|
Grex > Agora46 > #108: CNN...A Network of Cover-ups and Lies. | |
|
| Author |
Message |
sabre
|
|
CNN...A Network of Cover-ups and Lies.
| 
Jul 23 22:55 UTC 2003 |
There may or may not be reasonable justification for CNN to withhold, for 12
years, first-hand information of torture and murder and terror in Iraq. But
where there can be no justification is in knowing, beyond doubt, of the
brutality of the Hussein regime while still continuing to report on Iraq as
if they possessed moral equivillency to the United States, for continually
undermining the American effort to save 25 million people from slavery. There
can be no forgiveness for that. CNN KNEW, and yet they still refused to report
based on what they knew.
CNN is finished.
Here's an e-mail from a Limbaugh listener that says it all:
For over a decade CNN has knowingly hidden the truth about Saddam for years.
People have been tortured and killed because CNN hid the truth in order to
keep an office open in Iraq. But why? They werent reporting the truth! Read
this news executives excuses. His hypocrisy is disgusting... Who's Responsible
For More Deaths, Bush or CNN?
I want to hear from you liberal cocksuckers on THIS one.
|
| 61 responses total. |
tod
|
|
response 1 of 61:
|
Jul 23 23:29 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
scott
|
|
response 2 of 61:
|
Jul 23 23:31 UTC 2003 |
What the problem? CNN was in it for the money, which is a perfectly
Republican motivation.
|
spectrum
|
|
response 3 of 61:
|
Jul 23 23:41 UTC 2003 |
Right scotty..I thought the motives of you liberals were more altruistic.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 4 of 61:
|
Jul 24 00:10 UTC 2003 |
I certainly read about Saddam's regime from the day he took power. It was
in many news media - including CNN. This is just baseless calumny (known
as lying).
|
scott
|
|
response 5 of 61:
|
Jul 24 01:57 UTC 2003 |
CNN is not run by liberals. Glad I coulcd clean up that bit of confusion from
#3...
|
pvn
|
|
response 6 of 61:
|
Jul 24 05:08 UTC 2003 |
re#5: I think it probably depends on where you are in the political
spectrum. OBviously there are those that view CNN as part of the "vast
right-wing conspiracy".
|
sj2
|
|
response 7 of 61:
|
Jul 24 05:24 UTC 2003 |
Old post. And they sell news, if you don't like it, don't buy it.
Simple.
|
pvn
|
|
response 8 of 61:
|
Jul 24 05:27 UTC 2003 |
Hear,hear.
|
sabre
|
|
response 9 of 61:
|
Jul 24 15:27 UTC 2003 |
RE#2
You don't see the problem? You jump on jazz's Bush bashing bandwagon because
you feel we were killing innocent people in Iraq. CNN covers up Saddam's
murders and with that you don't have a problem? This is the perfect example
of a liberal hypocrite. I guess any party that justifies your buttfucking is
ok.
RE#4
You stupid dipshit. You better do a little investigating before spouting off.
CNN admitted to covering up saddam's atrocities. What a stupid fuck you are.
RE#%
WHAT? CNN is the most liberal network in this nation. You people are fucking
STUPID.
" OBviously there are those that view CNN as part of the "vast
right-wing conspiracy"
Only an idiot would think that. Anybody with any savy at all kn ows that CNN
is run by a bunch of far-left liberals.
RE#7
I don't buy anything those bastards sell. I'm a fox news fan.
People need to be informed about the leftist liberal cover-ups before they
shoot thier mouth off at the Great President Bush however.
You losers piss and moan about the so called "republican cover-ups"
When it's one of your own you sweep it under the rug.
Well here it is...IN YOUR FACE.
Also. I POST WHATEVER I WANT. If you don't like it..FUCK YOU.
You don't have to read it.
You bastards are no match for me ...even if all you do all day is play with
your SPEAK-n-SPELL.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 10 of 61:
|
Jul 24 16:56 UTC 2003 |
(What a spectacle of a jerk making a fool of himself.)
|
flem
|
|
response 11 of 61:
|
Jul 24 17:32 UTC 2003 |
from #0:
> Here's an e-mail from a Limbaugh listener that says it all:
>
> For over a decade CNN has knowingly hidden the truth about
> Saddam for years.
Yep, that pretty much says it all. But in case that wasn't enough,
there's this:
> I'm a fox news fan.
Yeah, that clears it up.
|
sabre
|
|
response 12 of 61:
|
Jul 24 18:04 UTC 2003 |
RE#10
HaHa...I showed how stupid you are. Is that when I made a "spectacle" of
myself. You are one STUPID motherfucker. And tell us...How did you happen to
have access to onfo that CNN confessed to covering up?
RE#11
The fact that I have been labeled for my taste in news pretty much sums it
up to me. You are a liberal jackass. A grammer queen that obfusticates an
issue by directing the focus on minor typos. It's only because you lack the
intelligence to deal with the salient issue. I've heard your preaching before.
It lacks any real merit and therefore can be discarded as easy as you claim
mine can be.
THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAS THE POWER NOW..liberal scum
ON YOUR KNEES
|
rcurl
|
|
response 13 of 61:
|
Jul 24 18:08 UTC 2003 |
(What a jerk.)
|
sabre
|
|
response 14 of 61:
|
Jul 24 18:11 UTC 2003 |
BOW BEFORE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.
You closet queen. Yes rcurl is a wannabe girl.
Get ready for 4 more years of republican rule.
I may be a jerk...but you jerk off. It's the only way you can get sex.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 15 of 61:
|
Jul 24 18:21 UTC 2003 |
(Little does he know - very little.)
|
gull
|
|
response 16 of 61:
|
Jul 24 20:03 UTC 2003 |
Fox News = America's own version of Al-Jazeera.
|
flem
|
|
response 17 of 61:
|
Jul 24 21:06 UTC 2003 |
The problem is, sabre, that the form of what you post is so much more
interesting than the content that I can't help but prefer to respond to it.
I mean, really. If I wanted to talk about issues, do you think I'd involve
*you* in the discussion? :)
|
sabre
|
|
response 18 of 61:
|
Jul 25 14:07 UTC 2003 |
Of course you wouldn't involve me. I would rip your arguementa to shreads.
You would surround yourself with a horde of sycophants that agreed with your
every word. Your form isn't much better. Your posts lack any content at all.
You lack the ability to debate. Your rebuttals are all ad-hominenistic.
i can see that you are a total dumbass. You are probally a social reject that
depends on this "forum" for acceptance.
|
gull
|
|
response 19 of 61:
|
Jul 25 16:07 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 20 of 61:
|
Jul 25 16:57 UTC 2003 |
(While just a lot of noisy blather, #18 does show less signs of the
frequent jerkiness that eminates from sabre. Congratulations on the
improvement!)
|
flem
|
|
response 21 of 61:
|
Jul 25 18:45 UTC 2003 |
Sabre, do you do it on purpose, or is it merely a particularly amusing facet
of the universe's tendency toward irony that almost all your posts directed
to others would make more sense if you were talking about yourself instead?
Oh, and in case you weren't able to figure it out for yourself, the above
paragraph translates loosely to "I know you are but what am I?"
|
sabre
|
|
response 22 of 61:
|
Jul 25 19:01 UTC 2003 |
What are you..you ask?
You are a confused liberal.buttfucking,cocksucking,shiteating,asslicking
fool that can't think his way out of a special education class. You are
afflicted with down's syndrome. You are an UGLY little dweeb that can't get
laid. You are about as humorous as a pay toilet in a dysentary ward.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 23 of 61:
|
Jul 25 19:28 UTC 2003 |
(Well, a jerk stays a jerk, I guess.)
|
flem
|
|
response 24 of 61:
|
Jul 25 19:50 UTC 2003 |
I once had occasion to read some things written by Sigmund Freud. I remember
thinking, as I read, that it was amazing that he had the balls to state as
simple facts things that he was quite clearly making up as he went along.
Not just things without any evidence, but things for which it was radiantly
clear that he had not even bothered to attempt to look for evidence.
For some reason, you remind me of that, sabre. :)
|