|
|
| Author |
Message |
carson
|
|
The menage a trois
| 
Jun 29 06:37 UTC 1994 |
(You've been in a romantic relationship for almost a month now. One day,
your significant other says that s/he has also been seeing another person,
and s/he can't decide between the two of you, so s/he would like to have
both! She suggests that the two of you meet at his/her place for
dinner.... and a little something else, "just to see if it would work out.")
(do you accept?)
|
| 37 responses total. |
scg
|
|
response 1 of 37:
|
Jun 29 06:41 UTC 1994 |
I find it very hard to imagine that I would, but it would probably depend
somewhat on the relationship.
|
canis
|
|
response 2 of 37:
|
Jun 29 17:18 UTC 1994 |
it would depend on the realtionship. I would probably be mad at her for a
while, but if I really cared for her, I might accept it.
|
omni
|
|
response 3 of 37:
|
Jun 29 19:36 UTC 1994 |
I would dump them like a hot potato right then and there. If my love is
not special enough for a person to accept, or that they feel they need me
to fill out a need, then they don't really need me.
I expect that when dating, it should be mutually exclusive; If that's too
much to expect from someone, then they obviously have much to learn about
life.
|
dang
|
|
response 4 of 37:
|
Jun 29 21:30 UTC 1994 |
no, i wouldn't. like omni, i believe that love should be between two
people. i would regretfully decline, and end the relationship.
|
kimba
|
|
response 5 of 37:
|
Jul 1 17:46 UTC 1994 |
I've had this happen, and needless to say, the guy and the other person, who
was a friend, both got dumped pronto!
|
swa
|
|
response 6 of 37:
|
Jul 2 19:44 UTC 1994 |
I'd definitely say no, and break up with them. The only thing that would
|
popcorn
|
|
response 7 of 37:
|
Jul 2 23:14 UTC 1994 |
This response has been erased.
|
cicero
|
|
response 8 of 37:
|
Jul 3 15:03 UTC 1994 |
I would at least meet the person, what the heck? At that point things
have nowhere to go but up. Besides it is not my place to tell another
person what relationships he or she can have. Am I going to stop
liking this person just because he/she (being very politically correct
here) has an interest in someone else? No way. I Might end the romantic
relationsip, but I wouldn't want to lose a friend.
|
swa
|
|
response 9 of 37:
|
Jul 6 06:26 UTC 1994 |
(Why do I keep getting my responses cut off like that? I've had it happen a
couple of times, in a couple of different conferences, lately. *Very*
frustrating.) In any case, the only thing that would depend on the
relationship would be *how* I broke up with them, exactly what I told them.
It might be kind of painful, but I don't think I could deal with continuing
a relationship with them while they were seeing someone else, let alone the
fact that I would consider it very dishonest of them to have been seeing the
other person beforehand behind my back.
|
gmd131
|
|
response 10 of 37:
|
Jul 8 03:17 UTC 1994 |
I would definitely go and then point out that there is no question who
is the best.....me you stupid idiot!
|
vishnu
|
|
response 11 of 37:
|
Jul 12 08:31 UTC 1994 |
It really depends on what kind of relationship this is... i mean,
if its a big physical pleasures type of relationship with lots of
kinky things and not much commitment, then, sure, why not? If it
was more of a meaningful relationship, I'd meet them just to see
what they were like, and then decide from there.
|
turtle
|
|
response 12 of 37:
|
Jul 13 17:43 UTC 1994 |
I aggree with vishnu. If the relationship had started as a threesome, fine,
but having your partner sneaking around behind your back and then expecting
you to just accept it is just not cool.
|
y
|
|
response 13 of 37:
|
Aug 5 06:10 UTC 1994 |
Carson did you take this right from my life ;)
and if you all are woundering i axed her the minute i found out.
1 I dont share
and 2 I dont compete after a sertian point
|
mdj
|
|
response 14 of 37:
|
Aug 29 02:16 UTC 1994 |
Well, i know i'm going to get flack on this but, i would do it (providing the
other person was a woman) for few times to get my jollies then smack her and
tell her she's sick and that i hope she's happy. If it were another man i'd
say sure bring him over and compare us in bed but, it would'nt get that far
cause i'd kick the life outta him and smack her.
|
popcorn
|
|
response 15 of 37:
|
Aug 30 03:22 UTC 1994 |
This response has been erased.
|
dang
|
|
response 16 of 37:
|
Sep 14 16:13 UTC 1994 |
#insert <standard.points.honesty> here
|
luci
|
|
response 17 of 37:
|
Oct 29 03:35 UTC 1994 |
There are times and places for everything. Don't knock it till you've tried
it. A phallic in one's hand is definitely worth two in the bush.
|
brighn
|
|
response 18 of 37:
|
Oct 29 04:34 UTC 1994 |
Two in the bush? Ain't that a bit tight?
Seriously, I missed this item the first time round, and I'm frankly glad.
Despite the deception part (by the way, honey, I've been sleeping with Ted for
three months now: how about a threesome?), I don't have a problem with it. If
I weren't attracted to the other party myself, I'd probably decline, but if I
were attracted, why not?
Omni mentions that if his love isn't good enough, he doesn't want to share it.
I have one good friend. Guess I don't need any others; wouldn't want to hurt
my one friend's feelings.
It's a good thing I hate my little brother, too, because I only have enough
brotherly love for my older brother.
Love is in such limited supply these days.
|
ssardion
|
|
response 19 of 37:
|
Nov 11 23:16 UTC 1994 |
Definitely, definitely, definitely
|
popcorn
|
|
response 20 of 37:
|
Nov 13 09:40 UTC 1994 |
This response has been erased.
|
bonita
|
|
response 21 of 37:
|
Nov 15 02:46 UTC 1994 |
Well, #17, that's interesting to know...remember me? Your girlfriend of
over a year and half now, the one who thinks that one on one is the only way
to go?
|
brighn
|
|
response 22 of 37:
|
Nov 15 03:01 UTC 1994 |
(Thanks, popcorn -- I meant, though, that I missed the discussion in
real time. As soon as 17 responded, I got the other messages.)
(brighn knows popcorn is being her ever helpful self)
|
popcorn
|
|
response 23 of 37:
|
Nov 15 16:16 UTC 1994 |
This response has been erased.
|
luci
|
|
response 24 of 37:
|
Nov 16 20:40 UTC 1994 |
oops! Sorry Melanie. My sentiment was that if all parties agree then who
is to say that it's all bad. Course, if you feel love for someone then
monogamy is best. Menage a trois is for the adventurous and single or at
least mutually accepting couples...how's that?
|