|
Grex > Agora46 > #105: Uday and Qusay dead; victims of a family dispute over money? | |
|
| Author |
Message |
russ
|
|
Uday and Qusay dead; victims of a family dispute over money?
|
Jul 22 21:25 UTC 2003 |
NPR has been reporting this afternoon that Uday and Qusay Hussein,
the eldest sons of Saddam Hussein, are confirmed dead after a
3-hour firefight in the Iraqi city of Mosul.
The house in which they were killed is said to be owned by a tribal
leader who is also a cousin of Saddam; the owner was reported to
have been seen talking with US soldiers after the battle, leading
to suspicion that he turned in the two for the $15 million/head
reward.
|
| 122 responses total. |
tod
|
|
response 1 of 122:
|
Jul 22 21:37 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
twenex
|
|
response 2 of 122:
|
Jul 22 21:59 UTC 2003 |
Let that be a lesson to Muslim clerics who think capitalism is Anti-Islamic.
Hopefully this'll shut up all those ingrates who think they can have democracy
and home rule in a day; don't they realise if it was that easy they'd have
brought it in as soon as they gained independence from the UK?
|
other
|
|
response 3 of 122:
|
Jul 22 22:09 UTC 2003 |
What the FUCK are we doing giving away $30 million dollars to some
schmuck backstabber just for letting us kill his cousins for him?
|
scott
|
|
response 4 of 122:
|
Jul 22 22:16 UTC 2003 |
Don't worry, there's plenty of money in the budget thanks to Bush's excellent
fiscal policies.
</SARCASM>
|
tod
|
|
response 5 of 122:
|
Jul 22 22:52 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
bru
|
|
response 6 of 122:
|
Jul 23 00:13 UTC 2003 |
nad it was a 6 hout firefight...
|
jor
|
|
response 7 of 122:
|
Jul 23 00:47 UTC 2003 |
200 against 4
|
jep
|
|
response 8 of 122:
|
Jul 23 02:24 UTC 2003 |
re resp:3: Given that we're not packing up and leaving Iraq to be re-
taken over by Baathists led by Saddam and/or his family... you'd have
rather used another method of digging out these people, such as maybe
occupation for another 10 years?
While I have a lot more misgivings over the invasion of Iraq than I
did at the start of the war, I'd still say that
1) The Hussein sons were part of the problem we invaded Iraq to solve;
2) While they lived, they were very likely to be a continuing problem;
3) It was a whole lot cheaper to get someone to sell them out than to
find and arrest and/or kill them
4) Even so, I bet $15 or $30 million in reward money was a drop in the
bucket of the money we spent in trying to find these people.
We're spending a few billion per month or thereabouts in fighting in
Iraq, as well as more American soldiers' lives every day. This was
not a big expense. It was probably money pretty well spent.
|
lk
|
|
response 9 of 122:
|
Jul 23 05:44 UTC 2003 |
Yes, but in the bazaar westerners frequently overpay and walk away
thinking they got the deal of the century.
I suspect that a $3 million reward would have been just as effective.
(What's that in worthless Iraqi currency?)
|
janc
|
|
response 10 of 122:
|
Jul 23 06:06 UTC 2003 |
Irrelevant. The rewards had to sound big to Americans, because they need to
convince Americans that Bush is tough on Sadam.
|