|
|
| Author |
Message |
mdw
|
|
A zero-line item
| 
Sep 28 10:34 UTC 1984 |
|
| 44 responses total. |
mdw
|
|
response 1 of 44:
|
Sep 28 10:34 UTC 1984 |
and some responses to force nsep
|
mdw
|
|
response 2 of 44:
|
Oct 29 14:16 UTC 1984 |
And a 3red unfortunatley NOT NEW RESPONSE.
|
mdw
|
|
response 3 of 44:
|
Oct 29 14:16 UTC 1984 |
and a NEW response.!
|
tnt
|
|
response 4 of 44:
|
Jul 19 05:20 UTC 1991 |
Hurray!
|
lee
|
|
response 5 of 44:
|
Apr 20 22:53 UTC 1997 |
and another new response!
|
remmers
|
|
response 6 of 44:
|
Apr 21 15:42 UTC 1997 |
A response gap of almost 6 years between #4 and #5! Is this a
record? It's almost as large a gap as it's possible to have on
Grex at this time.
|
lee
|
|
response 7 of 44:
|
Apr 21 23:11 UTC 1997 |
Aww, man, if I'd seen the date, I'd have waited until it was exactly
six years to respond! Oh well. Close enough.
What is the largest possible gap to have on grex? And I thought
the 1984 dates looked odd... didn't someone once say it was a time
warp or something?
|
remmers
|
|
response 8 of 44:
|
Apr 22 03:53 UTC 1997 |
Well hmm, when did Grex first go on line for staff testing and
configuration? It was a few weeks before it opened to the
public. Sometime in June 1991 I think.
|
valerie
|
|
response 9 of 44:
|
Apr 22 13:32 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
valerie
|
|
response 10 of 44:
|
Apr 22 13:34 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
valerie
|
|
response 11 of 44:
|
Apr 22 13:35 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 12 of 44:
|
Apr 22 16:40 UTC 1997 |
No discussions here are regularly scheduled. They are all
irregular.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 13 of 44:
|
Apr 22 22:30 UTC 1997 |
I thought the '84 dates were a glitch...
,what's wrong with stray commas?
,why shouldn't they work?
|
valerie
|
|
response 14 of 44:
|
Apr 23 04:10 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 15 of 44:
|
Apr 23 11:15 UTC 1997 |
Aha.
|
lee
|
|
response 16 of 44:
|
Apr 23 22:46 UTC 1997 |
Backtalk is your friend :)
I'm actually on today from regular telnet (gasp, I got on)
What was this item about again?
Who wants to explain the 1984 dates? I think I read something on them before
but I've forgotten since...
|
remmers
|
|
response 17 of 44:
|
Apr 24 12:42 UTC 1997 |
If you do an 'only 0' to look at the item text, you will see
that this item is about nothing at all. The honesty is
refreshing. Most items that are about nothing at all pretend to
be about something.
|
lee
|
|
response 18 of 44:
|
Apr 24 23:41 UTC 1997 |
Okay, well let's pretend this item is about something then. Any ideas
about what we should pretend this item is about?
|
valerie
|
|
response 19 of 44:
|
Apr 25 13:40 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 20 of 44:
|
Apr 25 14:07 UTC 1997 |
Only your allergenist knows for sure.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 21 of 44:
|
Apr 26 16:32 UTC 1997 |
I think it has something to do with computers reseting to '84 when their
internal clock goes screwy, lee. md explained it once, but I don't remember
the exact way it works.
|
lee
|
|
response 22 of 44:
|
Apr 26 22:47 UTC 1997 |
Resetting to 1984 seems strange... I could see if something reset
to 1900 or 2000 or even 1950... but 1984 is such a specific year...
UNLESS someone did it on purpose (isn't there a book called 1984?
<lee, who really needs to go read more literature stuffs after
doing too many economics problem sets>
With respect to the allergy, what is it about yellow boums that you
are allergic to... are you allergic to boums of other colours or
the color yellow (as opposed to the color purple) in general?
Disclaimer: I don't know what a boum is.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 23 of 44:
|
Apr 27 02:26 UTC 1997 |
The noise an allergenic flower makes when it explodes.
|
lee
|
|
response 24 of 44:
|
Apr 28 01:13 UTC 1997 |
noises have colours?
|