act.
I suppose an Arab bigot would claim that the Jewish reprisals are terror
attacks. They are are however reactions from a legit albeit frustarated
goverment.Oval you are the pot calling the kettle black. Your anti-semite
rambling and dripple proved 
your own bigotry
'."
sabre
response 18 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 16:29 UTC 2003

View hidden response.

jazz
response 19 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 16:36 UTC 2003

        Uhm, you have to be pretty good to succesfully post sarcasm or very
dry humor online. 
sabre
response 20 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 16:41 UTC 2003

"News from Illegally Occupied Palestine"
The occupied lands are a just compensation for several sneak attacks by
surrounding nations. I support full Israeli annexation of said lands.What IS
illegal are the constant terror attacks by deluded fananitics. Most
Americans have little sympathy for the palistinian cause.We watched them dance
in the streets and burn our flag when the twin towers fell.
sabre
response 21 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 16:53 UTC 2003

Perhaps I was too pessamistic
Hamas, Islamic Jihad OK Truce With Israel
see here for details:
http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/ISRAEL_PALESTINIANS?SITE=TNMEM&S
ECT
ION=US
polytarp
response 22 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 16:54 UTC 2003

Leer-on, I of course know the answers to those questions, but I also know
something you perhaps don't if you're not being honest with yourself:  You're
simply trying to waste time and tarnish my honourable reputation.
tod
response 23 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 16:54 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

tod
response 24 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 16:55 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

 0-24   25-49   50-72        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss