You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-17   18-42   43-52        
 
Author Message
jp2
Membership Initiative Mark Unseen   Dec 16 11:10 UTC 2003

This item has been erased.

52 responses total.
albaugh
response 1 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 16 18:19 UTC 2003

Did you ever see "The Blues Brothers"?  (movie)
carson
response 2 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 14:11 UTC 2003

(could we get a refresher on why there is a verification policy and
on the arguments against having such a thing?)

(as I understand this initiative, it would replace the current policy
with a policy of accepting addresses as identification without 
verification.  does this mean physical addresses or does it include 
other addresses, such as e-mail addresses?  if it does include e-mail
addresses, would a Grex e-mail suffice?  wouldn't that be redundant?)
gull
response 3 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 14:18 UTC 2003

And should we accept addresses that are obviously fake?  Who determines
what is "obviously fake"?
gelinas
response 4 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 14:24 UTC 2003

As I understand it, the basic reason for the verification policy is so that
we can identify the person or persons who use grex as a base of operations
for attacks on other systems.

I do not think the current system needs changing.
albaugh
response 5 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 15:24 UTC 2003

Nor do I.  Recall that in The Blues Brothers movie Jake (or was it Elwood?
;-) gave as his address for his drivers license Wrigley Field.
aruba
response 6 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 16:08 UTC 2003

I think the major effect that the ID policy has is to discourage some people
from becoming members.  I don't know how big that pool is, but I am pretty
certain that among the pool are almost all the people who would abuse the
privileges that members get.

When Grex accepted credit cards back in 2000, there were a number of times
when credit cards were charged back because they were stolen.  That has
happened only once in the 3 years since we dumped direct credit card
processing and started using Paypal.  My conclusion is that there are people
out there who would like to buy memberships and use them for illicit
purposes, and we have an interest and a responsibility to try to prevent
them from doing so.

Now, this is a tradeoff, because I'm sure we discourage some legitimate
donors with our ID policy.  I'm fairly certain, though, that we also save
ourselves a lot of headaches.

I can think of a couple things we could do short of abolishing the
collection of ID altogether.  One is to accept a Paypal "verified address"
as valid ID.  I have never gone through the process to get a verified
account with Paypal, so I don't know exactly what's involved; perhaps
someone who has done it could tell us.  All I found was this page:
/----------------------------------------------------------------------\
| https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=p/gen/verification-outside |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
which says you need to prove you have a checking account (if you're in the
US) or a credit card (if you're outside the US).

Another thing we could do is do more to encourage people who don't want to
send ID to send donations anyway.  They wouldn't become members, but they
would be supporting the system.  Right now we have a page about that:
/------------------------------------------------\
| http://www.cyberspace.org/grexmart/donate.html |
\------------------------------------------------/
but there's not much to it.  We could promote this option a lot more.

It's true that the net has changed a lot since the ID policy was adopted,
and people are much more wary about giving out ID (I know I am).  So I
wouldn't be at all surprised to learn that this holds some people back
from becoming members.

I would caution everyone, though, not to assume that removing the ID
policy will result in everyone who doesn't like it becoming members.  A
while back a number of people complained that they couldn't be bothered to
write a check to Grex, and why didn't Grex accept credit cards?  But when
we did start accepting credit cards, many of them found a different
excuse, and never did become members.
gull
response 7 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 16:15 UTC 2003

If you link your bank account to PayPal, the confirmation process is
pretty simple: They make two small (between $0.01 and $0.99) deposits to
your account.  When you get your bank statement, you go to PayPal's site
and enter the amounts of those deposits.  If the amounts match, PayPal
takes this as evidence that the account is yours and the mailing address
associated with the account is correct.
jp2
response 8 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 16:32 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

flem
response 9 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 16:40 UTC 2003

*cough*FUD*cough*
other
response 10 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 16:45 UTC 2003

I hope those whose expressed doubt about my feelings with regard to 
jp2's benevolent interest in Grex are reading this...
jep
response 11 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 17:59 UTC 2003

I now send my membership contribution, and and any donations I make to 
Grex, via Paypal.  I would probably be a member even if I had to mail a 
check, but would be slower about sending the money.  I'm more likely to 
donate now than I used to be.

If there was a "no ID required, non-voting membership" link on the WWW 
page, right next to the current link to contribute for a membership, 
I'll bet some people would use it.

BTW: if there were other options on that page, such as "membership + 
$10",  I would have used one earlier this week when I renewed my 
membership.  I know using Paypal costs Grex some money, and I would 
have happily contributed a bit extra to cover that cost.  Instead, the 
membership amount of $60 was hard-coded into the link.  I didn't have 
the option to add extra money.  I'd have to go back and make another 
contribution to send any additional money.  I'd like to suggest 
membership +$10, $25, $50, and $100 options be added.
remmers
response 12 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 18:22 UTC 2003

The problem with a "no ID required, non-voting membership" option is
that it ignores the other reason we require ID.

I think that a "no-ID-required contribution" option that carried no
privileges would be reasonable.  It might bring in some additional
income, although I don't know how much.
micklpkl
response 13 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 18:45 UTC 2003

Personally, I have sent extra money to cover the Paypal fees that are charged
to Grex. IIRC, you can send any amount you like via Paypal, though evidently
jep in resp:11 must've used an some URL that I'm not aware of.
aruba
response 14 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 18:52 UTC 2003

I think both John and Mickey are correct - you *can* send any amount via
paypal, via http://www.cyberspace.org/grexmart/donate.html.  But the link
at http://www.cyberspace.org/member.html doesn't allow you to change the
amount.

I agree we could do a better job with the links.  I think John's ideas are
good ones.
jp2
response 15 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 19:50 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

aruba
response 16 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 20:12 UTC 2003

Oh for Christ sake, Jamie, no personal information was ever available
online and you know it.  You're referring to the fact that I have data on
my machine, and my machine is sometimes connected to the internet.  That
doesn't mean that the data is available over the net!  I'll bet your bank
has numerous computers which are both on the internet and capable of
accessing your banking records.  Does that mean your bank is
irresponsible?  Why don't you go stand in front of it and hand out fliers
complaining that they've lied in their disclosure statements.  Let us know
what happens.
jp2
response 17 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 17 20:57 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

 0-17   18-42   43-52        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss