|
|
| Author |
Message |
cyberpnk
|
|
The Craft...but is it really?
|
Apr 30 16:19 UTC 1996 |
If you haven't heard about it by now, there's a movie about four young
women who become witches called 'The Craft'. Now from what I've seen and
heard about the movie so far (including an interview with one of the actresses
who said that there was a 'real' witch on set) it seems to me that this movie
has a lot of lies, distortions, and half-truths. I urge you to write the head
of Columbia Pictures and Sony Entertainment (the corporate owner) to
protest this Distorted view of Wicca.
<Please note: If I'm wrong, I will of course apologize most profusely.>
|
| 91 responses total. |
robh
|
|
response 1 of 91:
|
Apr 30 16:32 UTC 1996 |
I hate to say it, but there really was a real Witch on the set.
COG had an advisor on the set. The advisor's comment afterr the
film was finished was, "Well, if I hadn't been there, it would
have been worse."
I look forward to two weeks from now, when nobody even remembers
this movie. <fingers crossed>
|
md
|
|
response 2 of 91:
|
Apr 30 16:57 UTC 1996 |
Well, I think the biggest lie in the movie is the idea that
"The Craft" actually enables its practitioners to fly through
the air, perform telekinetic feats, etc. That is, the wiccans
portrayed in this movie are about as realistic as the Jews
portrayed in "The Ten Commandments." "The Witches of Eastwick"
and that awful movie with Bette Midler were the same way. The
trouble is that a movie that accurately portrayed wiccans would
be pretty boring unless you introduced some other plot twists,
just as a realistic portrayal of, say, Lutherans, would be
interesting only to other Lutherans, if that. What makes this
movie different, I think (not having seen it yet), is that
the title appropriates a term which I imagine must be sacred
to wiccans, or next to it.
|
robh
|
|
response 3 of 91:
|
Apr 30 18:29 UTC 1996 |
You've got that on the first try, md. I wouldn't be half as annoyed
with this movie if it were titled "The Witches" or even "The Coven",
but "the Craft" is a term very specific to Wicca, not Satanism.
So the "they're not Wiccans, they're Satanists" explanation isn't
gonna fly. (So to speak.)
Reall, I don't worry about the public reaction to the movie - those
who hate us will continue hating us, those who know us will not
think any differently of us because of a dumb Hollywood movie,
and those who think we're all loonies will continue to do so.
My main concern is that we'll get a huge influx of teens and young
adults who actually think we can do all that crap, and want us
to teach them how. *SIGH*
|
birdlady
|
|
response 4 of 91:
|
Apr 30 19:15 UTC 1996 |
That's already happening <sigh>. :-(
|
brighn
|
|
response 5 of 91:
|
Apr 30 20:14 UTC 1996 |
I'm writing a novel that is about witches...
and I'm making the point several times throughout it that we can't do
any of that crap...
not that I don't wish we could... flying through the air
would be fun! =}
The plot has nothing to do with the supernatural,
but the fact that the main characters are witches is crucial...
it took me a loooooong time to work out a viable pllot that would be
markettable to mundanes and still be an accurate portrayal.
|
robh
|
|
response 6 of 91:
|
Apr 30 20:19 UTC 1996 |
Hey, I know a basic flying spell. The main ingredient is
an airplane ticket. The more advanced flying spell requires
an airplane and a pilot's license. >8)
|
brighn
|
|
response 7 of 91:
|
Apr 30 20:32 UTC 1996 |
i know that spell... i nstead of baby fat, it requires
liquified dinosaur remains...
|
bjorn
|
|
response 8 of 91:
|
Apr 30 21:09 UTC 1996 |
<bjorn runs and hides in the inside of the Mausoleum of Chronepsis>
|
kami
|
|
response 9 of 91:
|
Apr 30 22:11 UTC 1996 |
There was talk all over the net about that movie from its inception; folks
had got hold of the script, or something. Letters of objection, etc. It's
important to let those with money/power know that we exist, are a buying and
voting block and don't want to be misrepresented, but it's also important
not to come off as nuts or go off half-cocked or whatever, which happens
all too often.
As to the sensationalism of psychic abilities, it's less of a problem in
print, I think, since you don't *see* people getting up and flying around
with no strings attached <g>. The thing that's almost impossible to pull
off effectively in video is that flying really does work- on a psychic or
astral or psychological level. None of those "feats" are very impressive
in person, and subtlety doesn't carry well in movies. I wish the industry
were ready to have characters who were interesting in themselves, and also
happened to be Wiccan. Few and far between, same as with gays...Sigh. When
it's done well, we *need* to vote with our dollars, to support good efforts.
"It would have been worse" doesn't cut it for me, and I think that
"consultant" sold out. Just my opinion. Can't have been an easy choice.
And yeah, "the Craft" is a wiccan-specific in-group term, used by some other
wicca-based or related neo-pagans, *not* reconstructionists and generally
not ceremonial magicians, I believe. I don't know that it's a *sacred*
term, although it conveys a significant degree of reverence, but it *is* a
private, in-group term; it assumes you know *which* (er, witch? <g>) "craft"
is meant. Make sense?
|
brighn
|
|
response 10 of 91:
|
Apr 30 22:23 UTC 1996 |
Considering what most Wiccans write when they write, I hardly think
we should blame the industry for "not being ready".
the industry can't be ready to produce materials that aren't available
for production.
If we'd stop it with the Sword and Sorcery crap already (I'm talking
about the shrines that most Pagans I knowhave to DeLint, or
Lackey, or Bradley, or whatever), and produce interesting characters
ourselves, we *would* get published. All the good books with Jewish
protagonists are by Jews (most of them, at least)...
Hollywood proper is out to make money. that didn't stop them from
making The Wedding Banquet, Jeffrey, Threesome, Three of Hearts,
and so on, all of which *promiently* featured gays. What it took was for
those gays who were creative enough and competent enough to get on the stick
and do something to do it...
(and yes, I'm storming at myself here too)
|
kami
|
|
response 11 of 91:
|
May 1 02:49 UTC 1996 |
Brighn, while the preponderance of fantasy based literature is part of the
problem; part of why so many people want to see us walk through wallsor
whatever, it can also be important. Many of us have perceptions and
experiences which are only corroborated in fantasy, and need that room to
expand and stretch into ourselves. Hmmmm, I wonder if the same need couldb
be met by memoirs and such, which are candid about those experiences and
skills? I know I enjoy them, find them useful, but don't get quite as
immersed in them.
Certainly, I agree that we need to do the portraying, if we don't like how
we're portrayed by others. And there are plenty of talented pagan writers.
We can certainly take lessons from the gay community, since we're traveling
a damn similar road, just a half-step behind.
|
brighn
|
|
response 12 of 91:
|
May 1 08:19 UTC 1996 |
I have a review now of the Craft, from Jenna, who saw it on her mother's
press pass tix. It takes Wiccan philosophy (including threefold return
and "perfect love and perfect trust"), combines it with some mythology
about a God named Mana who is the lifeforce (a perversion, I think, of
Magic: The Gathering), and has some pretty nasty bloodbonding. The plot
is basically four teenagers who mess with magic and witchcraft, get
drunk on power, and get screwed by Mana (in a bad way). Unfortunately,
a fairly realistic plot. (In fact, it hit a wee bit too close to home.)
The writing is allegedly abyssmal, and there is plenty of silliness
like levitation and such. Jenna, in brief, panned it. It did, however,
encourage her to talk first with her mother and then with me about
the themes in the film, and it led to some of her own enlightenment,
through her disgust at some of the distortions. It has a happy ending.
There is a positive, older witch role model that is ignored throuhout.
|
brighn
|
|
response 13 of 91:
|
May 1 08:22 UTC 1996 |
And Kami, fantasy is fantasy. If something can only be corroborated
through fantasy, then that's exactly what it is. there is nothing
that has happened to me that, with the right touch and the right
tone, couldn't be depicted in a contemporary life novel without
the mundanes thinking I'm whacked.
If the authors out there writing are too incompetent to manage that,
it's their fault, not the industry's.
|
birdlady
|
|
response 14 of 91:
|
May 1 18:16 UTC 1996 |
(I want to read your book if it gets published, Brighn. It sounds very
interesting).
|
bjorn
|
|
response 15 of 91:
|
May 1 20:10 UTC 1996 |
<Digression> I'd just like to wish eveyone a Happy Beltane!
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 16 of 91:
|
May 2 16:23 UTC 1996 |
LLewellyn oublications puts out some excellent <and accurate> pagan/New Age
fiction.
|
robh
|
|
response 17 of 91:
|
May 2 16:48 UTC 1996 |
Yeah, it's the non-fiction they put out that gives us a bad name. >8)
|
birdlady
|
|
response 18 of 91:
|
May 2 18:45 UTC 1996 |
Yes -- Happy Beltane everyone!!!
(This is seriously belated, but I forgot to post it yesterday...)
<sheepish grin>
|
bjorn
|
|
response 19 of 91:
|
May 2 21:17 UTC 1996 |
<More Digression> My ritual blade arrived today, and I intend to cleanse it
under the Full Moon tomorrow.
|
robh
|
|
response 20 of 91:
|
May 2 21:28 UTC 1996 |
This is a great time to do it being a sabbat and
a full moon both. Have fun doing it!
<robh has a thing about ritual knives>
|
kami
|
|
response 21 of 91:
|
May 2 22:12 UTC 1996 |
Gee, my favorite tool-consecration ritual requires two people...;)
|
bjorn
|
|
response 22 of 91:
|
May 2 23:13 UTC 1996 |
Re#20: will do.
<ahem>
|
robh
|
|
response 23 of 91:
|
May 3 05:41 UTC 1996 |
Re 21 - Never done one of those, kami, being the solitary sort
for the most part. What exactly would that entail? >8)
|
shade
|
|
response 24 of 91:
|
May 3 06:12 UTC 1996 |
(back to the craft) I wouldn't say it had a happy ending. it
had a depressing ending, really. the "good" teenager ws
showing off to the formerly "bad: teenagers that she still
has all her powers,, but dropping a tree almost on them
and terrifying them.
nope. the best character in the movie was the nice witch who ran
the occult shop.
|