|
|
| Author |
Message |
olddraco
|
|
Digital Camera
|
Jun 19 21:06 UTC 1998 |
I recently bought a Sony Mavica MVC-FD7. For the un-initiated that
is a 640 x 480 color digital camera that records directly to
IBM format 3.5 floppies. The camera is literally amazing.
Anyone else out there have a digital camera?
|
| 38 responses total. |
happyboy
|
|
response 1 of 38:
|
Jul 17 03:28 UTC 1998 |
no...but i'm gonna.
|
vrondi
|
|
response 2 of 38:
|
Jan 2 01:57 UTC 1999 |
I have a B+W Quickcam. It does a better job than one would think. But It
is meant mostly for low-stress video conferencing. I've done some interesting
collages of friends with this.
I've ordered a new colour digital camera , but it's not here yet.
IT's a Mustek camera with a max resolution of 640x490, and a builtin flash.
This one uses the little memory cards though, not floppies. No way coul I
afford a Mavica, no matter how much they may make me drool. The Mustek has
a 1.8 inch colour back-lit LCD screen on the back so you can preview your
shots and delete them right after you take them. There's also a serial cable
provided so you can send the photos to a computer without any special
adapters. This camera is also TWAIN compliant.
Today being new years, and a Friday however, IT'll be the end of next
week at least before I get my hands on this neat gadget.
IT costs $180-$190.
When it arrives, I'll post some shots on my web site for comparison.
PErhaps any other GREXers with digital cameras could sen along some shots,
and I could put up a comparison of shots from different cameras? IF anyone
is interested in doing this, e-mail me at vrondi@cyberspace.org
|
vrondi
|
|
response 3 of 38:
|
Jun 28 00:23 UTC 1999 |
The digital camera was, alas, out of stock...
|
rcurl
|
|
response 4 of 38:
|
Jun 29 15:08 UTC 1999 |
There is an alternative. I recently sent a role of film to Seattle Film
Works for processing. I haven't gotten back the slides and prints yet,
but I got an e-mail telling me they were coming - and a URL where I
can see and download all of my pictures right away - and, as far as I
could tell from the message, for free. I haven't looked yet, but this
could be a great way to get processionally scanned photos as well as
regular slides and prints. What can a digital camera do that this would
not accomplish?
|
omni
|
|
response 5 of 38:
|
Jun 29 18:10 UTC 1999 |
cut out the processor.
|
scott
|
|
response 6 of 38:
|
Jun 29 20:11 UTC 1999 |
Allow you to immediately delete bad shots, rather than have them processed.
Great if the lighting is iffy.
You can also do a very quick one or two shots, then put them online instead
of having to use up (or waste) a roll of film.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 7 of 38:
|
Jun 30 05:15 UTC 1999 |
All good points....though dependent on how you want to use photography.
I only take good shots and am never in a hurry... 8^}
|
omni
|
|
response 8 of 38:
|
Jun 30 06:25 UTC 1999 |
Of course. I forgot that your real name was Ansel Adams Curl. ;)
|
rcurl
|
|
response 9 of 38:
|
Jun 30 15:01 UTC 1999 |
He did a lot of dodging to fix his mistakes (well, actually for artistic
effect, but he should have taken the picture right the first time....).
|
rcurl
|
|
response 10 of 38:
|
Jul 1 16:12 UTC 2000 |
Not yet having a photo-quality printer, where can I get digital
photographs on a floppy disk printed? (I have a vague memory of hearing
there are do-it-yourself places.) Also, is there a required format for the
image, or a required disk format (Mac, PC or both)?
|
happyboy
|
|
response 11 of 38:
|
Jul 1 16:19 UTC 2000 |
meijers?
|
scott
|
|
response 12 of 38:
|
Jul 1 20:41 UTC 2000 |
Probably Kinko's does it.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 13 of 38:
|
Jul 1 20:45 UTC 2000 |
stay away from p. photo and studio center unless you
want archival prints. big bucks.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 14 of 38:
|
Jul 3 17:19 UTC 2000 |
Not meijer - they only have a film scanner to print 8x11 at $7 a pop.
At that rate it is worth buying a photoquality printer!
|
happyboy
|
|
response 15 of 38:
|
Jul 3 19:14 UTC 2000 |
yikes! no kiddin.
|
keesan
|
|
response 16 of 38:
|
Jul 6 22:53 UTC 2001 |
Does anyone own a SAMPO digital camera? The DCE-211 is said to have manual
focus, to 6", and use serial cable and produce 640 res, which is what we are
after for use with a DOS computer. Anyone own an Epson PhotoPC? The latter
will work with DOS-based download software (64K exe file) and I am curious
if the SAMPO will use the same software (also used by Olympus, Polaroid,
Nikon, Agfa, Sanyo).
|
keesan
|
|
response 17 of 38:
|
Jul 9 18:34 UTC 2001 |
I found a used Epson PhotoPC (the original) on eBay for $50. It has 1M
internal memory, no LCD monitor, but it does autofocus (which two later and
more expensive models 500 and 550 do not). Has flash (550 does not). Takes
plain AA batteries, serial cable, and uses DOS-based software for download.
640 res - all our laptop can show anyway (and only in mono VGA). Can use it
with an AC adaptor to take pictures of Jim's progress (if any) building our
house. If anyone is still reading this item, can you explain how to use
autofocus with an add-on closeup lens (available for $12)? Can you see what
you are about to photograph? Optical viewfinder. The primary lens is 43mm
and goes 2' to infinity, not ideal for photographing old slides.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 18 of 38:
|
Jul 9 19:51 UTC 2001 |
The autofocus on a digital camera works by refocusing until the
image on the CCD is *sharp*. It knows this because of contrasts between
adjacent elements. Therefore a close-up lens just allows you to get
closer and still have the camera do its focus thing. Usually you cannot
frame in a viewfinder a close-up image, but you can, of course, frame
it in a LCD monitor.
|
gull
|
|
response 19 of 38:
|
Jul 9 20:14 UTC 2001 |
Some of the digital cameras allow you to view a live picture on the
computer, even if the camera lacks an LCD. You could always frame
things up that way.
|
gull
|
|
response 20 of 38:
|
Apr 2 16:15 UTC 2004 |
Tip: Those peel-and-stick screen protectors CompUSA sells for PDAs work
well to protect digital camera LCDs from scratches. Just cut them down
to the size of your LCD screen and apply the same way you would to a
PDA. It takes a little practice to get them on without annoying air
bubbles, but after wasting two or three I had the technique down. They
last a surprisngly long time. The camera at work has one I applied a
year ago that's just getting to the point where I'm thinking about
replacing it, and that camera is heavily (and carelessly) used.
|
eprom
|
|
response 21 of 38:
|
Apr 27 04:32 UTC 2004 |
Konica-Minolta is coming out with a digital SLR. The cool thing about this
is that it will have anti-shake technology built into the body instead of the
lenses. It should be due out in the fall of 2004. Personally I think the body
looks better than the digital Rebel or Nikon D70.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0402/04021220maxxum7digital.asp
|
gull
|
|
response 22 of 38:
|
Apr 27 14:45 UTC 2004 |
Pretty sharp looking, yes. It's interesting how control layouts on
digital cameras seem to be converging. The back panel layout is pretty
similar to my Digital Rebel.
|
eprom
|
|
response 23 of 38:
|
Jul 26 21:52 UTC 2006 |
I'm really eyeballing the Sony A-(alpha)100. It will be Sonys entry into the
Digital SLR market. They used Konica-Minoltas DSLR as a starting point and
improved it from there.
What really suprised me was how commited Sony seems to be in getting a share
of the professional market by announcing they will be working with Carl Ziess
to have three pro-grade lense fit their DSLR.
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/sonydslra100/page3.asp
I think the CZ 16-80mm F3.5-4.5 would be the perfect everyday lense.
|
ball
|
|
response 24 of 38:
|
Oct 14 05:01 UTC 2006 |
I caught my wife grepping eBay for a Nikon D50, which I
understand to be an entry-level digital SLR. How bad are
these? What would you recommend instead?
|