You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-10   11-35   36-60   61-85   86-110   111-135   136-160   161-185   186-210 
 211-235   236-260   261-285   286-310   311-331      
 
Author Message
klg
Kludge Report Part C -- Die, You Little Black Babies Mark Unseen   Feb 24 12:09 UTC 2006

Pro-abortion forces in the US must be pleased with the following report 
(targeting black immigrants).  (Say, doesn't the Netherlands also 
support euthanasia??  Do you think it's just a coincidence?  Yeah, 
probably.)


Mandatory abortion proposed in Holland:  Official calls for debate to 
deal with issue of unwanted children

Posted: February 21, 2006, WorldNetDaily.com

 A health official in the Netherlands has called for a debate on the 
idea of forced abortion and contraception to deal with what she sees as 
a crisis of unwanted children.  Alderman Marianne van den Anker of the 
Leefbaar Rotterdam Party wants specifically to target communities of 
Antilleans and Arubans where she sees the biggest problems of unwanted 
children. . .

 The target groups for her program are Antillean teenage mothers; drug 
addicts and people with mental handicaps . . . Van den Anker said 
children from these groups run an  unacceptable risk  of growing up 
without love and with  violence, neglect, mistreatment and sexual 
abuse.  
331 responses total.
johnnie
response 1 of 331: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 12:42 UTC 2006

Geez, "klg"--don't tell me you've run out of half-wit fourth-rate
American politicians to hold up as objects of ridicule of all things
Lefty.  Points, though, for going with the Netherlands rather than the
more obvious, say, France or Russia.
richard
response 2 of 331: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 15:21 UTC 2006

they do that in china, where because of overpopulation you aren't legally
allowed to have more than two children per family.
marcvh
response 3 of 331: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 15:33 UTC 2006

I'm sure that pro-abortion forces in the US would be pleased with this
if they existed.  Pro-choice forces, on the other hand, feel otherwise.
jadecat
response 4 of 331: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 15:47 UTC 2006

As much as all the pro-life would like to think so, pro-choice does NOT
equal pro-abortion.
tod
response 5 of 331: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 16:28 UTC 2006

re #0
"Die, You Little Black Babies"
LMAO! Crass but funny!
johnnie
response 6 of 331: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 16:33 UTC 2006

The nitwit in #0 (I mean the politician, not "klg") isn't promoting
abortion per se, anyway; she's arguing for eugenics, which is a whole
other controversy.
nharmon
response 7 of 331: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 16:36 UTC 2006

In all fairness, pro-abortion as used by most of us means pro-abortion-
rights. Its like pro-gun-rights being shortened to pro-gun. Being pro-
gun doesn't mean we want to force everybody to own a gun. Capice?
jadecat
response 8 of 331: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 16:48 UTC 2006

No, pro-choice is already a term in use that better describes the
position- which is vastly different than pro-abortion. I'm
anti-abortion, but pro-choice. I think woman have the right to have a
choice in whether they continue a pregenancy or not. If that choice is
TO continue I support that too.
tod
response 9 of 331: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 16:59 UTC 2006

No, klg was right on target describing me.  I'm pro-abortion.  I think
abortions should be a contact sport held in Winter Olympics.  Half those guys
you see as oil execs probably caused several on their golf outing trysts. 
Heck, GW Bush even caused one.
johnnie
response 10 of 331: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 17:04 UTC 2006

It should be noted, too, that many anti-abortion types don't like being
called "anti-abortion"; they prefer "pro-life".  
 0-10   11-35   36-60   61-85   86-110   111-135   136-160   161-185   186-210 
 211-235   236-260   261-285   286-310   311-331      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss