stacie
|
|
Fathering
|
Jun 19 16:31 UTC 2000 |
There is a good article about some new findings in regards to fathering
on CNN today. I have also included a link to the actual study. :)
Article: http://www.apa.org/journals/fam/fam142200.html
---
Children benefit from fathers' involvement
New studies examine men's role in the family
June 16, 2000
Web posted at: 4:05 p.m. EDT (2005 GMT)
ATLANTA (CNN) -- Just in time for Father's Day, new research shows that
dads do make a difference in the lives of their children, and examines
what factors influence men's involvement with their kids.
Researchers at the University of Maryland determined that children who
have fathers in their lives learn better, have higher self-esteem and
show fewer signs of depression than children without fathers.
The results shouldn't be surprising, according to one expert.
"All you have to do is ask any child, frankly," said James Levine of the
Families and Work Institute. "You don't have to ask a child development
researcher if fathers make a difference. All kids will tell you that the
presence of a father makes a big difference."
Emotional connection key
The researchers interviewed 855 children in five states. All had been
deemed high risk. Those with fathers in their lives scored higher on
basic learning skills tests. The findings applied equally to white and
minority children.
The study did not address whether a bad father is better than no father
at all. And the findings don't necessarily mean that children who grow
up in single-parent homes can't be successful.
"A lot of times these children are getting more attention than they
would in a two-parent home because the single parent is very conscious
of the fact that it's one person doing the entire job, so they rely on
teamwork, cooperation," said Brook Noel of Single Parents magazine.
Whatever the family situation, experts stress that a father or father
figure should stay emotionally connected with his kids.
"A little is better than nothing," said psychologist Penelope Leach,
"and you can be really involved with a child on the basis of the talking
and playing and being there emotionally, even if you can't be there
physically all the time."
Fathers taking on greater role
What makes a dad get involved with his child? A separate study conducted
by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development focused
on that question. The study was published in the June issue of the
Journal of Family Psychology, a journal of the American Psychological
Association.
Researchers found that how much both parents work plays a role in a
father's caregiving activities, as does the man's self-esteem. Fathers
also tend to be more involved with sons than daughters, according to the
study.
The researchers followed hundreds of families from 10 cities across the
United States. The fathers were interviewed about their caregiving
activities like feeding, bathing and changing diapers when their
children were between six months old and 3 years old. Some of the
fathers were also videotaped playing with their children at age six
months and 3 years, to determine their level of sensitivity toward the
child.
The study found that fathers were more involved in caregiving when they
worked fewer hours than other fathers, and when the mothers worked more
hours outside the home. The finding "suggests that mothers' full-time
employment creates demands on family life" that require the father to
take on more responsibility regardless of his attitudes toward child
rearing.
More involved fathers were also younger and had higher self-esteem and
lower levels of depression and hostility. However, the researchers found
that older fathers were more sensitive toward their children.
The researchers concluded that workplace policies that allow fathers
more flexibility would increase their level of involvement with their
children. The authors also suggested developing programs to teach men
about their children's needs as a way of increasing their sensitivity.
CNN Parenting Correspondent Pat Etheridge contributed to this report
|
kami
|
|
response 1 of 2:
|
Jun 24 02:26 UTC 2000 |
Seems pretty obvious to me...
Well, without being glib, there are really two different issues; one is about
male role models in the lives of both sons and daughters, and the other is
about how many primary adults a kid needs. My sense, regarding the latter,
is that two is a *minimum*... As the the former- while kids do grow up fine
in households with one parent or two parents of the same sex, I think the most
hope for progress toward an equal society in which everyone has equal choice
about how they make their lives and livings, comes from kids getting to
experience both male and female rolemodels as multi-dimensional beings, as
a "what" (job title or volunteer position) and a "who" (personal
characteristic and participation in a family group).
|