|
|
| Author |
Message |
tocohl
|
|
Is pseudo a dirty word?
| 
Dec 6 19:13 UTC 1991 |
Is being considered a pseudo an insult? If someone thought you were a
pseudo, would you be insulted, amused, or apathetic? How about if you
*are* a pseudo and someone thinks you are real?
|
| 29 responses total. |
griz
|
|
response 1 of 29:
|
Dec 6 21:54 UTC 1991 |
When I first logged on, someone accused me of being a pseudo. I was
amused, and not insulted.
|
bad
|
|
response 2 of 29:
|
Dec 7 04:15 UTC 1991 |
No, I took care of the insulting later :)
|
reach
|
|
response 3 of 29:
|
Dec 7 06:17 UTC 1991 |
If pseudo is indeed a dirty word, what should one wash one's mouth out
with?
|
jenny
|
|
response 4 of 29:
|
Dec 9 05:14 UTC 1991 |
Imaginary soap, of course.
|
reach
|
|
response 5 of 29:
|
Dec 13 07:00 UTC 1991 |
I wash and wash with imaginary soap, but I still feel dirty.
Imaginary soap promotes compulsiveness.
The only thing that can be said for it is that it does not dry out my skin.
|
bad
|
|
response 6 of 29:
|
Dec 13 22:05 UTC 1991 |
Well, that's something, anyway.
|
mythago
|
|
response 7 of 29:
|
Dec 17 18:50 UTC 1991 |
Bryan Case used to drive people nuts on ub/um by making up pseudos
(named after extremely obscure literary characters) and having them
argue with each other from totally different points of view. We had
a few people convinced for a +very+ long time that "Laurel Goulding"
was really just a pseudo...then some idiot spilled the beans.
|
craig
|
|
response 8 of 29:
|
Dec 19 00:10 UTC 1991 |
I have 2 popular pseudonyms on Grex & Arbornet, and find the diversion
to be good fun.
|
reach
|
|
response 9 of 29:
|
Dec 23 05:32 UTC 1991 |
The other, we presume, being "Pluto".
|
popcorn
|
|
response 10 of 29:
|
Mar 30 03:54 UTC 1992 |
This response has been erased.
|
keats
|
|
response 11 of 29:
|
Mar 30 12:52 UTC 1992 |
ew. stop that.
|
mythago
|
|
response 12 of 29:
|
May 4 03:17 UTC 1992 |
Some people think so, popcorn.
|
keats
|
|
response 13 of 29:
|
May 4 03:27 UTC 1992 |
yes, "people" is a good word to use.
|
popcorn
|
|
response 14 of 29:
|
May 4 03:58 UTC 1992 |
This response has been erased.
|
keats
|
|
response 15 of 29:
|
May 5 01:08 UTC 1992 |
i'll have to check with my lawyer before ansering that question, val.
|
aaron
|
|
response 16 of 29:
|
May 5 01:17 UTC 1992 |
No 5th Amendment protection, there...
|
spite
|
|
response 17 of 29:
|
May 11 00:18 UTC 1992 |
I don't have anything against this Case fellow, but I wish that I did, and
it was a wrecking ball.
|
vidar
|
|
response 18 of 29:
|
Jul 4 22:24 UTC 1993 |
WE are not ammused.
|
vidar
|
|
response 19 of 29:
|
Jul 28 14:33 UTC 1993 |
!@^^& @# **@&#&$(@$__@#$&**@#^!!
|
jasmine
|
|
response 20 of 29:
|
Jul 29 16:46 UTC 1993 |
Problem???
|
skeez
|
|
response 21 of 29:
|
Aug 7 23:08 UTC 1993 |
He missed his nap. And his pills. He gets kinda mad when un-sedated.
|
jasmine
|
|
response 22 of 29:
|
Aug 9 02:47 UTC 1993 |
Mommy... I need my medication..!
|
tired
|
|
response 23 of 29:
|
Aug 9 06:04 UTC 1993 |
Aren't you all bored with this (very nearly interesting) conversation yet?
It's been going on so long!
|
skeez
|
|
response 24 of 29:
|
Aug 10 02:01 UTC 1993 |
I think someone's getting a bit cranky.
|