|
|
| Author |
Message |
diznave
|
|
Laplace Transforms
| 
Nov 8 08:11 UTC 1996 |
Is it possible to get the LaPlace transfer of a constant?....just
wondering...thanks.
Is it possible to get the Laplace transform of a constant?...Just
wondering...Thanks.
|
| 5 responses total. |
orinoco
|
|
response 1 of 5:
|
Nov 26 00:49 UTC 1996 |
Is it just me, or are these few the first time math has gotten into the
picture here?
|
eskarina
|
|
response 2 of 5:
|
Dec 1 01:24 UTC 1996 |
tis tis, and I only wish I knew what a Laplace Transform was.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 3 of 5:
|
Dec 2 22:52 UTC 1996 |
ditto...hate to see a "first" like this die on us
|
hokshila
|
|
response 4 of 5:
|
Dec 6 00:04 UTC 1996 |
No it is not.
No it is not.
What is the LaPlace transfer of a constant?
What is the LaPlace transfer of a constant?
Not enough data to answer the query....
|
rkk
|
|
response 5 of 5:
|
Nov 9 08:22 UTC 1998 |
Guess u would have found the answer by now.Anyway...
The laplace transform of a constant is just too easy. You might be
asking for the inverse Laplace of a constant.
For the guys who don`t know what a Laplace transform is,
L[f(t)] = Laplace transform of the function f(t)
= integral( e^(-s*t) * f(t) ) with limits from 0 to s.
So, the Laplace transform of a constant is just c/s. You can easily
integrate and find it out yourself.
The Laplace inverse of a constant is the the constant multiplied by
the dirac delta function.
|