You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-37         
 
Author Message
srw
The NCAA Hockey item Mark Unseen   Jan 7 19:08 UTC 1996

This is the item to talk about NCAA Hockey. 

Clearly with all the Michigan and Ohio users here, we will focus on the CCHA,
but ECAC and WCHA comments are certainly welcome.
37 responses total.
srw
response 1 of 37: Mark Unseen   Jan 7 19:15 UTC 1996

I went down to Yost Ice Arena last night to watch the contest between U-M and
Miami. Note that in this sport there is only one Miami, so there is no need
to  qualify it.

I expected that U-M would be able to win. They had beaten Miami earlier, but
it was a tough struggle. I was not fully prepared for the result, though.

Every time any one went in the penalty box, U-M scored. It didn't matter
whether it was a power play or shorthanded. It was amazing. I hadn't been to
a game all season. I usually don't go during football season, and now tickets
are awfully hard to come by. It was great to watch Botterill get a hat trick
in his first game back after playing with the Canadian Junior team.
It was also great to see Morrison, and of course a shutout by Turco, with 
a little help from a walk-on backup goalie at the end.

Final score 13-0. 
bubu
response 2 of 37: Mark Unseen   Jan 11 22:12 UTC 1996

WOW they really pounded them.....I must admit that i do not follow College
hockey very much.  I do however follow the NHL.  Maybe this item will give
me a reason to start following College hockey a little closer...
srw
response 3 of 37: Mark Unseen   Jan 13 06:41 UTC 1996

They beat Chicago Circle tonight, but I don't have the details yet.
hannibal
response 4 of 37: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 18:36 UTC 1996

Yeah, I was at the Miami game too.  It's always fun to watch UM blow out
another team at home though :)  Was that the game in which 2 people won on
the score-o thing?  or was that Ferris State?  hm...I went to both of those
games on that weekend.  UM is always impressive, except this year when they've
been beaten bad by WSU.  I'll be at the OSU game this Friday.  I'll tell
details then.
srw
response 5 of 37: Mark Unseen   Jan 28 08:18 UTC 1996

I heard that they struggled to a tie in the OSU game. Very disappointing.
hannibal
response 6 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 5 02:14 UTC 1996

Yeah...they did...(Sorry about the long delay in the details).  The game was
awesome though.  Lots of big hits.  Askey (OSU Goalie) was awesome, I must
admit.  Everything that went to his glove he stopped.  No one could believe
it.  OSU took the lead 1-0 in the third.  Askey started to skate around with
his arms up in the air...everyone got all over his case because about a minute
or so earlier he tripped a UM player in the goal or something like that and
everyolne was like "WAVE YOUR HANDS NOW ASKEY!" (er..everyone).  Askey ended
up with 50 saves.  About 30 seconds later, UM scored...the crowd was super
hyped up now...I've never heard so much noise in there in my life.  UM went
up 2-1, but then OSU scored and it ende dup a tie 2-2 in OT...(er..up).  It
was a classic though.
hannibal
response 7 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 5 02:17 UTC 1996

Oh..I also went to the UM vs. OSU game the day before that I believe when UM
won 3-0.  Good game...UM doesn't seem to have the same offense as they do
against other teams when they play OSU for some reason though.  I even got
a free, cheap, warm up puck with no UM symbol on the side when it flew up into
the seats next to me at the end of warm ups when no one was there...now it
acts as my coaster for my coke :)
srw
response 8 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 6 06:35 UTC 1996

THat's great, Jason. I'm afraid that if I get a puck it will be at 100 mph.

I've got tickets to the second playoff this weekend (Sat night). 
UM vs I think it's Ferris. At Yost.
hannibal
response 9 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 14:32 UTC 1996

Haha...nope...they played Miami...last home game of the year...kinda
depressing.  I love going to the games!  Well...at least they don't lose too
many of their players, which means they will have another championship team
returning :)
srw
response 10 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 07:41 UTC 1996

You're right. I went, but having earlier been to the 13-0 game, I wasn't
expecting Miami to play nearly as well as they did. They were still no match.

So as we approach the CCHA semifinals, the teams are
LSSU, U-M, MSU, B-G

Michigan will play MSU, I believe (though I've been wrong), and it's fair to
say that MSU has not been playing as well as B-G recently.
hannibal
response 11 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 16 03:05 UTC 1996

Fair?  Heh..right now it's murder!  UM is currently up 5-1 in the second
period...not even mid way through...Turco just made another great save! :)
Looks like it's all UM right now...I don't know who won the LSSU/BG game, but
it looks like whoever it was, they'll be playing UM.  Oh..wait..it's now 5-2
UM.
srw
response 12 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 08:34 UTC 1996

Nevertheless both MSU and BGSU are invited to the NCAA regionals, making
(with U-m, and Lake State) a total of 4 from the CCHA. Very good showing
from the CCHA. 12 teams will play altogether, 6 in the East (at Albany)
and 6 in the west ( at Munn, in E. Lansing). U-M gets a bye on Saturday,
and will play Sunday.

The following week the 4 teams that are left will go to Cincinnati.
hannibal
response 13 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 20 13:39 UTC 1996

Actually...It's UM, MSU, Western Michigan, BGSU, and LSSU...5 teams. Very
impressive indeed.  Of course, I'm pulling for Michigan and hope that they
finally win one of these things and don't lose in triple overtime again like
they did against Maine last year after being up 3-1.  If they make it to the
final four, they'll most likely face Boston U., which would make a pretty good
matchup.  Go Blue!
srw
response 14 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 20 19:13 UTC 1996

That's what happens when I try too this stuff from memory.
You are right that WMU is in the NCAA regional playoffs.
You and I were both wrong about BGSU. They didn't make it.
There are only 4 CCHA teams.

The full schedule can be found on the College Hockey Homepage
http://www.math.umn.edu/~urton/chockey/chockey.html

on the NCAA Tournament page, specifically

You can now view this from Grex via lynx. Membership is no longer required,
but (plug for money) if you really like Grex and are not a member,
consider supporting this system.

Back to hockey. I copied this info from the seedings page

At Albany          At Munn
1E BU              1W Colorado College
2E Vermont         2W Michigan
3E Lake State      3W Minnesota
4E Western Mich    4W Mass Lowell
5E Clarkson        5W Michigan State
6E Cornell         6W Providence


At Albany -- NCAA East Regional
On Friday 03/22/96 
LAKE STATE vs Cornell (5:00 PM EST/TV TBA)
WESTERN MICH vs Clarkson (8:30 PM EST/TV TBA)

On Saturday 03/23/96 
VERMONT vs Lake State/Cornell (5:00 PM EST/TV TBA)
BU vs Western Michigan/Clarkson (8:30 PM EST/TV TBA)

At East Lansing -- NCAA East Regional
On Saturday 03/23/96  
MINNESOTA vs Providence (3:00 PM EST/TV TBA)
MASS LOWELL vs Michigan State (6:30 EST/TV TBA)
 
On Sunday 03/24/96 
MICHIGAN vs Minnesota/Providence (2:00 PM EST/TV TBA)
COLORADO COLLEGE vs Mass Lowell/Michigan State (5:30 EST/TV TBA)

hannibal
response 15 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 21 03:03 UTC 1996

Oh..I'm a little surprised that BGSU didn't make the tournament after the way
they played this year.  I mean, they did have a really good year, then beating
Western Michigan in the playoffs before losing to LSSU.  I never thought that
they'd beat WSU.  I always thought that WSU was underrated this year,
especially after the way they crushed UM twice in a row, like 8-1 and um..I
don't remember the other score.  Oh well...anyways, like I said before, GO
BLUE!
srw
response 16 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 21 05:28 UTC 1996

Exactly Jason. Me too. That's why I put them in the regionals in WMU's place
(erroneously) when I first posted. I remembered incorrectly, but this error
was partly caused by what I expected.
hannibal
response 17 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 02:21 UTC 1996

Well..looks like WMU's history...I don't remember who the other game was
between though.
srw
response 18 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 06:54 UTC 1996

Here's the Eastern Division results. They have finished play in Albany:
LSSU 5, Cornell 4
Clarkson 6, WMU 1
Vermont 2, LSSU 1
BU 3, Clrk 2

And in East Lansing, 

UMN 5, Providence 1
Mass-Lowell 6, MSU 2
UM vs UMN 2PM Sunday
CC vs UML 5:30 PM Sunday

Source: http://www.math.umn.edu/~urton/chockey/chockey.html
srw
response 19 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 19:06 UTC 1996

Yipes.

I just found out that the UM-UMN game will be shown on cable
in AA and Ypsi only. Continental cable has picked up the rights and placed
it on cable 19. I am posting here in the hope that someone who cares will
see it in time to do some good.

Sorry if you are not in the coverage area, AA and Ypsi Cable only.

THANK YOU CONTINENTAL!
srw
response 20 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 21:31 UTC 1996

GREAT GAME!!!!

UM 4-3 winners. No time now to talk about it, maybe later.
srw
response 21 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 22:43 UTC 1996

Well the first period saw UM dominated in most aspects of the game. I think
they got a total of 3 shots, and were very lucky to be down only 2-1.
The second period was much more of a Michigan period. The shots were 
roughly even, but U-M definitely took advantage and tied the game on an
amazing shot that will undoubtedly be the first choice for the news clips on
TV tonight. Mike Legg was left alone behind the Minnesota goal with the puck.
He had no one to pass it to -- everyone was covered. He scooped the puck up
on his stick, and reached around to drop it into the top right corner of the
net, over Goalie DeBus's left shoulder. It wouldn't really be honest to call
it a shot. It was the rough equivalent of a slam-dunk in Basketball.

I have seen players do this before in practice -- never in a game. It is not
an easy skill to be able to hold a puck in the air on the blade of your stick.
If any of the gophers had expected it, it would have been easy to defense --
it would have fallen off of his stick if anyone had even breathed on it.

Then in the third period they scored a great goal to go ahead 3-2, but got
defensive too early, and gave up the tie with something around 5 minutes left
in the game. Everybody started thinking it would go into overtime, as the game
had been a defensive struggle so far, with lots of great checking.

But no, Bill Muckalt scored the game winner for Michigan with 2 minutes left,
off a great pass-out from the boards by Brendan Morisson.

--

I am not sure of the matchups for next week, but I believe that of CC beats
UML in the second game, Michigan will play Vermont, but if UML upsets CC then
Michigan will get Clarkson instead. Those games will be in Cincinnati.

The college hockey homepage will have these details after the CC-UML game.
hannibal
response 22 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 26 23:34 UTC 1996

I thought that it was now UM vs. Boston U. in the final four and CC vs.
Vermont or someone like that?
hannibal
response 23 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 27 23:49 UTC 1996

Oops..and CC vs. Vermont or someone like that?
srw
response 24 of 37: Mark Unseen   Mar 28 07:55 UTC 1996

Yup I goofed. Clarkson was eliminated. It's BU. 

CC-Vermont is on ESPN2 at 2 PM tomorrow.

UM-BU is on ESPN2 at 8PM 

all times EST

Michigan could have a tiger by the tail in BU. I hope they're ready.
If they're ready, they should be able to beat them.
 0-24   25-37         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss