You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-79       
 
Author Message
mijk
What happened to Grex's Gopher server? Mark Unseen   Apr 4 12:44 UTC 2017


I have been told, Grex had an awesome Gopher server at one time. What happened
to it? I see there is a Gopher client, and it points to quux.org ( think?)
rather than alot pointing to floodgap's gopherhole. It would be nice to have
a Gopher server here, maybe like SDF offering gohper hosting? Een better
though, imo - would be a shared gopher server. A collaborative gopherhole.
Is anybody still interested in gopher here? What do you think of a grex
gopher server? 

79 responses total.
tonster
response 1 of 79: Mark Unseen   Apr 4 14:08 UTC 2017

I see it as one more thing we don't have time to administer myself, and
I'd question if we could even build it at this point, considering the
overall state of the system.
mijk
response 2 of 79: Mark Unseen   Apr 4 15:37 UTC 2017

Hi tonster,
There seem to be two questions now:
How difficult would it be to administer a gopher server here on grex?
What is the overall state of the system?
tod
response 3 of 79: Mark Unseen   Apr 5 03:18 UTC 2017

I gave up gopher holes.
cross
response 4 of 79: Mark Unseen   Apr 5 14:31 UTC 2017

The overall state of the system is bad, frankly. We're many
years behind on upgrading the basic OS and frankly we want
to move to FreeBSD anyway.

But I'm not sure what the appeal of a gopher server would be?
Aside from a certain "retro" thing, Gopher's pretty much gone
by the wayside....
tod
response 5 of 79: Mark Unseen   Apr 5 15:59 UTC 2017

I'd be more interested in a usenet newsreader like back in tha day
kentn
response 6 of 79: Mark Unseen   Apr 6 00:38 UTC 2017

  /usr/local/bin/slrn
papa
response 7 of 79: Mark Unseen   Apr 6 09:27 UTC 2017

There is a community of Gopher fans keeping the protocol alive, though it is
admittedly a very small niche. In addition to its retro appeal, Gopher allows
very lightweight clients and servers and appeals to people who think the WWW
was spoiled by embedded graphics. It also serves as a darknet for sharing
files off the Web.
mijk
response 8 of 79: Mark Unseen   Apr 6 18:17 UTC 2017

Gopher does have much going for it, if people knew about it. It concentrates
your mind on the material you are reading, or searched for; instead of the
fluff, which is alot of hip web design. The web is as much about what it looks
like as what it is; where really content 'should' be king. 
I think having another option, other than WWW, for hypertext content on the
internet is a good thing. I can see how the web killed gopher, but i really
think many people are tired of the web when it comes to certain types of
material. Look at me: someone who switched on a computer fro the first time
in 2007 ( i think?), and here i am beating the path less trod (these days).
I am eternally grateful nobody showed me how to use the PC i bought when i
got internet and had to get aquanted with computers; otherwise i would maybe
be stuck in a Micros*ft controlled matrix, where venturing off any well trod
paths is punishable by excommunication.
Anyway: one nice thing would, along with a webpage, to have a gopher page,
and or, a gopher blog. :) 
I'm not asking directly for this right now; just thought it a nice idea to
have the topic broached, and wondered how feasable it was for the future.
Gopher hasn't died, it really is still here. (when i get round to setting up
my own gopher server, it would be nice if it could be listed on Grex.org's
much better gopher hub ;) 
kentn
response 9 of 79: Mark Unseen   Apr 7 00:25 UTC 2017

See if you can run it now.  I don't know if it will connect to anything
or.
kentn
response 10 of 79: Mark Unseen   Apr 7 00:26 UTC 2017

not :)
nydel
response 11 of 79: Mark Unseen   Apr 20 16:16 UTC 2017

i would use a gopherspace here on grex. i'm a big fan and currently am trying
to leave w3/html behind. this includes of course replacing my http home with
a script that simply formats my gopherspace & phlog to the most minimal
hypertext possible. anyway i think the number of us interested in doing such
a thing is growing, especially as the w3c's concern for user rights is
shrinking. see http://gopher.floodgap.com/gopher/gw for great example of
how gopher can be visible to w3 users ... i recommend gopher://sdf.org as
a test uri to enter. i think the demand for a non-commercial(izable) protocol
is going to increase as even non-savvy end-users notice their freedoms
dwindling on the w3 specs to come. some speak of potential secure gopher, other
such oddities ... i argue that gopher is perfect as is, and any modifications
that need to be done can be done through the way it's retrieved via w3 (the
protocol that won, for now anyway, it has won and that is that). in the unix
philosophy sense, i speak. gopher is perfect. it does exactly what it is
supposed to do, and no more and no less. i'll note that i'm more interested in
maintaining and cultivating the user base here at grex than i am in
implementing a new protocol instance, but should sensible priorities permit, i
would certainly make very serious use of a grex gopherspace.
mijk
response 12 of 79: Mark Unseen   Apr 21 18:33 UTC 2017

I have spoken with a few members of Grex.org who are very into gopher. SO ther
is a group of us who might be able to contribute in some way to this. 
mijk
response 13 of 79: Mark Unseen   Apr 21 18:54 UTC 2017

Another reason to recommend gopher, is it looks georgous on mobile devices.
Have you seen the overbite client on android (aswell as firefox)?
http://gopher.floodgap.com/overbite/sc?android   
It looks even better - for real - on my smartphone (which only has a small
screen compared to most peoples). It is a dream to navigate, and on mobile
devices - i think you see the limitiations of the WWW design fashions we have
all been aquainted with. 
cross
response 14 of 79: Mark Unseen   May 18 19:27 UTC 2017

I guess I still don't quite see the appeal. I get that folks don't want to
get bogged down in the fluff of modern web "design", but that doesn't mean
that one has to author HTML that's all fluffy, or that one has to consume
web-based content with a graphical web browser. One could use `links`, or
`lynx`, or `w3m` or any number of text-only browsers to avoid most of the
garbage.

I mean, I don't have an objection to running a gopher server, but I still
don't understand the point. Most of the objections could be addressed through
other means.
papa
response 15 of 79: Mark Unseen   May 18 23:50 UTC 2017

The point is the same as the point in using a shell-based bulletin board
system when there is a web-based interface available.

As you mentioned in your post on SDF's BBOARD, a gopher server on Grex,
especially on with per-user gopherspace available, would be a feature that
would attract some new users to Grex, even if it's interesting to only a
minority of the user base.
cross
response 16 of 79: Mark Unseen   May 19 00:28 UTC 2017

Sure. The part I'm still struggling to understand is that the stated
reasons for wanting gopher (text, no ads, etc) aren't specific to
the gopher *protocol*, in the same way that a text-based BBS is
specific to using a text-based BBS. One can use a text-based browser
and get the same effect.  Grex's whole reason for existence was a
text-based BBS; the desire for gopher seems limited and mostly boils
down to, "it's not HTTP."

That said, I installed a gopher server package. I guess I'll have
to see about configuring it and getting it running.
papa
response 17 of 79: Mark Unseen   May 19 09:25 UTC 2017

I understand your point. I don't think people are interested in gopher because
it does anything that can't be achieved in HTTP by sticking to a spartan page
design aesthetic, but the freedom (from dreaded HTML) and simplicity in
publishing content with gopher. You can post your plain text documents as-is,
and a menu is little more than a list of file names an titles.

With gopher you don't have the option of getting fancy/complicated.

There is also a factor of nostalgia/curiosity for a road-not-taken in the
history of computing. A few different decisions in the early 1990s and we
might all be now using the World-Wide Gopherspace instead of the WWW.
cunnings
response 18 of 79: Mark Unseen   May 20 14:39 UTC 2017

I'm a fan. Check out my gopher at gopher://whitemesa.net for live space
weather reports and other stuff.
cross
response 19 of 79: Mark Unseen   May 24 14:50 UTC 2017

*shrug*

Okay, I guess it doesn't hurt anything. There's a gopher server running
on Grex now.
tod
response 20 of 79: Mark Unseen   May 25 00:17 UTC 2017

I cant get Veronica working on Archie..I feel like a Jughead
papa
response 21 of 79: Mark Unseen   May 26 11:19 UTC 2017

Veronica will only work on Archie if she thinks Betty is going to steal him
away from her.
tod
response 22 of 79: Mark Unseen   May 26 18:46 UTC 2017

Zoinks
mijk
response 23 of 79: Mark Unseen   May 28 18:42 UTC 2017

excuse my ignorance, but how do we access the gopher server? I fire up the
gopher client and i get 'The gopher Project' server as the home server. How
do we go about adding content to the grex server? :)
papa
response 24 of 79: Mark Unseen   May 29 00:34 UTC 2017

I've written a quick-and-dirty introduction to Gopher for grexers:
 
~papa/public_gopher/README.1st
 
That should get you started. Feedback on the document is welcome.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-79       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss